We in a citing index:
25 YEARS IN THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE AND THE DEBATE ON THE BINDING NATURE OF ECHR RULINGS AGAIN
A.R. SULTANOV,
Head of Legal Department of PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”,
Member of the Association for Better Living and Education (ABLE)
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-6-154-178
The article considers the binding nature of legal positions of the European Court of Human
Rights in civil proceedings taking into account amendments to procedural codes and
substantive laws and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation.
The analysis is carried out to disclose the legislator’s intention, the purpose of which was
to create the “stop-block” against the excessive evolutionary interpretation, rather than to
limit the application of legal positions, stated in the judgments of the ECHR. In conclusion,
the author puts forward the thesis that the recent amendments to the legislation should not
be interpreted as a refusal to implement ECHR judgments, but as an attempt to fix in its
legislation the right to seek compromise in the event of new obligations for Russia from the
evolutionary interpretation of the ECHR Convention. In our opinion, it is appropriate to
quote the President of the Constitutional Court of Germany, who wrote that this approach
is a kind of “stop-cock”, which is most effective when it is not used at all. It is its presence,
not its absence, that avoids an emergency situation. The presence of a “stop-cock” should
not be an obstacle to the protection of human rights and freedoms, nor should it be an
obstacle to the enforcement of ECHR judgments, let alone a justification for violations of
conventional human rights and freedoms.
Keywords: ECHR; evolutionary interpretation; legal positions; protection of human rights
and freedoms; presumption.
References
Cappelletti M. Social and Political Aspects of Civil Procedure: Reforms and Trends in
Western and Eastern Europe. Michigan Law Review, 1971, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 847–886.
Chetvernin V.A. Sovremennye kontseptsii estestvennogo prava [Modern Concepts of
Natural Law]. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. 144 с. (In Russ.)
Entin M.L. Evoliutivnyi podkhod v teorii i praktike ESPCh [The Evolutionary
Approach in the Theory and Practice of the ECtHR]. Internet-zhurnal «Vsia Evropa» –
Internet Journal “All Europe”, 2011, no. 2. (In Russ.)
Fokin E.A., Khabirova D.I., Evropeiskie standarty spravedlivogo sudebnogo
razbiratel’stva: sovremennye vyzovy [European Standards of Fair Trial: Modern Challenges].
Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia – Journal
of Foreign Law and Comparative Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 108–126. (In Russ.)
Gadzhiev Kh. I. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v mezhdunarodnom pravosudii [Judicial
Drafting in International Justice]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo
pravovedeniia – Journal of Foreign Law and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 3(70), pp. 118–
129. (In Russ.)
Gadzhiev Kh.I. Rol’ sudebnoi argumentatsii v evoliutsii zakonodatel’stva i pravoprimeneniia
[The Role of Judicial Reasoning in the Evolution of Legislation and Law Enforcement].
Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 9, pp. 91–105. (In Russ.)
Galperin M.L. Popravki k Konstitutsii i voprosy tolkovaniia v natsional’nom i mezhdunarodnom
pravosudii [Constitutional Amendments and Interpretative Issues in
National and International Justice]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava – Current
Problems of Russian Law, 2020, no. 12, pp. 181–189. (In Russ.)
Ispolinov A.S. Kuda idet sovremennyi investitsionnyi arbitrazh? [Where Is the Modern
Investment Arbitration Going?]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Russian Law Journal,
2015, no. 3, рр. 80–96. (In Russ.)
Ispolinov A.S. Sudy regional’nykh integratsionnykh ob’’edinenii v sisteme mezhdunarodnogo
pravosudiia (na primere Suda ES i Suda EAES): monografiia [Courts of Regional
Integration Groupings in the International Justice System (the Case of the Court of Justice
of the EU and the Court of Justice of the EAEU): Monograph]. Moscow: Iustitsinform,
2018. 312 p. (In Russ.)
Kanashevskii V.A. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [Private International
Law: Textbook]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2016. 1006 р. (In Russ.)
Kokotov A.N. Predvaritel’nyi kontrol’ pravovykh aktov Konstitutsionnym Sudom Rossii
[Preliminary Review of Legal Acts by the Russian Constitutional Court]. Zakon – Law,
2020, no. 12, pp. 29–39. (In Russ.)
Kovler A.I. «Moral’nyi suverenitet» pered litsom «gosudarstvennogo suvereniteta»
v evropeiskoi sisteme zashchity prav cheloveka [“Moral Sovereignty” in the Face of «State
Sovereignty» in the European Human Rights System]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie –
Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, 2013, no. 3(7), pp. 52–63. (In Russ.)
Kovler A.I. Evoliutivnoe tolkovanie Evropeiskoi konventsii po pravam cheloveka: vozmozhnosti
i predely. Evropeiskii sud po pravam cheloveka kak sub”ekt tolkovaniia prava
[Evolutionary Interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights: Possibilities
and Limits. The European Court of Human Rights as a Subject of Legal Interpretation].
Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia – Journal
of Foreign Law and Comparative Law, 2016, no. 3(58), pp. 92–100. (In Russ.)
Kovler A.I. Evropeiskaia konventsiia v mezhdunarodnoi sisteme zashchity prav cheloveka:
monografiia [The European Convention in the International Human Rights System:
Monograph]. Moscow: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the
Government of the Russian Federation; Norma; Infra-M, 2019. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Lipkina N.N. Tolkovanie Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod
Evropeiskim sudom po pravam cheloveka i verkhovenstvo prava [Interpretation of the
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by the
European Court of Human Rights and the Rule of Law]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava –
Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 4(220), pp. 130–142. (In Russ.)
Pokrovskii I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [Key Civil Law Issues]. 4th ed.
Moscow: Statut, 2003. 351 p. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Implementatsiia Postanovlenii ESPCh i o nekotorykh posledstviiakh
Postanovleniia Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 14 iiulia 2015 g. № 21-P [Implementation
of ECtHR Judgments and Some Implications of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
Federation Ruling of 14 July 2015 No. 21-P]. In Tumanov D.A., Zakharova M.V.
(eds.). Sluzhenie pravu: sbornik statei. Pamiati professora V.A. Tumanova posviashchaetsia
[Serving the Law: Collection of Articles. Dedicated to the Memory of Professor
V.A. Tumanov]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017, pp. 169–176. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. K 15-letnemu iubileiu deistviia dlia Rossii Evropeiskoi konventsii o zashchite
prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod ot 4 noiabria 1950 g. i protokolov k nei [On the
15th Anniversary of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and
Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 and its Protocols for Russia]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 4, pp. 280–291. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Novaia vekha v ispolnenii postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam
cheloveka: znachenie i pravovye posledstviia Postanovleniia Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi
Federatsii ot 26 fevralia 2010 goda № 4-P [A New Milestone in the Enforcement of
Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: Meaning and Legal Consequences
of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Ruling of 26 February 2010
No. 4-P]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Review,
2010, no. 4(77), pp. 142–154. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O nekotorykh protsessual’nykh posledstviiakh postanovlenii ESPCh [On
Certain Procedural Consequences of ECtHR Judgments]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia – Russian
Justice, 2014, no. 1, pp. 24–28. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O primenenii sudami Postanovlenii Evropeiskogo suda po pravam
cheloveka [On Application by Courts of Resolutions of the European Court of Human
Rights]. Rossiiskii sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2008, no. 9, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O primenenii sudami postanovlenii Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam
cheloveka [On Application of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights by
Courts]. Rossiiskii sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2008, no. 9, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Peresmotr sudebnykh aktov v sviazi s aktami mezhgosudarstvennykh
organov [Revision of Judicial Acts in Connection with Acts of Interstate Bodies]. Zakon –
Law, 2008, no. 12, pp. 177–183. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Postanovleniia ESPCh v grazhdanskom protsesse: perezagruzka?
[ECtHR Judgments in Civil Procedure: Reloading?]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 6, pp. 69–91. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Pravotvorcheskie oshibki i Evropeiskii Sud po pravam cheloveka [Lawmaking
Mistakes and the European Court of Human Rights]. Rossiiskii sud’ia – Russian
Judge, 2009, no. 3, pp. 40–43. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Pravovye pozitsii postanovlenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF i postanovlenii
ESPCh i ikh pravovoe znachenie dlia grazhdanskogo protsessa [Legal Positions of
Judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Judgments of the
ECtHR and Their Legal Value for Civil Procedure]. Zakonodatel’stvo i ekonomika – Legislation
and Economy, 2011, no. 4, pp. 87–92. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Primenenie teorii okhranitel’nykh pravootnoshenii k zashchite prav i svobod
cheloveka, zashchishchaemykh Evropeiskoi Konventsiei: istoricheskii aspekt [Application
of the Theory of Protective Legal Relations to Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms
Protected by the European Convention: Historical Aspect]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 159–181. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Resheniia Evropeiskogo suda po pravam cheloveka: ukreplenie osnov
rossiiskogo prava? [Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: Strengthening
the Foundations of Russian Law?]. Religiia i pravo – Religion and Law, 2008, no. 3,
pp. 33–36. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Unifikatsiia norm o peresmotre po vnov’ otkryvshimsia obstoiatel’stvam
kak sovershenstvovanie sredstv ispravleniia sudebnoi oshibki [Unification of Norms About
Revision on the Newly Discovered Circumstances as an Improvement of Means of Correction
of a Judicial Error]. Zakon – Law, 2007, no. 11, pp. 99–113. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Vliianie na pravo Rossii Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka
i osnovnykh svobod i pretsedentov Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [The Impact
of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on
Russian Law and the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo
prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2007, no. 12(132), pp. 85–92. (In Russ.)
Voßkuhle A. Multilevel Cooperation of the European Constitutional Courts: Der
Europäische Verfassungsgerichtsverbund. European Constitutional Law Review, 2010,
vol. 6(3), pp. 175–198.
Zorkin V. Bukva i dukh Konstitutsii [The Letter and Spirit of the Constitution]. Rossiiskaia
gazeta – Rossiiskaia Gazeta, 9 October 2018, no. 7689. (In Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie: protsedura i smysl [Constitutional Justice:
Procedure and Meaning]. St. Petersburg: Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation
Publ., 2021. 154 р. (In Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. Konstitutsionnye osnovy razvitiia tsivilizatsii v sovremennom global’nom
mire [Constitutional Foundations for the Development of Civilisation in Today’s Global
World]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2007, no. 4(124), pp. 3–8.
(In Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. Pretsedentnyi kharakter reshenii Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii
[The Precedential Nature of Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian
Federation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2004, no. 12,
pp. 3–9. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
A.R. Sultanov (Nizhnekamsk, Russia) – Head of Legal Department of PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”,
Member of the Association for Better Living and Education (ABLE)
(PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”, Nizhnekamsk, 423574, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Sultanov A.R. 25 let v Sovete Evropy, i snova diskussiia ob obiazatel’nosti postanovlenii
ESPCh [25 Years in the Council of Europe and the Debate on the Binding Nature
of ECHR Rulings Again]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 154–178. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-
11-6-154-178
A.R. SULTANOV