Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

REFLECTING ON THE CONDITION OF THE MODERN CIVIL PROCEDURAL FORM

N.A. ARTEBYAKINA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Law, Pedagogy and Psychology,
Ulyanovsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin

https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-6-95-111

The procedure for any of the types of legal proceedings is strictly regulated by the current
federal law. Arbitrary deviations from the established procedural form are not allowed. Civil
and arbitration proceedings are no exception. All actions of the court, persons participating
in the case, other participants in the proceedings must obey certain rules, deviations from
which are inadmissible in a state governed by the rule of law. Unfortunately, in practice,
such violations are quite common, which are difficult to explain from the point of view
of the law. The author of this article analyzed several examples from judicial practice.
Within the framework of civil proceedings, there is a widespread substitution of concepts:
instead of the legislatively established preliminary court session, the courts hold so-called
«conversations», during which, for some unknown reason, the minutes are not kept. In
addition, attention is focused on several specific examples illustrating the violation of the
civil procedure form. This cannot indicate stability, confidence that the violated rights
and legitimate interests of the subjects will be guaranteed to be protected in the manner
prescribed by law. Departure by anybody from the rules established by federal law is
unacceptable, entails a violation of the principle of legality – the fundamental principle
of all branches of Russian law.

Keywords: civil procedural form; signs of civil procedural form; normativeness of civil
procedural form; compulsory civil procedure; preliminary hearing; “conversation”; court
record; recovery of alimony for minor children in a claim; mutually exclusive judicial acts;
procedure for appealing judicial acts; abuse of judicial power.

References

Afanasieva N.P. Predvaritel’noe sudebnoe zasedanie [Pre-Trial Hearing]. Sovremennoe
pravo – Modern Law, 2008, no. 8. pp. 56–58. (In Russ.)
Artebyakina N.A. …i pravosudie dlia vsekh [...And Justice for All]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 231–247. (In Russ.)
Borisova E.A., Molchanov V.V. Kritika i bibliografiia: Bonner A.T. Problemy ustanovleniia
istiny v grazhdanskom protsesse. SPb.: OOO «Universitetskii izdatel’skii konsortsium
«Iuridicheskaia kniga», 2009 [Criticism and Bibliography: Bonner A.T. Problems of
Establishing the Truth in Civil Proceedings. St. Petersburg: LLC “University Publishing
Consortium ‘Legal Book’”, 2009]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 11. Pravo –
Herald of Moscow University. Series 11. Law, 2010, no. 2, pp. 108–117. (In Russ.)
Borisova V.F. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye stimuli [Civil Procedural Incentives].
In Tumanov S.N. (ed.). Pravo i ego realizatsiia v XXI veke: sbornik nauchnykh trudov
(po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi
80-letiiu Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii, Saratov, 29–30 sentiabria
2011 g.): v 2 ch. Ch. 1 [Law and its Implementation in the 21st Century: Collection of
Scientific Papers (Based on the Materials of the International Scientific and Practical
Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of the Saratov State Law Academy, Saratov,
29–30 September 2011). In 2 parts. Part 1]. Saratov: Saratov State Law Academy
Publishing House, 2011, pp. 291–292. (In Russ.)
Chekmareva A.V. Podgotovitel’nye protsedury v grazhdanskom processe: avtoref.
dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Preparatory Procedures in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2015. 38 p. (In Russ.)
Ferens-Sorotskii A.A. Aksiomy v prave [Axioms in Law]. Pravovedenie – Jurisprudence,
1988, no. 5, pp. 27–31. (In Russ.)
Gorshenev V.M. Protsessual’naia forma i ee naznachenie v sovetskom prave [Procedural
Form and its Purpose in Soviet Law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State
and Law, 1973, no. 12, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)
Kleinman A.F. Voprosy grazhdanskogo protsessa v sviazi s sudebnoi praktikoi [Questions
of Civil Procedure in Relation to Judicial Practice]. Sotsialisticheskaia zakonnost’ –
Socialist Legality, 1946, no. 9, pp. 11–14. (In Russ.)
Kolesnikova M.M., Shumankova N.I. Sravnitel’nyi analiz instituta predvaritel’nogo
sudebnogo zasedaniia v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom i administrativnom protsessakh
[Comparative Analysis of Preliminary Hearing Institute in Civil, Arbitration and
Administrative Procedure]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo imeni V.B. Bobkova
filiala Rossiiskoi tamozhennoi akademii – Academic Notes of Bobkov St. Petersburg Branch
of the Russian Customs Academy, 2018, no. 2(66), pp. 91–94. (In Russ.)
Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.). Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 1:
Obshchaia chast’ [Civil Procedure Law: Textbook. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: General Part]. Moscow:
Statut, 2020. 489 p. (In Russ.)
Provatorova K.V. Protokoly sledstvennykh deistvii i protokoly sudebnykh zasedanii
kak elementy obshchikh uslovii predvaritel’nogo rassledovaniia i sudebnogo razbiratel’stva
[Protocols of Investigative Actions and Protocols of Court Sessions as Elements of General
Conditions of Preliminary Investigation and Court Proceedings]. Vestnik Volgogradskoi
akademii MVD Rossii –Herald of the Volgograd Academy of the Ministry of Internal
Affairs of Russia, 2019, no. 3(50), pp. 125–133. (In Russ.)
Smola A.A., Tai Iu.V. «Sud skoryi, pravyi, milostivyi»: poltora veka v poiskakh aurea
mediocritas [“Court Swift, Right, and Merciful”: A Century and a Half in Search of
Aurea Mediocritas]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018,
no. 1, pp. 346–370. (In Russ.)
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa: v 2 t. T. 1 [Course of Soviet
Criminal Procedure. In 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka, 1968. 468 p. (In Russ.)
Tsepkova T.M. Grazhdanskii protsess v usloviiakh pandemii: vyzovy i novatsii [Civil
Procedure in the Pandemic: Challenges and Innovations]. In Isaenkova O.V. (ed.). Perspektivy
razvitiia grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava: sbornik po materialam IV Mezhdunarodnoi
nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi 90-letiiu SIuI-SGIuA
(g. Saratov, 3 oktiabria 2020 g.) [Prospects for the Development of Civil Procedural
Law: Collection Based on the Materials of the IV International Scientific and Practical
Conference Dedicated to the 90th Anniversary of the Saratov State Law Academy (Saratov,
3 October 2020)]. Saratov: Saratov State Law Academy Publishing House, 2020,
pp. 462–465. (In Russ.)
Vikut M.A. (ed.). Grazhdanskii protsess Rossii: uchebnik [Civil Procedure of Russia:
Textbook]. Moscow: Iurist, 2004. 459 p. (In Russ.)
Zriachkin A.N. O formakh proiavleniia pravovogo nigilizma [On the Forms of Legal
Nihilism]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii prava – Herald of the Saratov
State Academy of Law, 2006, no. 6(52). pp. 37–41. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

N.A. Artebyakina (Ulyanovsk, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Department of Law, Pedagogy and Psychology, Ulyanovsk State Agrarian
University named after P.A. Stolypin (1 New Wreath Blvd., Ulyanovsk, 432000, Russia;

Recommended citation

Artebyakina N.A. Razmyshleniia o sostoianii sovremennoi grazhdanskoi protsessual’noi
formy [Reflecting on the Condition of the Modern Civil Procedural Form]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 95–111. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-6-95-111

N.A. ARTEBYAKINA