R.V. Shakiryanov,

The article is dedicated to the increasing role of the efficiency at the courts of appeal for the protection of the rights of persons that is not involved in the case, but whose rights have been violated by the decision of the court. The article suggests ways to further improve of the work of appellate courts in this area. The author notes that this kind of situation in the manufacture of courts of general jurisdiction bit, but the structure of the rules considered by the full appeal cases in their number is significant. In addition, the presence in the domestic proceedings due process rights of these persons is a measure of efficiency of justice, matching the current civil procedural law generally accepted by European standards. Jurisprudence indicates that, as a rule, the rights of persons not involved in the trial court, are violated in approving the settlement agreements, decisions in the recognition of the claim by the defendants. Therefore, in these cases, the courts must carefully examine specifically the question of whether the adoption is not affected by the recognition of the claim decision, approved the settlement agreement of the rights of other citizens.

 

Keywords: appeal process; non-contesting party; third party in the case.

References 

    Prikhod’ko I.A. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom processe: osnovnye problemy [Access to justice in civil litigation and arbitration: the main problems] (in Russian). M., 2005. P. 631. 

    Rekhtina I.V. Problemy sudebnoj zashhity prav i zakonnyh interesov lic, ne uchastvovavshih v dele [The problems of the judicial protection of the rights and legitimate interests of the persons who did not participate in the case] (in Russian) // Lawyer. 2008. No. 6. P. 23. 

    Masaladzhiu R.M. O vozmozhnosti lic, ne uchastvovavshih v dele, obzhalovat’ sudebnyj akt, narushayushhij ih prava, v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom processah [On the possibility of persons not involved in the case to appeal against the judicial act that violates their rights, in civil and arbitration processes] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2010. No. 4. P. 19. 

    Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam [Checking judgments in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2006. P. 168, 177. 

    Nikanorov S.Yu. Litsa, ne uchastvovavshie v dele kak sub#ekty obzhalovaniya sudebnyh postanovlenij v poryadke nadzora po GPK RF [Persons who did not participate in the case appeal as the subjects of court orders in the order of supervision under the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2008. No. 7. P. 78. 

    Sultanov A.R. Preyudiciya, res iudicata i obzhalovanie [Collateral estoppel, res iudicata and appeal] (in Russian) // ej-Lawyer. 2010. No. 29. P. 31. 

    Alijeskerov M.A. Problemy kassacionnogo proizvodstva po grazhdanskim delam [The problems of cassation proceeding in civil cases] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2000. P. 12. 

    Ivanova O.V. Litsa, ne privlechennye k uchastiyu v dele, prava kotoryh narusheny resheniem suda [Persons not involved in the case, whose rights are violated a court decision] (in Russian). M., 2010. P. 111. 

    Terekhova L.A. Sistema peresmotra sudebnyh aktov v mekhanizme sudebnoj zashhity [The system of review of judicial acts in the mechanism of judicial protection] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 180. 

    Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 415.     

    Baranova E.V. Zashhita prav lic, ne privlechennyh k uchastiyu v dele: problemy teorii i praktiki [Protecting the rights of persons not involved in the case: theoretical and practical problems] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2008. P. 98–100.    

    Terekhova L.A. Sistema peresmotra sudebnyh aktov v mehanizme sudebnoj zashhity [The system of review judicial acts in the mechanism of judicial protection] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 180. 

    Borisova E.A. Apellyaciya v grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) processe [An appeal in a civil (arbitrazh) process] (in Russian). M., 2000. P. 79.

 Information about the author 

   

     Shakiryanov R.V. (Kazan) – Сandidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court of Republic of Tatarstan (420015, Kazan city, Pushkin st., 72/2, e-mail: rakat51@ mail.ru).