We in a citing index:
LYING OF A PARTY IN THE ARBITRATION COURT AS A PROCEDURAL LEGAL FACT
A.R. SULTANOV,
Head of the Legal Department, PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”,
Member of Association for Better Living and Education (ABLE)
The study puts forward the idea that the development of the principle of good faith in civil
law should seriously affect the arbitration process and should make it unprofitable to lie
in court. Among other things, we believe that it is possible to raise the question of using
the legislator’s approach without the culpable occurrence of negative consequences of false
assurances about circumstances in the conduct of entrepreneurial activity. The author also
argues that there should be no deception of the court, because any decision based on a lie
is not justice and is contrary to the rule of law. In a situation where deception does occur,
there must be a mechanism to rectify the situation and level out the consequences of the
deception. As a kind of substantiation of the above ideas, the author uses a reference to
the principle of direct examination of evidence, which is enshrined in Articles 10 and 71
of the APC RF and obligates the court to directly examine and perceive all evidence in the
case, including hearing explanations of persons involved in the case, testimony of witnesses,
expert opinions, review written evidence, examine the physical evidence. Compliance with
this principle guarantees the personal perception of the judges of the arbitration court of
all evidence, which is probably one of the most significant guarantees of justice.
Keywords: arbitration procedure; lies; legal facts; jurisprudence; bankruptcy; banks.
References
Bonner A.T. Problemy ustanovleniia istiny v grazhdanskom protsesse: monografiia
[Problems of Establishing Truth in Civil Procedure: Monograph]. St. Petersburg: LLC
University Publishing Consortium “Legal Book”, 2009. 832 p. (In Russ.)
Iakovlev V.F. Izbrannye trudy. T. 2 [Selected Works. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Statut, 2012.
976 p. (In Russ.)
Iakovlev V.F., Iukov M.K. (eds.). Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu
kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Commentary on the Arbitration Procedure Code of the
Russian Federation]. Moscow: Gorodets, 2003. 848 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Arbitrazhnyi protsess: uchebnik [Arbitration Procedure: Textbook].
2nd ed. Moscow, 2003. 832 р. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi
Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian
Federation (Itemized)]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2011. 1152 p. (In Russ.)
Kurylev S.V. Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. Krasnodar: Sovetskaia Kuban, 2010.
832 p. (In Russ.)
Lotfullin R.K. Osparivanie sdelok pri bankrotstve [Challenging Transactions in Bankruptcy].
Moscow: Statut, 2020. 328 p. (In Russ.)
Medvedev I.R. Uchenie ob ob”iasneniiakh storon v grazhdanskom protsesse [The Doctrine
on Clarifications of the Parties in Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg: LLC University
Publishing Consortium “Legal Book”, 2010. 497 s. (In Russ.)
Polumordvinov D.I. Priznanie storony v grazhdanskom protsesse [Recognition of a Party
in Civil Procedure]. Moscow: All-Union Institute of Legal Sciences, 1940. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Bor’ba za pravo obzhalovaniia sudebnogo resheniia [Struggle for the
Right to Appeal a Court Decision]. Moscow: Statut, 2014. 527 p. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Dopros svidetelei v nalogovykh sporakh i dolzhnaia pravovaia protsedura
[Witness Interviewing in Tax Disputes and Due Process]. Nalogi – Taxes, 2017,
no. 2, pp. 23–27. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Dopros svidetelei v nalogovykh sporakh: zamechaniia praktika [Interrogation
of Witnesses in Tax Disputes: Practical Observations]. Nalogoved – Tax Specialist,
2017, no. 2, pp. 56–65. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Kak povysit’ uvazhenie k sudu, ili peresmotr vozmozhen [How to
Increase Respect for the Court, or Revision Is Possible]. In Aktual’nye problemy teorii
i praktiki konstitutsionnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vyp. IV [Topical Problems of the Theory
and Practice of Constitutional Proceedings. Issue IV]. Kazan: LLC “Offset-Service”,
2019. pp. 210–217. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Lozh’ i pravovaia opredelennost’ [Lies and Legal Certainty]. Vestnik
Gumanitarnogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Humanitarian University, 2019, no. 4(27).
pp. 154–159. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O lzhi, dobrosovestnosti v material’nom prave i grazhdanskom protsesse
[On Lies, Good Faith in Material Law and Civil Procedure]. In Razvitie iuridicheskoi
nauki v novykh usloviiakh: edinstvo teorii i praktiki-2019 [Development of Legal Science
in New Conditions: The Unity of Theory and Practice-2019]. Rostov-on-Don; Taganrog:
Southern Federal University Publishing House, 2019, pp. 321–324. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O nekonstitutsionnosti tolkovaniia st. 311 APK RF, ne dopuskajushchego
peresmotra po vnov’ otkryvshimsja obstoiatel’stvam pri vyiavlenii novykh dokazatel’stv,
skrytyh ot suda drugoi storonoi [On the Unconstitutionality of the Interpretation of
Article 311 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Which Does
Not Allow Revision Due to Newly Discovered Circumstances When New Evidence Is
Revealed Hidden From the Court by the Other Party]. Vestnik Gumanitarnogo universiteta
– Bulletin of the Humanitarian University, 2019, no. 2(25). pp. 52–61. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. O vozobnovlenii proizvodstva pri vyiavlenii novykh dokazatel’stv, skrytykh
ot suda drugoi storonoi [On the Resumption of Proceedings upon Revealing New
Evidence Hidden from the Court by the Other Party]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 4, pp. 237–248. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Peresmotr reshenii suda po vnov’ otkryvshimsia obstoiatel’stvam i res
judicata [Reconsideration of Court Decisions on Newly Discovered Circumstances
and Res Judicata]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2008, no. 11,
pp. 96–104. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Posledstviia lzhi v protsesse i material’nom prave [Consequences of
Lying in Process and Material Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2019, no. 5, pp. 230–262. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Umyshlennoe iskazhenie obstoiatel’stv dela storonoi v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse: iuridicheskie posledstviia i sposoby presecheniia [Intentional Distortion of the
Circumstances of the Case by a Party in Civil Procedure: Legal Consequences and Methods
of Suppression]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 12.
pp. 135–146. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Zhazhda pravosudiia ili zhazhda spravedlivosti [Thirst for Justice or
Thirst for Justice]. Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Eurasian Law Journal, 2009, no. 11,
pp. 64–76. (In Russ.)
Sultanov A.R. Zhazhda spravedlivosti: bor’ba za sud [Thirst for Justice: The Fight for
Judgment]. Moscow: Statut, 2014. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Tarnovskii N.A. Iuridicheskie osnovaniia dostovernosti dokazatel’stv [Legal Basis for
the Reliability of Evidence]. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2011. 216 р. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
A.R. Sultanov (Nizhnekamsk, Russia) – Head of the Legal Department, PJSC
“Nizhnekamskneftekhim”, Member of Association for Better Living and Education
(ABLE) (PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”, Nizhnekamsk, 423574, Russia; e-mail: aidar_
Recommended citation
Sultanov A.R. Lozh’ storony v arbitrazhnom sude kak protsessual’nyi iuridicheskii fakt
[Lying of a Party in the Arbitration Court as a Procedural Legal Fact]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 70–86. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-70-86
A.R. SULTANOV
Advertisement
Our partners
