Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

The Theoretical Understanding of Civil Process, Participants and Judicial Jurisdiction in the U.S. and in Russia

G.O. Abolonin,
Candidate of Legal Scienes, Consultant on the Legal Support over Investments 
and Court Protection of Rights and Legal Interests of Foreing Investors


The article is devoted to the comparative analysis of theoretical views on civil litigation in the United States and Russia. Civil process is understood here as a set of general principles of dealing with civil disputes in courts and various procedural means used by lawyers in order to file a suit or, respectively, protect from brought civil suit. «Proceeding» means in legal theory of the United States a formalized contest of parties undertaking to the competent authority of the jurisdiction, in most cases to the court, in order to ensure the implementation of the rights provided by law. The core of the subject of civil procedural law that distinguishes it from the branches of the material law is the fact that the procedural law is looking for the best options for representation by lawyers in civil cases to protect the interests of their clients in the courts of various instances. In Russia the civil procedural law plays the role of branch of science. Civil process is universal compulsory form of protection of subjective rights arising not only and not so much from civil relationships, but much more of family, labor, social, housing, land, environmental and even public relationships. 

Keywords: civil procedure; a branch of science; comparative law.


References

  Friedenthal J., Kane M.K., Miller A. Civil Procedure. West Publishing Co., 1985. P. 1. 
  Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik. Glava I [Civil Process: Textbook. Ch. I] (in Russian) / Ed. by I.V. Reshetnikova. M., 2004.       Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Process: Textbook. Ch. I] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. M., 2007.                   Yudel’son K.S. Voprosy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessa voennogo vremeni [Questions of Soviet Civil Process Wartime] (in Russian). Sverdlovsk, 1943. P. 3. 
  Sovetsky grazhdansky protsess [Soviet Civil Process] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.S. Shakaryan. M., 1985. P. 7. 
  Mozolin V.P. O grazhdansko-protsessual’nom pravootnoshenii [About Civil Procedural Legal Relationship] (in Russian) // Soviet State and Law. 1955. No. 6. P. 56. 
  Sovetsky grazhdansky protsess [Soviet Civil Process] (in Russian) / Ed. by K.I. Komissarov, V.M. Semenov. M., 1988. P. 11–12. 
  Gagarinov A.V. Ponyatie grazhdanskogo protsessa [The Notion of Civil Procedure] (in Russian) // Jurisprudence. 1988. No. 4. P. 96–99. 
  Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo. Glava 4 [Soviet Civil Procedural Law. Ch. 4] (in Russian) / Ed. by P.P. Gureev. M., 1981. P. 43. 
  Gambarov Yu.S. Grazhdansky protsess. Kurs lektsy [Civil Procedure: Course of Lectures] (in Russian) (1894–1895). Istoriya gosudarstva i prava zarubezhnykh stran. Glava VIII [History of State and Law of Foreign Countries. Ch. VIII] (in Russian) / Ed. by B.S. Gromakov. M., 1980. P. 303–305. 
  Saushkin S.A. Istoricheskie i pravovye osnovy formirovaniya ekspertizy v tamozhennom dele rossiyskogo gosudarstva (XI–XIX vv.) [Historical and Legal Basis for the Formation of Expertise in the Customs of the Russian State (XI–XIX centuries)] (in Russian) // Customs Business. 2007. No. 2. 
  Frank J. Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. Princeton University Press, 1949. 
  Lenin V.I. Poln sobr. soch. [Complete Works] (in Russian). Vol. 18. P. 137. 
  Hazard J.C., Jr., Taruffo M. American Civil Procedure: An Introduction. Yale University Press, 1995. P. 75. 
  Zander M.A. A Matter of Justice: The Legal System in Ferment. I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd., 1989. P. 140. 
  Puchinsky V.K. Grazhdansky protsess SShA [Civil Procedure of United States] (in Russian). M., 1985. P. 10. 
  Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. 5th ed. M., 2004. P. 598.           Voronov A.F. Grazhdansky protsess: evolyutsiya dispozitivnosti [Civil Procedure: Evolution of Discretionary] (in Russian). M., 2007. Friedenthal J., Kane M.K., Miller A. Civil Procedure. West Publishing Co., 1985. P. 313. 
  Osipov Yu.K. Podvedomstvennost’ yuridicheskikh del [Jurisdiction Legal Cases] (in Russian). Sverdlovsk, 1973. P. 83. 
  Rieder Chr.M. U. S. Subject Matter Jurisdiction for Copyright Infringements on the Internet // Computer Law Review and Technology Journal. 1998. 
  Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. 4th ed. M., 2001. P. 139–140.   Fortune H. Pendent Jurisdiction – The Problem of «Pending Parties» // University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 1972. Vol. 34.       Zhuykov V.M. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiyu [Judicial Reform: The Problem of Access to Justice] (in Russian). M., 2006. 
  Eliseev N.G. Razreshenie kollizy podvedomstvennosti [Resolution of Conflicts of Jurisdiction] (in Russian) // Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, and Practice. 2007. No. 8. 

Information about the author 

  Abolonin G.O. (Moscow) – Candidate of Legal Scienes, Consultant on the Legal Support over Investments and Court Protection of Rights and Legal Interests of Foreing Investors (e-mail: [email protected]).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

G.O. Abolonin