We in a citing index:
METHODOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF DIALECTICAL CATEGORIES IN THE IDENTIFICATION AND STUDY OF PROBLEMS OF CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE LAW
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department of Civil Procedure,
Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University
The article is devoted to the study of the use of some categories of dialectics both in identifying
and in studying the problems of civil and arbitral procedure law. Each category allows
to reveal its own peculiar features and properties of the branch of law and its structural
subdivisions, not only to obtain certain conclusions, but, what is equally important, to
put into research its own problems, the answer to which the use of this or that particular
category gives. It is noted that each category allows to reveal some one side of the subject
of research, but to reveal in depth. In particular, the author argues that a comprehensive
disclosure of the essence of civil procedure law is impossible with the use of any one category.
Only by covering all or most of them it is possible to fully and comprehensively disclose the
essence of the subject of research. At the same time, each method implies the study only
of certain problems, conditioned by it. The study of some other problems, “alien” to this
method will not give the necessary results. Thus, it is impossible to solve the problems of
the system of branch of law with the help of the activity approach.
Keywords: categories of dialectics; quantity; quality; negation; whole and part; form and
content; singular; general and particular; civil procedure; arbitration procedure.
Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiia: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2015. 588 p. (In Russ.)
Bol’shaia sovetskaia entsiklopediia: v 30 t. T. 19 [The Great Soviet Encyclopedia. In
30 vols. Vol. 19]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Sovetskaia entsiklopediia, 1975. 704 p. (In Russ.)
Kerimov D.A. Otdel’noe, osobennoe i obshchee v prave [The Separate, the Particular and
the General in Law]. Pravovedenie – Jurisprudence, 1968, no. 6, pp. 7–13. (In Russ.)
Kerimov V.D. Filosofskie problemy prava [Philosophical Problems of Law]. Moscow:
Mysl, 1972. 472 p. (In Russ.)
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. T. 29 [Complete Works. Vol. 29]. Moscow:
Politizdat, 1973. 783 р. (In Russ.)
Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniia: v 30 t. T. 20 [Essays. In 30 vols. Vol. 20] 2nd ed. M.:
Gospolitizdat, 1961. 827 p. (In Russ.)
Spirkin A.S. Kurs marksistskoi filosofii [A Course in Marxist Philosophy]. 2nd ed.
Moscow: Mysl, 1966. 542 p. (In Russ.)
Ushakov A.A. Ocherki sovetskoi zakonodatel’noi stilistiki: soderzhanie i forma v prave
i problema zakonodatel’noi stilistiki: uchebnoe posobie: v 2 ch. Ch. 1 [Essays on Soviet Legislative
Stylistics: Content and Form in Law and the Problem of Legislative Stylistics: Textbook.
In 2 parts. Part 1]. Perm: Perm State University Publ., 1967. 206 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
V.M. Sherstyuk (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department
of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University (1 Leninskie
Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia; e-mail: email@example.com).
Sherstyuk V.M. Metodologicheskoe znachenie kategorii dialektiki pri vyiavlenii i issledovanii
problem grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo prava [Methodological
Significance of Dialectical Categories in the Identification and Study of Problems of
Civil and Arbitration Procedure Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 71–85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-