We in a citing index:
New Problems of Proof in Light of the Modernization of Civil Proceedings
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure
and Business Law of the Samara State University
Article is devoted to the topical issues of proof in light of the modernization of the civil justice system. He author notes that in the conditions of intensive reform of procedural law is not always given due attention to evolutionarity produced changes. Modernization of civil litigation in signiIcant problems of evidence, put it, according to the author, to the emergence of evidence. For that do not require the procedural activity of both parties, the court may independently obtain such evidence without making any eJort on their parties. Proving of modeled activity that already considered by the case relating to the legal position of the Supreme Court and of the binding generates a completely new evidentiary activity that is need for real proof of conformity with the circumstances of the case on already considered circumstances on the case under consideration. As an example of original sources, such evidentiary information can be called institutions of «out of procedural appeals» and «friends of the court». He «out of procedural appeals» is deIned as «received by the judge on the case while it is in its production, or president of the court, his deputy, the chairman of the court or the chairman of the board on cases pending in the court, an appeal in writing or orally that are not parties to the proceedings of public authority, local authority, other body, organization, official or citizen».
Keywords: civil litigation; arbitration process; proving; modernization.
Sentsov I.A. GPK RF: desyat’ let v dvizhenii [The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: ten years on the move (analysis of changes and additions at the period from 2003 to 2013)] (in Russian) // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2013. No. 4. P. 229–253.
Zhilin G.A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual’nye voprosy: Monografiya [Justice in civil matters: current issues: Monograph] (in Russian). M., 2010. P. 22–23.
Praktika primeneniya Arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federacii [The practice of applying of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) / Ed. by I.V. Reshetnikova. M., 2012. P. 104.
Baulin O.V. Bremya dokazyvaniya pri razbiratel’stve grazhdanskih del [The burden of proof in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2004. P. 25.
Bonner A.T. Tradicionnye i netradicionnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe: Monografiya [Traditional and non-traditional means of proof in civil and arbitration proceedings: Monograph] (in Russian). M., 2013. P. 527.
Vorozhbit S.P. Jelektronnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processe [Electronic means of proof in civil and arbitration proceedings] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2011. P. 9–10.
Yudin A.V. Problemy vzaimosvyazannosti grazhdanskih del [Problems of interre- latedness of civil cases] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013. No. 8. P. 46–56.
Vitkina Yu., Rodionov A. Nalogovye prestupniki jepohi Putina. Kto oni? [Tax cri- minals at Putin era. Who are they?] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 29.
Malyukina A.V. Koncentraciya processa – osnova svoevremennogo i pravil’nogo rassmotreniya grazhdanskogo dela [Concentration process – base of timely and proper consideration of the civil case] (in Russian). M., 2009. P. 47.
Vas’kovsky E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa [Textbook of civil procedure] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. P. 241.
Yudin A.V. Pravovoj rezhim processual’nyh dokumentov, ishodyashhih ot lic, uchast- vuyushhih v dele, i ne yavlyayushhihsya dokazatel’stvami po grazhdanskim delam [Legal regime of procedural documents emanating from persons involved in the case, and is not evidence in civil cases] (in Russian) // Judge. 2013. No. 4. P. 27–32.
Yudin A.V. Vneprocessual’nye obrashheniya po grazhdanskim delam: ponyatie, vidy, poryadok raskrytiya i posledstviya [Non-procedural treatment in civil cases: concept, types, procedure and consequences of disclosure] (in Russian) // Law. 2013. No. 10.
Sultanov A.R. Evropejskie pravovye standarty, uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naya praktika [European legal standards, lessons of history and law practice] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 203.
Afanas’ev S.F. Recenziya na knigu A.R. Sultanova «Evropejskie pravovye standarty, uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naya praktika» [Review of A.R. Sultanov’s book «European legal standards, lessons of history and law practice»] (in Russian) // Herald of Сivil Pro- cedure. 2013. No. 1. P. 303.
Shinkareckaya G.G. «Pis’ma druzej suda» v praktike mezhdunarodnogo suda [«Let- ters from friends of the court» in the practice of the international court] (in Russian) // State and Law. 2012. No. 5. P. 79.
Budanova M.A. Processual’nye l’goty v dokazyvanii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvod- stve [Procedural benefits of proof in civil proceedings] (in Russian): Abstract of Dis- sertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2011. P. 25.
Reshetnikova I.V. Kurs dokazatel’stvennogo prava v rossijskom grazhdanskom sudo- proizvodstve [The course of the law of evidence in Russian civil proceedings] (in Rus- sian). M., 2000. P. 133.
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel’stva. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop [Judicial eviden- ces. 4th ed., rev. and exp.] (in Russian). M., 2005. P. 22–23.
Yarkov V.V. Juridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 154–171.
Abolonin V.O. Fiktivnye sudebnye processy – nereshennaya problema grazhdansko- go processual’nogo prava [Fictitious lawsuits – the unsolved problem of civil procedural law] (in Russian) // Russian Judge. 2011. No. 5. P. 5–7.
Yudin A.V. Zloupotreblenie processual’nymi pravami v grazhdanskom sudoproiz- vodstve [Abuse of procedural rights in civil proceedings] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 2005. P. 195–197.
Amosov S. Bremya dokazyvaniya v arbitrazhnom processe [The burden of proof in the arbitration process] (in Russian) // Russian Justice. 1998. No. 5. P. 21–22.
Yablochkov T.M. K ucheniyu ob osnovnyh principah grazhdanskogo processa [Towards the teaching about the basic principles of civil procedure] (in Russian) // Collection of articles on civil and commercial law. In Memoriam of Professor Gabriel Felixovich Shershenevich. M., 2005. P. 422–423.
Information about the author
Yudin A.V. (Samara) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law of the Samara State University (443011, Samara city, Academic Pavlov st., 1a, e-mail: email@example.com).