We in a citing index:
REASONS FOR THE REVIVAL OF ARBITRATION, INCLUDING SPORTING, OTHER FORMS OF ADR
S.V. ALEXEEV,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Faculty of Law,
National Research University Higher School of Economics,
Head of the Department of Sports Law, Chief Researcher, Institute of Legislation
and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
V.S. KAMENKOV,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Scientific Consultant,
Department of Financial Law and Legal Regulation of Economic Activity,
Director of the International Scientific and Educational Center for Mediation,
Reconciliation and Arbitration Procedures, Belarusian State University,
Deputy Chairman of the Belarusian Republican Union of Lawyers,
National Correspondent of Belarus in UNCITRAL
The reasons for the revival of arbitration, including sports and other forms of alternative
dispute resolution (ADR) are identified and considered. The authors analyze the essence
definition of judicial proceedings, the judicial process and its changes in the historical aspect
on the example of civil and arbitral proceedings. The notion of adversarial legal procedure
that has been forming for almost a century in the Soviet and post-Soviet space, not only
in legislation, but also in people’s legal consciousness is considered. The reasons for which
modern states of different legal systems “remembered” about arbitration and arbitration
courts, alternative forms of conflict resolution, the simplified and reduced (abbreviated)
forms of proceedings (writ, absentee) are systematized. New ideas are highlighted in
the sphere of mediation, in electronic forms of dispute resolution and settlement taking
into account modern features of development of social relations. In the light of modern
global expansion of spheres of social relations, where legal form of rights protection has
become possible, attention is paid to the sphere of physical culture and sports and to the
problem of consideration and solution of sports disputes. Attention is paid to specialized
arbitrations: sports, banking, investment and others. The authors express their opinion
about the modern understanding of arbitration. The article tells about the formation of
the institute of mediation in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus and gives
a comparative characteristic of mediation and other forms of dispute resolution.
Keywords: legal proceedings; state courts; arbitration; arbitration proceeding; mediation;
sports disputes.
References
Chernikova I.V. Poniatiia «arbitrazh», «treteiskii sud» i «arbitrazhnyi sud» v rossiiskom
zakonodatel’stve i voprosy, voznikaiushchie pri ikh ispol’zovanii [The Concepts of
“Arbitration”, “Arbitration Court” in Russian Law and Issues Arising in Their Use]. Rossiiskii
sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2020, no. 4, pp. 29–33. (In Russ.)
Dzhagarian A.A., Benedskaia O.A. Ne men’she, chem sud: Konstitutsionnaja priroda
treteiskogo razbiratel’stva v rossiiskoi pravovoi sisteme [No Less Than a Court: The Constitutional
Nature of Arbitration in the Russian Legal System]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe
obozrenie – Comparative Constitutional Review, 2018, no. 5, pp. 106–125. (In Russ.)
Fursov D.A. Protsessual’nyi rezhim deiatel’nosti arbitrazhnogo suda pervoi instancii
[Procedural Mode of Operation of the Arbitration Court of First Instance]. Moscow:
Infra-M, 1999. 319 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Arbitrazhnyi protsess: uchebnik [Arbitration Procedure: Textbook].
4th ed. Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2010. 880 p. (In Russ.)
Khlestova I.O. Tipovoi zakon o mezhdunarodnom torgovom arbitrazhe i rossiiskii
Zakon o mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe: obshchee i osobennoe [The Model
Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the Russian Law on International
Commercial Arbitration: Common and Specific]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal
of Russian Law, 2011, no. 6, pp. 78–88. (In Russ.)
Lunaeva T.A., Skvortsov O.Iu., Savranskii M.Iu., Sevastianov G.V. (eds.). Mezhdunarodnyi
kommercheskii arbitrazh: uchebnik [International Commercial Arbitration: Textbook].
2nd ed. St. Petersburg: Editorial office of the magazine “Arbitration Court”; Moscow:
Statut, 2018. Issue 9. 965 p. (In Russ.)
Muradian E.M. Istina kak problema sudebnogo prava [Truth as a Judicial Problem].
2nd ed. Moscow: Iurist, 2004. 312 p. (In Russ.)
Pogosian E.V. Formy razresheniia sportivnykh sporov: monografiia [Forms of Resolution
of Sports Disputes: Monograph]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2011. 160 p. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo. Kontseptual’nyi podkhod [Simplified
Proceedings. Conceptual Approach]. Zakon – Law, 2013, no. 4, pp. 93–98.
Savastianov G.V. Pravovaia priroda treteiskogo razbiratel’stva i kompetentsiia treteiskogo
suda v sfere nedvizhimosti: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Legal Nature of Arbitration
Proceedings and the Competence of the Court of Arbitration in Real Estate: Synopsis
of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2013. 30 p. (In Russ.)
Shchavelev A. Novyi Reglament Kommercheskogo Arbitrazha 2018 Nemeckogo Arbitrazhnogo
Instituta [New Commercial Arbitration Rules 2018 of the German Arbitration
Institute]. In Sbornik statei o prave Germanii. Vyp. 3 (Iiun’ 2018 g.) [Collection of
Articles on German Law. Issue 3 (June 2018)]. URL: https://www.reuschlaw.de/fileadmin/
contents/2018_Newscontent/DRJV-Sammelband_zum_deutschen_Recht_in_russischer_
Sprache___Ausgabe_N_3__Juni_2018.pdf. (In Russ.)
Smushkin A.B., Surkova T.V., Chernikova O.S. Grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnoe posobie
[Civil Procedure: Textbook]. Moscow: Omega-L, 2007. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Khrestomatiia po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Textbook of
Civil Procedure]. Moscow: Gorodets, 1996. 226 p. (In Russ.)
Viner-Usmanova I.A. Nashim sportsmenam nuzhna effektivnaia pravovaia podderzhka!
Vstupitel’naia stat’ia k knige: Sportivnoe pravo: uchebnik dlia vuzov [Our Athletes
Need Effective Legal Support! Introduction to the Book: Sports Law: Textbook for High
Schools]. 5th ed. Moscow: Iuniti-Dana; Zakon i pravo, 2016, pp. 5–8. (In Russ.)
Vishneўski A.F., Juho Ia.A. Gistoryia dzjarzhavy i prava Belarusi ў dakumentakh
i matjeryialakh [History of the State and Law of Belarus in Documents and Materials].
Minsk: Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Belarus, 1998.
311 p. (in Belarus.)
Volkov A.F. Torgovye treteiskie sudy. Istoriko-dogmaticheskoe issledovanie [Commercial
Arbitration Courts. Historical and Dogmatic Study]. St. Petersburg: Printing House
of the Editorial Office of Periodicals of the Ministry of Finance, 1913. 292 p. (In Russ.)
Zhilin A.G. Tseli grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva i ikh realizatsii v sude pervoi instantsii:
avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [The Goals of Civil Proceedings and Their Realization
in the Court of First Instance: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law
Sciences]. Moscow, 2000. 72 p. (In Russ.)
Zorkin V.D. Konstitutsionno-pravovoe razvitie Rossii [The Constitutional and Legal
Development of Russia]. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M, 2011. 720 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
S.V. Alexeev (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Faculty of
Law, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Head of the Department
of Sports Law, Chief Researcher, Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law
under the Government of the Russian Federation (34 B. Cheremushkinskaia St., Moscow,
117218, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
V.S. Kamenkov (Minsk, Belarus) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Scientific
Consultant, Department of Financial Law and Legal Regulation of Economic Activity,
Director of the International Scientific and Educational Center for Mediation, Reconciliation
and Arbitration Procedures, Belarusian State University, Deputy Chairman of the
Belarusian Republican Union of Lawyers, National Correspondent of Belarus in UNCITRAL
(4 Independence Av., Minsk, 220030, Belarus; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Alexeev S.V., Kamenkov V.S. Prichiny vozrozhdeniia arbitrazhei, v tom chisle sportivnykh,
inykh form ARS [Reasons for the Revival of Arbitration, Including Sporting, Other
Forms of ADR]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11,
no. 4, pp. 139–152. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-139-152
S.V. ALEXEEV, V.S. KAMENKOV
Advertisement
Our partners
