We in a citing index:
About Situation in Executive Production of the Person Acting in Others Interest
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department
of Civil Procedure of the Moscow State Law Academy
In article is analyzed procedural position of the person acting in other interest in enforcement proceedings. He construction of the current legislation assumes that public interests, the rights and interests of an uncertain circle of people and the particular persons who don’t have opportunities to protect in court the interests independently, during trial can be protected by the prosecutor and public authorities, local government and public organizations. Heir participation in process – and this opinion is a common feeling – acts as an additional guarantee of protection of the rights and public interests protected by the law. He fact of the direction of the executive document to the collecting made by court is frequently not enough in order to protect individual rights in enforcement proceedings: also, as in judicial proceedings, during compulsory execution active participation of interested persons, Irst of all, a creditor is required. It turns out that the prosecutor and other persons have the right to initiate proceedings in protection of interests of the Russian Federation, territorial subjects of the Russian Federation, municipalities or separate categories of citizens, but has no right to bring this protection to the logical end, i.e. before decision execution. Similar restriction contradicts the principle of legality, problems of activity of appropriate authorities, the organizations and persons, the purposes of their participation in process. Participation of government bodies and local governments in enforcement proceedings in the form of the introduction in already begun process of execution as also necessary on the bases similar to motives of participation of the prosecutor in enforcement proceedings.
Keywords: enforcement proceedings; participation of the prosecutor in enforcement proceedings; participation of government bodies in enforcement proceedings.
Valeev D.Kh. Processual’noe polozhenie lic, uchastvuyushhih v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Procedural status of the persons involved in the enforcement proceedings] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Kazan’, 1999.
Valeev D.Kh. Processual’nye garantii prav grazhdan i organizacij v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [The procedural guarantees of the rights of citizens and organizations in the enforcement proceedings] (in Russian). Kazan’, 2001.
Morozova I.B. Sub#ekty ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva [Subjects of enforcement proceedings] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 1999.
Gukasyan R.E. Problema interesa v sovetskom grazhdanskom processual’nom prave [The problem of interest in the Soviet civil procedural law] (in Russian). Saratov, 1970. P. 55.
Semyonova A.A. K voprosu ob uchastii prokurora v ispolnenii sudebnyh reshenij po delam, svyazannym s primeneniem posledstvij priznaniya nedejstvitel’nymi sdelok po otchuzhdeniyu zhilyh pomeshhenij [On the question of the participation of the prosecutor in the execution of judgments in cases involving the application of the consequences of invalidating transactions for the disposal of residential premises] (in Russian) // Executive Law. 2010. No. 4. P. 18–20.
Valeev D.H. Sistema processual’nyh garantij prav grazhdan i organizacij v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [The system of procedural guarantees of the rights of citizens and organizations in the enforcement proceedings] (in Russian). M., 2009. P. 239–244.
Tikhomirova Yu.V. Proizvodstvo po delam o prinuditel’noj gospitalizacii grazhdanina v psihiatrichesky stacionar i prinuditel’nom psihiatricheskom osvidetel’stvovanii [Proceedings on involuntary admission of a citizen in a psychiatric hospital and forced psychiatric examination] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2004. P. 33.
Yarkov V.V. Kommentary k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve» (postatejny) i k Federal’nomu zakonu «O sudebnyh pristavah» [Commentary to the Federal Law «On Enforcement Proceedings» (item-by-item) and to the Federal Law «On Bailiffs»] (in Russian). M., 1999. P. 153.
Formy zashhity prav investorov v sfere rynka cennyh bumag [Forms of protection of the rights of investors in the securities market] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. M., 2000. P. 193–195.
Gros’ A.A., Dedov D.I. Problemy realizacii kosvennyh iskov [The problems of implementation of indirect actions] (in Russian) // Law. 2007. No. 3.
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 278–280.
Eliseev N.G. Processual’ny status akcionernogo obshhestva v proizvodstve po kosvennomu isku [Procedural status of the joint-stock company in the production of the indirect lawsuit] (in Russian) (http://www.szrf.ru/doc.phtml?nb=00_07&issid=20 05008000&docid=29).
Gureev V.A. Problemy zashhity prav i interesov akcionerov v Rossijskoj Federacii [The problems of protection of the rights and interests of shareholders in the Russian Federation] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 153.
Information about the author
Streltsova E.G. (Moskow) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Moscow State Law Academy (123995, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya st., 9, e-mail: email@example.com).