We in a citing index:
AUTOMATION AND DIGITALIZATION IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND EVIDENCE GENERATION: STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
N.N. MAKOLKIN,
Junior Researcher, Post-Graduate Student,
Faculty of Law, Kazan Federal University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-224-235
In this article, the author attempts to consider the processes of automation, digitalization
and digitalization in the daily life of a lawyer, and the issue of using these processes in the
formation of evidence is outlined. This procedural and procedural issue is disclosed through
the prism of substantive law and the designation of specific examples and real situations
arising in law enforcement practice and the daily activities of a lawyer. The article also
addresses specific issues in the field of compliance and risk assessment associated with
both pre-contractual activities and probabilistic assessment of the flow of an abstract legal
relationship in the plane of a legal dispute, in particular the assessment of the enforceability
of the judgment at the stage of enforcement proceedings based on information about the
wealth of the counterparty. In conclusion, the author concludes that even information from
open sources can act as a trigger to improve the quality level of preparation of the plan and
the algorithm of specific steps of a lawyer, and the further informatization of society makes
preliminary information preparation an increasingly important stage in many processes,
in particular the process of gathering evidentiary material on a particular dispute.
Keywords: evidence; digitalization; civil procedure; compliance; transformation of
procedural relations; procedural reform.
References
Al-Kaabi H., Al-Karawi N. The Concept of Remote Litigation and its Requirements.
Investigative Journal of Legal and Political Sciences, 2016, vol. 8(1), pp. 277–342.
Bonner A.T. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam i nauchno-tekhnicheskii progress
[Civil Justice and Scientific and Technological Progress]. In Gromoshina N.A. (ed.).
Tsivilisticheskii protsess sovremennoi Rossii: problemy i perspektivy: monografiia [Civil
Procedure in Modern Russia: Problems and Prospects: Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt,
2017, pp. 55–98. (In Russ.)
Branovitskii K.L. Ispol’zovanie informatsionnykh tehnologii v kontekste optimizatsii
grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [The Use of Information Technology in the Context of
Civil Litigation Optimization]. Zakon – Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 59–70. (In Russ.)
Branovitskii K.L., Rents I.G., Neznamov Al.V, Neznamov An.V, Yarkov V.V. Tsifrovye
tekhnologii i tsivilisticheskii protsess: problemy vzaimovliianiia [Digital Technology and
Civil Procedure: Problems of Mutual Influence]. European and Asian Law Review, 2018,
no. 2, pp. 56–68. (In Russ.)
Golubtsov V.G. Teoriia dokazatel’stv i tsifrovizatsiia v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[Theory of Evidence and Digitalization in Civil Proceedings]. Permskii iuridicheskii
al’manakh – Perm Legal Almanac, 2019, no. 2, pp. 379–387. (In Russ.)
Scherer M. Remote Hearings in International Arbitration: An Analytical Framework.
Journal of International Arbitration, 2020, vol. 37(4), pp. 407–488.
Valeev D.Kh., Makolkin N.N. Prognozirovanie dinamiki sudebnoi zashchity v usloviiakh
tsifrovizatsii [Forecasting the Dynamics of Judicial Protection under the Conditions
of Digitalization]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 227–243. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Nuriev A.G. Digital Rights Management in a Procedural Relationship.
Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2019, vol. 10(4), pp. 281–285.
Information about the author
N.N. Makolkin (Kazan, Russia) – Junior Researcher, Post-Graduate Student, Faculty
of Law, Kazan Federal University (18 Kremlevskaia St., Kazan, 420008, Russia;
e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Makolkin N.N. Avtomatizatsiia i digitalizatsiia v pravoprimenitel’noi praktike
i formirovanie dokazatel’stvennoi bazy: postanovka problem [Automation and Digitalization
in Law Enforcement and Evidence Generation: Statement of the Problem]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 224–
235. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-224-235
N.N. MAKOLKIN
Advertisement
Our partners
