We in a citing index:
Procedural Guarantees of Realization and Protection of Rights of Participants of Commercial («Arbitrazh») Process in Judicial Proceedings
I.A. Khasanshin,
Judge of the Commercial («Arbitrazh»)
Court of the Republic of Tatarstan
Trial stage is the central stage of the commercial («arbitrazh») proceeding in the proceedings at first instance. At this stage the court considers the merits, examines the evidence directly, comprehensively and fully sets out the circumstances of the case, makes a legitimate and informed decision. Anyway, all the other stages of the commercial («arbitrazh») proceeding «work» on the trial stage: at the moment of the adoption of the statement of claim the issue of the possibility to proceed to litigation is considered, the next step is determining the readiness of the case to be quickly and properly deal with the substance during the first court hearing. Preparatory part of the trial, as its name implies, is designed to ensure the resolution of all procedural issues not directly related to the resolution of the question of the substantive rights and obligations of persons involved in the case. In this respect, the preparatory part of the trial pursues the same objectives as the case preparation stage in the proceedings. Consideration of the merits of the trial as a stage in the commercial («arbitrazh») proceeding is reduced to the explanations of the persons participating in the case, as well as the study of evidences. Summarizing the court hearing, the person involved in the case must determine what the circumstances are installed, what are not installed; what is their legal qualification and how should the case be adjudged.
Keywords: commercial («arbitrazh») proceeding; guarantees.
References
Tikhonova E.V. Arbitrazhny protsess i treteyskoe razbiratel’stvo [Arbitration Proceedings and Arbitration] (in Russian). Tambov, 2011.
Efimova V.V. Arbitrazhnoe protsessual’noe pravo [Arbitration Proceedings Law] (in Russian). M., 2008. P. 80. Arbitrazhny protsess: Uchebnik [Arbitration Proceedings: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. M., 2007. P. 182.
Tolpygina T. Arbitrazhny protsess: aktual’nye voprosy [Arbitration Process: Current Issues] (in Russian) // Financial Newspaper. 2012. Jan. No. 3.
Sherstyuk V.M. Realizatsiya printsipov arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva v zakonakh, prinyatykh posle vstupleniya v silu APK RF [Implementation of the Principles of the Arbitration Proceedings in the Laws Adopted after the Entry into Force of the Arbitration Procedure Code] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2011. March. No.3.
Yudin A. Otvetstvennost’ za neuvazhenie k sudu [Responsibility for Contempt of Court] (in Russian) // ej-Lawyer. 2006. May. No. 20.
Bonner A.T. Audiozapis’ khoda sudebnogo razbiratel’stva [Audiotape Course of the Trial] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2007. No. 6.
Gerasimova Yu.A. Tekhnicheskie novinki arbitrazhnogo protsessa. Iskovoe zayavlenie cherez Internet, audiozapis’ kak protokol sudebnogo zasedaniya, videokonferentssvyaz’ v sude [Technical Highlights of the Arbitration Process. The Statement of Claim through the Internet, Audiotape as Court Record, Video Conferencing in Court] (in Russian) // Administrative Law. 2011. No. 2.
Praktika primeneniya Arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Practical Application of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) / Ed. by I.V. Reshetnikova. M., 2012.
Chaplinsky A.V. Dostup publiki v zaly sudebnykh zasedaniy [Public Access to Courtrooms] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2011. Oct. No. 10.
Shelenkova E. Pereryv v sudebnom zasedanii [Break in the Court Session] (in Russian) // ej-Lawyer. 2005. No. 14.
Sherstyuk V.M. APK RF: Kommentary k glave 19 «Sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo» [Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation: Commentary to the Chapter 19 «Trial»] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2003. March. No. 3; Apr. No. 4.
Voronov A.F. Evolyutsiya printsipa nepreryvnosti sudebnogo razbiratel’stva v grazhdanskom protsesse [The Evolution of the Principle of Continuity of the Trial in Civil Proceedings] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2006. May. No. 5.
Ul’yanova M.Yu. Osobennosti otlozheniya sudebnogo razbiratel’stva v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Deposition’s Features of the Trial in the Arbitration Process] (in Russian) // Economic Justice in the Far East Russia. 2008. No. 2.
Lazareva O.V., Tikhonova E.V., Starostin M.E. Kommentary k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 27.07.2010 No. 193-FZ «Ob al’ternativnoy protsedure uregulirovaniya sporov s uchastiem posrednika (protsedure mediatsii)» [Commentary to the Federal Law of July 27, 2010 No. 193-FZ «On Alternative Dispute Resolution Involving Mediation (Mediation Procedure)] (in Russian) (System «Garant»). Bonner A.T. Audio- i videozapisi kak dokazatel’stvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Audio- and Videotapes as Evidence in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2008. March. No. 3.
Lermontov Yu. Postanovlenie Plenuma VAS No. 53 [Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court No. 53] (in Russian) // Audit and Taxation. 2007. No. 3; Apr. No. 4.
Sherstyuk V.M. Razvitie printsipa neposredstvennosti v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Development of the Principle of Immediacy in the Arbitration Process] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2004. Jan. No. 1.
Kuznetsov A.B. «Vnutrennee ubezhdenie» sud’i – ne beskontrol’naya ubezhdennost’ [«Inner Conviction» of Judge – No Uncontrolled Conviction] (in Russian) (System «Garant»). Ryzhakov A.P. Postateyny kommentary k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu RF [Commentaries to the Code of Arbitration Procedure] (in Russian). 3rd ed. (System «Garant»). Batyaev A.A., Terekhova Yu.K. Kommentary k Zakonu RF ot 7 iyulya 1993 g. No. 5338-I «O mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe» [Commentary to the Law of the Russian Federation of July 7, 1993 No. 5338-I «On International Commercial Arbitration»](in Russian) (System «Garant»).
Arestova O.N., Kovaleva N.N. Kommentary k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 22 dekabrya 2008 g. No. 262-FZ «Ob obespechenii dostupa k informatsii o deyatel’nosti sudov v Rossiyskoy Federatsii» [Commentary to the Federal Law of December 22, 2008 No. 262-FZ «On Access to Information about the Courts of the Russian Federation»] (in Russian) (System «Garant»). Ivanov A.A. O putyakh povysheniya effektivnosti pravosudiya [Ways to Improve the Efficiency of Justice] (in Russian) // Journal of Russian Law. 2005. No. 12.
Sherstyuk V.M. Deystvuyuschy APK RF – etap v razvitii arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation – the Stage in the Development of Arbitration Procedural Law] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2012. No. 6.
Danilenko P.I. Zakonnaya sila sudebnogo resheniya v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Enforceability of a Judgment in the Arbitration Process] (in Russian) // Economic Justice in the Far East Russia. 2009. May. No. 3; Aug. No. 4.
Kochanenko E.P. Reshenie, prinimaemoe arbitrazhnym sudom po rezul’tatam rassmotreniya dela v poryadke uproschennogo proizvodstva: poryadok vyneseniya, trebovaniya k forme i soderzhaniyu [Decision Made by the Arbitral Tribunal on the Consideration of the Case by Summary Procedure: Order Issuance, the Requirements for the Form and Content] (in Russian) // Attorney. March. No. 3. Polonsky B.Ya. Kommentarii k postanovleniyam Prezidiuma VAS RF [Commentaries to the Decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // Arbitration Justice in Russia. 2007. Apr. No. 4.
Makarova O.V. Obespechenie nezavisimosti sudey v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Ensuring the Independence of Judges in the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // Journal of Russian Law. 2010. Jan. No. 1.
Zagaynova S.K. Ustranenie nepolnoty sudebnykh aktov v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Incomplete Elimination of Judicial Decisions in the Arbitration Process] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2007. Jan. No. 1.
Sablin M.T. Vzyskanie dolgov: ot profilaktiki do prinuzhdeniya: prakticheskoe rukovodstvo po upravleniyu debitorskoy zadolzhennost’yu [Debt Collection: From Prevention to Enforcement: A Practical Guide to the Management of Accounts Receivable] (in Russian). M., 2011.
Vinnichenko N.A., Smirnov A.F. Kommentary k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve» ot 2 oktyabrya 2007 goda No. 229-FZ [Commentary to the Federal Law «On Enforcement Proceedings» from October 2, 2007 No. 229-FZ] (in Russian). M., 2009. Kommentary k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateyny) [Commentary to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (itemized)] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. 3rd ed. M., 2011. Dolgopolov O.I. Kommentary k Postanovleniyu Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda RF ot 28 maya 2009 g. No. 36 «O primenenii Arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii pri rassmotrenii del v arbitrazhnom sude apellyatsionnoy instantsii»[Commentary to the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation on May 28, 2009 No. 36 «On the Application of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in Cases before the Arbitration Court of Appeal»] (in Russian) // Tax Bulletin: Comments on the Regulations for Accountants. 2009. Aug. No. 8.
Ivanova O.V. Ponyatie lits, ne uchastvovavshikh v dele, prava kotorykh narusheny resheniem suda: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Concept of Persons Not Involved in the Case, Whose Rights Have Been Violated by a Court Decision: Theory and Practice] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2009. Aug. No. 8.
Information about the author
Khasanshin I.A. (Kazan) – Judge of the Commercial («Arbitrazh») Court of the Republic of Tatarstan (420014, Kazan city, Kremlin, building 1, entrance 2; e-mail: [email protected]).
I.A. Khasanshin
Advertisement
Our partners
