We in a citing index:
Submission of Additional (New) Evidence to the Court of Appeal: the Historical and Legal Analysis of Contemporary Issues (the 10th Anniversary of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation)
R.V. Shakiryanov,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan,
Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the further formation of appeal in the courts of general jurisdiction, the submission of additional (new) evidence in a court of second instance in connection to the fact of entered in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation changes of the existing jurisprudence. Historically, the 1864 Charter of Civil Procedure introduced incomplete appellation in Russia, but in practice it has transformed into a full appeal. However, the implementation in practice mode of full appeal implied the possibility of representing the parties and taking evidence in the court of second instance without restrictions. Therefore, such evidence shall be taken and considered by the Trial Chamber who based their actions on the decisions of the Civil Cassation Department of the Governing Senate. After 1917, the possibility of presenting new evidence to the court of second instance is not directly regulated, but the ban was absent. The question of the legality and validity of solutions discussed on the basis of data collected by the court of first instance and available in the case. Due to the fact that the legislation provided restrictions for the submission of new evidence for persons involved in the case, there was no resolution of this issue depended entirely on the discretion of the court. Later, the practice was formed, under which additional materials submitted by the parties and requested by the court itself can not serve as a basis for change or giving a new decision by the court of second instance, because they have not been the subject of investigation by the court of first instance with the participation of all stakeholders and compliance with statutory regulations. At the present stage of development of civil procedure as in the stage of transition to the appeal proceedings under the rules of the court of first instance in determining whether other violations of procedural rights under Part 4 of Art. 330 Code of Civil Procedure occurred, all presented additional evidence shall be admitted without restriction.
Keywords: civil action; the court of appeal (second) instance; the presentation of additional (new) evidence; the history of civil process.
References
Abramov S.N. O novyh materialah pri rassmotrenii grazhdanskih del v kassacionnom porjadke [About the new materials in civil cases in a cassation order] (in Russian) // Jurisprudence. 1961. No. 3. P. 15.
Trubnikov P.Ja. Peresmotr v porjadke sudebnogo nadzora reshenij, opredelenij i postanovlenij v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [Revision of the judicial review of decisions, rulings and orders in the Soviet civil process] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1969. P. 30–31.
Ivanov O.V. Dokazyvanie v grazhdanskom processe [Proof in civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Soviet Justice. 1965. No. 8. P. 23.
Abros’kina E.I., Shubina O.L. Princip sostjazatel’nosti v arbitrazhnom processe: teorija i praktika [The adversarial principle in the arbitration process: theory and practice] (in Russian) // Arbitration Disputes. 2008. No. 1. P. 19.
Aliev T., Gromov N., Tsareva N. Dopolnitel’nye materialy v sudah kassacionnoj i nadzornoj instancij [Additional materials in the courts of cassation and supervisory authorities] (in Russian) // Russian Judge. 2003. No. 1. P. 27.
Alijeskerov M.A. Kassacionnoe proizvodstvo po grazhdanskim delam: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Cassation proceeding in civil cases: theory and practice] (in Russian). M., 2005. P. 102.
Baulin O.V. Bremja dokazyvanija pri razbiratel’stve grazhdanskih del [The burden of proof in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2004. P. 27.
Bekov Ja.H. Podgotovka dela k sudebnomu razbiratel’stvu v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: monografija [Preparation of cases for trial in civil proceedings: monograph] (in Russian). M., 2010. P. 67.
Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam [Checking of judicial acts in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2008. P. 119. Vas’kovskij E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa [Textbook of civil procedure] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. P. 34–35.
Vikut M.A., Zajtsev I.M. Grazhdanskij process: Kurs lekcij [Civil procedure: Lectures] (in Russian). Saratov, 1998. P. 279.
Gojdenko E.G. O polnomochijah kassacionnoj instancii po otmene sudebnyh reshenij [On the powers of appeal for the repeal of judicial decisions] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2003. No. 8. P. 23.
Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo Rossii: Uchebnik. [Russian civil procedural law: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by M. S. Shakarjan. M.,1998. P. 357.
Gureev P.P. K voprosu o sushhnosti dokazatel’stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [To a question about the nature of the evidence in the Soviet civil process] (in Russian) // Soviet State and Law. 1966. No. 8. P. 55.
Kurs sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava: V 2 t. [The course of Soviet civil procedural law: In 2 vols.] (in Russian). Vol 2. M., 1981. P. 487.
Degtjarev L.S. Realizacija sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: teoretikoprikladnye problemy [Implementation of the judiciary in civil matters: theoretical and applied problems] (in Russian). M., 2007. P. 48.
Vas’kovskij E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa [Textbook of civil procedure] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. P. 285.
Zhilin G.A. Podgotovka grazhdanskih del k rassmotreniju v sude kassacionnoj instancii [Preparation of civil cases for examination by the court of cassation] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, 1991. P. 15.
Zhujkov V.M. Novoe v grazhdanskom processual’nom prave (Kommentarij zakonodatel’stva) [New in the law of civil procedure (Comment on legislation)] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 3. P. 12.
Zhujkov V.M. Problemy grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava [Problems of civil procedure] (in Russian). M., 1995. P. 45.
Zhujkov V.M. Sudebnaja reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiju [Judicial reform: the problem of access to justice] (in Russian). M., 2006. P. 84.
Zajtsev I.M. Ustranenie sudebnyh oshibok v grazhdanskom processe [Elimination of miscarriages of justice in civil proceedings] (in Russian). Saratov, 1990. P. 47.
Komissarov K.I. Posledovatel’noe progressivnoe razvitie sovetskogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo prava [Consistent progressive development of Soviet civil procedural law] (in Russian) // Problems of action and improvement of Soviet civil procedural law. Sverdlovsk, 1982. P. 9.
Kipkaeva N.V. O polnoj apelljacii i polnomochijah suda apelljacionnoj instancii v svete novogo grazhdanskogo processual’nogo regulirovanija [On full appeal and powers of the court of appeal in the light of the new Civil Procedure Regulation] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 8. P. 17.
Klejnman A.F. Osnovnye voprosy teorii dokazatel’stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [The main problems of the theory of evidence in the Soviet civil process] (in Russian). M., 1950. P. 69.
Judel’son K.S. Sovetskij grazhdanskij process [Soviet civil procedure]. M., 1956. P. 350.
Komissarov K.I. Processual’naja priroda novyh materialov, predstavljaemyh v sud nadzornoj instancii [The procedural nature of the new materials to be submitted to the supervisory review court] (in Russian) // Collection of scientific works of the Sverdlovsk Law Institute. Issue 10. Sverdlovsk, 1969.
Lesnickaja L.F. Osnovanija k otmene obzhalovannyh sudebnyh reshenij [Grounds for the repeal of the appealed judgment] (in Russian). M., 1962. P. 108.
Kozhemjako A.S. Kassacionnoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom sude: teorija i praktika [Cassation proceeding in the court of arbitration: theory and practice] (in Russian). M., 2004. P. 117.
Kozlov A.S. Ponjatie i priznaki sudebnyh dokazatel’stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [The concept and features of forensic evidence in the Soviet civil process] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, 1999. P. 16.
Molchanov V.V. Neobhodimye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Necessary evidence in civil proceedings] (in Russian) // Legislation. 2006. No. 3. P. 16.
Rubeko G.L., Kolesnichenko E.A. Neobhodimye dokazatel’stva kak sredstva sudebnogo dokazyvanija v arbitrazhnom processe [The necessary evidence as a means of legal evidence in the arbitration process] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 11. P. 23.
Komissarov K.I. Polnomochija suda vtoroj instancii v grazhdanskom processe [The powers of the court of second instance in civil proceedings] (in Russian). M., 1961. P. 85.
Kommentarij k postanovlenijam Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF po grazhdanskim delam [Commentary to decrees of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in civil matters] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.M. Zhujkov. M., 1999. P. 517.
Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam [Checking judgments in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2006. P. 121.
Kommentarij k Arbitrazhnomu processual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii [Comments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) / Ed. by G.A. Zhilin. 2nd ed. M., 2005. P. 652–653.
Kuras T.L. K voprosu o predostavlenii dopolnitel’nyh dokazatel’stv v sud apelljacionnoj instancii: istoricheskij analiz i sovremennye aspekty [On the question of additional evidence to the court of appeal: a historical analysis and contemporary aspects] (in Russian) // Siberian Law Bulletin. 2001. No. 31. P. 52.
Lesnickaja L.F. Peresmotr reshenija suda v kassacionnom porjadke [Revision of the decision by the court of cassation] (in Russian). M., 1974. P. 105. Mikhajlov S.I. Ocenka dokazatel’stv sudom vtoroj instancii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Evaluation of the evidence by the court of second instance in civil proceedings] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Scienses. M., 2001. P. 130.
Nosenko D.A. Ocherki po grazhdanskomu processu [Essays on the civil procedure] (in Russian) // Journal of the Ministry of Justice. 1903. No. 10. P. 35–37.
Diordieva O.N. Predvaritel’noe sudebnoe zasedanie v grazhdanskom processe [A preliminary hearing in the civil trial] (in Russian) // Magistrate. 2005. No. 6. P. 25.
Shakir’janov R.V. Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo, shagi po optimizacii grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: izmenenija v GPK RF [The appeal proceedings, efforts to optimize the civil justice: changes in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2010. No. 3–4.
Sherstjuk V.M. Kommentarij k postanovlenijam Plenuma Vysshego Arbitrazhnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii po voprosam arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo prava [Commentary to decrees of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation on the arbitration law] (in Russian). M., 2000. P. 95.
Judin A.V. Zloupotreblenie processual’nymi pravami v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The abuse of procedural rights in civil proceedings] (in Russian). M., 2005. P. 292.
Jukov M.K. Sovremennye problemy razvitija arbitrazhno-processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Modern problems of development of arbitration and procedural legislation] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 1999. No. 2. P. 4.
Jablochkov T.M. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian civil proceedings] (in Russian). 2nd ed. Jaroslavl’, 1912. P. 224.
Jarkov V.V. Juridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil procedure] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 59.
Information about the author
Shakiryanov R.V. (Kazan) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (420015, Kazan city, Pushkin st., 72/2, e-mail: [email protected]).
R.V. Shakiryanov
Advertisement
Our partners
