Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

The Need for Legal Propaganda in Civil Process: Theoretical and Practical Analysis

 E.N. Toguzaeva,
 Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor, Head of the Department 
of Civil Law and Procedure of the Saratov State University 

M.N. Zarubina,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor of the Department 
of Civil Law and Procedure of the Saratov State University


In the article authors prove the need for legal propaganda in civil proceedings. Analyzed the objectives, functions and methods of its application. Authors mark out that demonstration of the fair trial which has been carried out in due time and perfectly from the point of view of ethical and moral reasons, is the conductor between the constitutional state and civil society, level of trust of judicial authority is one of the most important indicators of effciency of justice in the different states. Now the most important indicators of effciency of judicial activity are the quantity of the cancelled (changed) judgments, terms of carrying out judicial proceedings, material and technical security of justice and so forth; the problem of the moral fundamentals by implementation of justice was moved on the sidelines. It is very important when carrying out legal promotion to sum up judicial proceedings ather announcement of the total act of justice, to draw certain conclusions concerning behavior of participants of process, paying attention to the moral values mentioned by consideration of a civil case. Preventive function of legal promotion is expressed, according to authors, in removal of private definitions, and also in hindrance to participants of process in abuse of procedural laws. 

Keywords: civil process; propaganda; moral and ethic aspects of civil procedure.


References 

     Degtyarev S.L. Realizaciya sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve (teoretiko-prikladnye problemy) [Implementation of the judiciary in civil matters (theoretical and applied problems)] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, 2008. P. 25. 
    Osokina G.L. Grazhdansky process. Osobennaya chast’ [Civil proceedings. The Particular part] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 90–102.     
    Vas’kovsky E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa [Textbook of civil procedure] (in Russian). M., 1917. P. 17. 
    Yaroslavtsev V.G. Nravstvennoe pravosudie i sudejskoe pravotvorchestvo [Moral justice and judicial lawmaking] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 23. 
    Osnovin V.S., Hodyrevsky S.M. Povyshenie jeffektivnosti pravovoj propagandy [Improving the efficiency of legal advocacy] (in Russian) // Jurisprudence. 1977. No. 2. P. 84–88. 
    Besso K. Ital’yansky nacional’ny doklad [Italian national report] (in Russian) // Civil Procedure in Cross-cultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context: IAPL World Conference on Civil Procedure, September 18–21, 2012, Moscow, Russia: Conference Book / Ed. by Dmitry Maleshin; International Association of Procedural Law. M., 2012. P. 333. 
    Velichko A.N., Shatilovich S.N. Profilakticheskaya deyatel’nost’ rossijskogo suda posredstvom uchastiya v pravovoj propagande sredi naseleniya [Prevention activities of the Russian court by engaging in legal advocacy among the population] (in Russian) // Russian Judge. 2008. No. 8. P. 30–36. 
   Romanov V., Myakishev G. Neobhodimo vosstanovit’ sistemu pravovoj propagandy [Necessary to restore the system of legal advocacy] (in Russian) // Russian Justice. 2002. No. 11. P. 38. 
   Velichko A.N., Shatilovich S.N. Osobennosti uchastiya rossijskogo suda v pravovoj propagande sredi naseleniya v sovremennyh usloviyah [Features of Russian court’s participation in legal advocacy among the population under current conditions] (in Rus- sian) // Jurisprudence and Law Practice. 2007. No. 2(3). P. 60. 
   Koni A.F. Nravstvennye nachala v ugolovnom processe (Obshhie cherty sudebnoj jetiki) [Moral principles in the criminal process (Common features of judicial ethics)] (in Russian) // Koni A.F. Selected works. M., 1956. P. 15. 
   Yudin A.V. Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost’: Monografiya [Civil procedure offense and responsibility: Monograph] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 2009. P. 346–349. 
   Arsen’ev O.V. O roli chastnyh opredelenij v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The role of particular rulings in civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Chelyabinsk State University Review. 2005. No. 1. P. 100–103. 
   Zajtsev I.M. Kassacionnye opredeleniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom processual’nom prave [Cassational ruling in the Soviet civil procedural law] (in Russian). Saratov, 1967. P. 7. 

Information about the authors 

    Toguzaeva E.N. (Saratov) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Saratov State University (410012, Saratov city, Astrakhanskaya st., 83, e-mail: belana1@yandex.ru). 

    Zarubina M.N. (Saratov) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Saratov State University (410012, Saratov city, Astrakhanskaya st., 83, e-mail: 17mz84@mail.ru).


 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

E.N. Toguzaeva, M.N. Zarubina