We in a citing index:
The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Ten Years on the Move (analysis of changes and additions at the period from 2003 to 2013)
The author analyzes how varied the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in 2002 for the first ten years of its existence. During this period, it was adopted more than forty federal laws that made changes or additions to the Code. All changes can be devided into the several groups. The first group – is the so-called «technical» amendments to the procedural law which are of a technical nature, since, as a rule, are the result of material changes in legislation. This category may include the following amendments: for example, the exclusion of arts. 89, 120 and 122 of the RF CPC references to the tax authorities of the police because of the abolition of these state bodies. The second group of amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation – is a federal law aimed at eliminating errors that have been legalized in the original version of Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, for example, art. 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure added the third part of the norm, according to which the court for a particular case is formed by taking into account the load and specialization of judges in order to exclude the impact of individuals interested in the outcome of the trial, including the use of automated information systems. In a separate third group of amendments to the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation is joined the so-called «ballot amendments» – four federal laws that adjusts the electoral law and the ch. 26 of the Russian Code of Civil Procedure. In conclusion, the author notes the desire that procedural law has evolved towards a more effective mechanism to protect the rights of the persons concerned, and not to create a more extensive, clumsy, but «stable» judicial system.
Keywords: Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation; amendments.
Treushnikov M.K. Vzgljad na Grazhdanskij processual’nyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii cherez prizmu pjatiletnej praktiki [A look at the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation through the prism of a five-year practice] (in Russian) // Civil procedure: theory and practice. M., 2008. P. 345.
Lebedev V.M. Sudebnaja zashhita rassmatrivaetsja grazhdanami kak prioritetnaja [Judicial protection of citizens is regarded as a priority] (in Russian) // Kommersant#. 2012. Dec. 17. No. 238/P (5023).
Byval’ceva S.G. Zashhita prav i svobod cheloveka [Protection of human rights and freedoms] (in Russian) // Legality. 2009. No. 9. P. 20–22.
Bajkin I.M. Realizacija prava nesovershennoletnego na sudebnuju zashhitu pri pred#javlenii iska prokurorom [The implementation of the juvenile’s right to judicial protection when suing attorney] (in Russian) // Legality. 2008. No. 4. P. 27–29.
Afanas’ev S.F., Borisova V.F. Nekotorye problemy uchastija prokurora v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve s cel’ju zashhity prav i zakonnyh interesov drugih lic [Some problems of the prosecutor’s participation in civil proceedings in order to protect the rights and lawful interests of other persons] (in Russian) // The Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, and Practice. 2012. No. 9. P. 46–51.
Zarubina M.N. O nekotoryh voprosah otnesenija proizvodstva o prisuzhdenii kompensacii za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyj srok i prava na ispolnenie sudebnogo postanovlenija v razumnyj srok k iskovomu vidu grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Some issues related production for compensation for the violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time and the right to execute the judgment within a reason able time to the claim form of civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 2. P. 25–29.
Artebjakina N.A. K voprosu o nekotoryh narushenijah priemov pravotvorcheskoj tehniki v grazhdanskom processual’nom zakonodatel’stve (na primere glavy 22.1 GPK RF) [On certain violations of the law-making techniques technology in civil procedure law (exemlified by Chapter 22.1 of the Civil Procedure Code)] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2012. No. 2. P. 46–47.
Vidy grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: Ucheb. posobie dlja studentov vuzov, obuchajushhihsja po napravleniju «Jurisprudencija» i special’nosti «Jurisprudencija» [Types of Civil Procedure: Manual] (in Russian) / Ed. by O.V. Baulin, E.I. Nosyreva. M., 2012. P. 42–43.
Afanas’ev S.F., Zajcev A.I. Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo: Uchebnik dlja bakalavrov [Civil Procedural Law: Textbook for bachelors] (in Russian). M., 2013. P. 453–454.
Simonjan S.L. O razvitii administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva na sovremennom jetape [On the development of the administrative proceedings at the present stage] (in Russian) // Russian Justice. 2011. No. 7. P. 27–30.
Vel’min A.S. Problemy obosnovannosti otnesenija del ob administrativnom nadzore k vedeniju suda v porjadke grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Problems of validity of assignment of cases on administrative supervision to the conduct of the court in civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2012. No. 2. P. 235–251.
Argunov V.V. Proizvodstvo po delam ob administrativnom nadzore – novaja kategorija del v ramkah grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Proceedings on administrative supervision – a new category of cases in civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Legal World. 2012. No. 6. P. 32–40.
Jarkov V.V. Juridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil procedure] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 387.
Borisova E.A. Reformirovanie processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva: nastojashhee i budushhee [The reform of procedural law: present and future] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 4. P. 36–40.