Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Law and Economics as a Prospective Method of Civil Procedure Research

S.A. Kurochkin,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure 
of the Ural State Law Academy

The presented article is an attempt to show the perspectives of economic analysis of law application as a method of legal phenomena’s investigation in the Russian Federation by the example of contemporary civil procedure. A brief review of Law and Economics essence, its varieties and role in civil procedure analysis is given. As a result some conclusions on methods of increasing Russian civil litigation efficiency are offered.

Keywords: civil litigation; civil procedure; Law and Economics; effectiveness; system.


References 

    Khabrieva T.Y. Economic and legal analysis: a methodological approach // World of Law. 2010. No. 12. P. 6. 
   Kerimov D.A. Methodology of law: the object, function, problems in the philosophy of law. M., 2003. P. 498. 
   Babaev V.K. Logical problems of socialist law: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1980. P. 11. 
   Avdeenko N.I. Mechanism and extent of regulatory impact of civil procedural law. L., 1969. P. 7.     
  Auzan A.A. and others. The effectiveness of civil proceedings in Russia: institutional analysis and institutional design. M., 2005. P. 9. 
  Maleshin D.Y. Methodology of civil procedure. M., 2010. P. 70. 
  Alekseev S.S. General theory of law. M., 2008. P. 18. Yarkov V.V. Legal facts in civil procedure. M., 2012. P. 535. 
   Fierro H. Courts, Justice and Ecciency: A Socio-Legal Study of Economic Rationality in Adjudication. Oxford, 2003. P. 22. 
   Cabrillo F., Fitzpatrick S. Xe Economics of Courts and Litigation. Cheltenham, 2008. P. 15. 
   Rubin P. Micro and Macro Legal Ecciency: Supply and Demand // Supreme Court Economic Review. 2005. Vol. 13. P. 19. 
  Arndt D. Economic Analysis of Settlements: Civil Procedure Law. Augsburg, 2007. P. 8. 
   Shmakov A.V. Economic Analysis of Law. M., 2011. P. 81. 
  Odintsova M.I. Economics of Law. M., 2007. P. 24. 
  Shavell S. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Harvard, 2004. P. 4. 
  Becker G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, 1990. P. 3–4. 
   Posner R. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Harvard, 1993. P. 353. 
  Posner R. On the application of economic theory and its abuse in the analysis of law // Origins: the economy in the context of history and culture. M., 2004. P. 318, 319. 
  Miller G. The Legal-Economic Analysis of Comparative Civil Procedure // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45. No. 4. P. 906. 
  Posner R. Economic analysis of law: In 2 vols. / Translated from English by A.A. Fofonov; Ed. by V.L. Tambovtsev. St. Petersburg, 2004. Vol. 2. P. 760. 
  Kirchner C. The diccult reception of Law and Economics in Germany // International Review of Law and Economics. 1991. Vol. 11. P. 277–292. 
  Georgakopoulos N. Principles and methods of law and economics: basic tools for normative reasoning. NY, 2005. P. 50–51. 
  Miceli T. The Economic Approach to Law. Stanford, 2004. P. 4. 
  Mogilevsky V.D. Methodology of systems. M., 1999. P. 91. 
 Levin H., Mc Ewan P. Cost-Ebectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 2000. P. 108. 
  Gerlis S., Loughlin P. Civil procedure. L., 2001. P. 6. Grainger I., Fealy M. Xe civil procedure rules in action. L., 2000. P. 21. 
  Fursov D.A., Kharlamova I.V. The theory of justice in a brief three-volume exposition of civil cases. Volume One: Xe theory and practice of organization justice. M., 2009. P. 149–167. 
  Vlasov A.A. Actual problems of ecciency of justice in civil matters // The modern doctrine of civil, arbitrazh and enforcement proceedings: theory and practice: Collected scientific articles. Krasnodar; St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 202–203. 
   Gubenok I.V. Ecciency of justice as a guarantee of protection of rights (theory and practice): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2007. P. 8, 14. 
  Protasov V.N. Xeoretical foundations of law: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1993. P. 24.     
   Sakhnova T.V. About the concept of civil procedure and procedural law // The modern doctrine of civil, arbitrazh and enforcement proceedings: theory and Practice: Collected scientific articles. Krasnodar; St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 75. 
   Pashkov A.S., Fomin E.A., Yavich L.S. Xe ebectiveness of the law. L., 1977. P. 38. 
  Zhinkin S.A. Ebectiveness of the law: anthropological and value dimension: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Krasnodar, 2009. P. 33. 
  Gadjiyev G.A. Cost ecciency, legal ethics and credibility of the state // Journal of Russian Law. 2012. No. 1. P. 13. 

Information about the author 

   Kurochkin S.A. (Ekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy (620137, Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg city, Komsomolskaya st., 21, e-mail: kurochkin@e1.ru).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

S.A. Kurochkin