We in a citing index:
CONCLUSION OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN GROUP PROCEEDINGS
CONCLUSION OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN GROUP PROCEEDINGS
V.O. VATAMANYUK,
PhD Student, Department of Civil and Administrative Procedure,
Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-2-127-174
Within the framework of this study the author analyzes the procedural order for concluding
a settlement agreement in group proceedings. Procedural features of concluding a settlement
agreement considering disputes involving a large group of persons are highlighted. Particular
attention is paid to the research of the legal nature of the application to join the group’s
claim. It has been established that according to the procedural legislation in force, the issue
of concluding a settlement agreement in cases aimed at protecting the rights and legitimate
interests of a group of persons is decided independently by the person conducting the case. It
has been revealed that as a result of law imperfection, the scope of a joint action agreement
invocation in group proceedings tends to be unreasonably limited. The essentiality to
expand this scope by extending it to the procedural order of concluding a settlement
agreement is reasoned. It is substantiated that the legal regulation of the procedural
order for concluding a settlement agreement in group proceedings in force needs further
improvement. The author offers their own view of the procedural model of concluding
a settlement agreement in group proceedings. In conclusion of the study, the author dwells
on problematic aspects of concluding a settlement agreement, considering issues related to
the possibility of concluding a settlement agreement by individual subgroups, individually
interested members of the group, as well as issues related to the admissibility of concluding
a settlement agreement with respect to future claims.
Keywords: settlement agreement; group action; group proceedings; joint action agreement;
protection of the rights and legitimate interests of a group of persons.
References
Abanina A.Iu. Protsessual’noe souchastie v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: avtoref.
dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural Complicity in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis
for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2011. 27 p. (In Russ.)
Abolonin G.O. Gruppovye iski v grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Class Actions in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg. 1999. 28 p. (In Russ.)
Abolonin G.O. Klassifikatsiia massovykh iskov [Classification of Mass Claims]. Arbitrazhnyi
i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2011, no. 4, pp. 11–15.
(in Russ)
Abolonin G.O. Massovye iski [Mass Claims]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2011. 416 p.
(In Russ.)
Abolonin G.O. Pravovoi rezhim gruppovogo iska v SShA [United States Class Action
Legal Regime]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 3,
pp. 169–252. (In Russ.)
Alekhina S.A., Tumanov D.A. Problemy zashchity interesov gruppy lits v arbitrazhnom
protsesse [Problems of Protecting the Interests of a Group of Persons in Arbitration
Procedure]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis,
Practice, 2010, no. 1, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.)
Alekseev S.S. Obshchie dozvoleniia i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave [General
Permissions and General Prohibitions in Soviet Law]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura,
1989. 288 p. (In Russ.)
Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. T. 3: Problemy teorii prava: Kurs lektsii [Collected
Works. In 10 vols. Vol. 3: Problems of the Theory of Law: Course of Lectures].
Moscow: Statut, 2010. 781 p. (In Russ.)
Alexander J.C. An Introduction to Class Action Procedure in the United States.
URL: https://www.sarrafgentile.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/An-Introduction-to-
Class-Actions.pdf.
Andrews N. The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration and Mediation
in England. Cham: Springer, 2012. 298 p.
Avdeenko N.I. Mekhanizm i predely reguliruiushchego vozdeistviia grazhdanskogo
protsessual’nogo prava [Mechanism and Limits of the Regulatory Impact of Civil Pro
cedural Law]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House, 1969.
73 p. (In Russ.)
Bezrukov A.M. Preiuditsial’naia sviaz’ sudebnykh aktov: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk
[Prejudicial Connection of Judicial Acts: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Yekaterinburg. 2005. 180 p. (In Russ.)
Borovskaia E.I. Zashchita kollektivnykh interesov v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve:
dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Protection of Collective Interests in Arbitration Proceedings:
Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2014. 237 p. (In Russ.)
Burobina E.V. Gruppovye iski: zarubezhnyi opyt i rossiiskie perspektivy [Class Actions:
Foreign Experience and Russian Prospects]. In Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava:
sbornik rabot vypusknikov Rossiiskoi shkoly chastnogo prava 2009 goda. Vyp. 14 [Actual
Problems of Civil Law: Collection of Works by Graduates of the Russian School of
Private Law 2009. Vyp. 14]. Moscow: Statut, 2012, pp. 417–461. (In Russ.)
Cane P., Kritzer H.M. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research.
New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. 1000 p.
Chechina N.A. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye otnosheniia [Civil Procedural Relations].
St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House, 1962. 68 p. (In Russ.)
Chechot D.M Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil
Procedure]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House, 2005. 614 p.
(In Russ.)
Chechot D.M. Sub”ektivnoe pravo i formy ego zashchity [Subjective Law and Forms
of its Protection]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publishing House,
1968. 72 p. (In Russ.)
Chernyi D.S., Khizunova A.N., Rusetskii P.K. Gruppovoi isk v Rossii: «vtoroi shans»
po Kontseptsii [Class Action in Russia: “Second Chance” on the Concept]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 1, pp. 88–112. (In Russ.)
Cortés P. The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Dispute Resolution.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 512 p.
Cramton R.C. Individualized Justice Mass Torts and Settlement Class Actions: An
Introduction. Cornell Law Review, 1995, vol. 80, no. 811, pp. 811–836.
Dobrovolskii A.A. Uchastie organov gosudarstvennogo upravleniia v sovetskom grazhdanskom
protsesse [Participation of Government Bodies in Soviet Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1958. 164 p. (In Russ.)
Dolganichev V.V. Novyi gruppovoi isk v Rossii: kratkii obzor [New Class Action Lawsuit
in Russia: An Overview]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil
Procedure, 2019, no. 11, pp. 14–19. (In Russ.)
Dolganichev V.V. Protsessual’nye osobennosti vozbuzhdeniia i podgotovki del v gruppovom
proizvodstve: sravnitel’no-pravovoi aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural
Features of Initiation and Preparation of Cases in Group Proceedings: Synopsis of
a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2015. 220 p. (In Russ.)
Dolganichev V.V. Vozbuzhdenie i podgotovka del gruppovogo proizvodstva [Initiation
and Preparation of Cases of Group Proceedings]. Moscow: Statut, 2017. 176 p. (In Russ.)
Dwyer D.M. (ed.). The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2009. 488 p.
Dzhalilov D.R. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravootnoshenie i ego sub”ekty [Civil Procedural
Legal Relationship and its Subjects]. Dushanbe: Irfon, 1962. 39 p. (In Russ.)
Eliseev N.G. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo zarubezhnykh stran [Civil Procedural
Law of Foreign Countries]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2004. 602 p. (In Russ.)
Eliseikin P.F. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye pravootnosheniia [Civil Procedural Legal
Relations]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University Publishing House, 1975. 93 p. (In Russ.)
Eremkina A.P. Preiuditsiia v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand.
iurid. nauk [Prejudice in Soviet Civil Procedure: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate
Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1970. 23 p. (In Russ.)
Falla E. Powers of the Judge in Collective Redress Proceedings. URL: https://www.
beuc.eu/publications/2012-00227-01-e.pdf.
Goncharova O.S. Souchastie v grazhdanskom protsesse Rossii i SSHA: monografiia
[Complicity in Civil Procedure of Russia and the United States: Monograph]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2014. 205 p. (In Russ.)
Gukasian R.E. Problema interesa v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave
[The Problem of Interest in Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Saratov: Volga Book Publishing
House, 1970. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Gurvich M.A. Sudebnoe reshenie. Teoreticheskie problemy [Judgment. Theoretical
Problems]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1976. 173 p. (In Russ.)
Harsági V., van Rhee C.H. Multi-Party Redress Mechanisms in Europe: Squeaking
Mice? Cambridge; Antwerp; Portland: Intersentia, 2014. 298 p.
Hay B., Rosenberg D. Sweetheart and Blackmail Settlements in Class Actions: Reality
and Remedy. Notre Dame Law Review, 2000, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1377–1408.
Hensler D.R. The Future of Mass Litigation: Global Class Actions and Third-Party
Litigation Funding. George Washington Law Review, 2011, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 306–322.
Hensler D.R. The Globalization of Class Actions: An Overview. The Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2009, vol. 622, pp. 7–29.
Higgins A., Zuckerman A. Class Actions in England? Efficacy, Autonomy and Proportionality
in Collective Redress. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_
id=2350141.
Hodges C., Voet S.M. Delivering Collective Redress: New Technologies. Oxford,
UK; Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2018. 352 p.
Iarkov L.S. Obshchaia teoriia prava [General Theory of Law]. St. Petersburg: St.
Petersburg State University Publishing House, 1976. 287 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Gruppovoi isk v proekte edinogo GPK Rossii [Class Action in the Draft
of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of Russia]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia
Rossiiskoi Federatsii – Bulletin of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation, 2015, no. 8,
pp. 100–111. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Iuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2012. 608 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V., Timofeev Iu.A., Khodykin R.M. O proekte glavy 38.1 «Rassmotrenie del
o zashchite prav i zakonnykh interesov gruppy lits» GPK [On the Draft Chapter 38.1 “Consideration
of Cases on the Protection of the Rights and Legitimate Interests of a Group
of Persons” of the Civil Procedure Code]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 8, pp. 16–19. (In Russ.)
Kalajdzic J. Class Action Dilemmas: The Ethics of the Canadian DRAM Settlement.
Legal Ethics, 2015, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 188–198.
Kallistratova R.F. Institut «osobogo uchastiia» gosudarstvennyi i obshchestvennykh organizatsii
v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Institute of
“Special Participation” of State and Public Organizations in Soviet Civil Procedure: Synopsis
of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1954. 16 p. (In Russ.)
Kalmykov Iu.Kh. Voprosy primeneniia grazhdansko-pravovykh norm [Application of
Civil Law]. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House, 1976. 268 p. (In Russ.)
Khalatov S.A. Gruppovoi isk v interesakh potrebitelei roznichnykh finansovykh pensionnykh
uslug: predlozhenie modeli [Retail Financial Retirement Consumer Class
Action: Model Proposal]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2018, no. 3, pp. 78–89. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V.M. Istoriia rimskogo prava [History of Roman Law]. Moscow: Moscow
Scientific Publishing House, 1919. 478 p. (In Russ.)
Khvostov V.M. Nekotorye voprosy primeneniia novykh polozhenii Arbitrazhnogo
protsessual’nogo kodeksa RF o gruppovom proizvodstve [Some Issues of Application of
the New Provisions of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on
Group Proceedings]. Vestnik FAS Ural’skogo okruga – Bulletin of the Federal Arbitration
Court of the Ural District, 2010, no. 1, pp. 132–143. (In Russ.)
Krans B. The Dutch Act on Collective Settlement of Mass Damages. Global Business &
Development Law Journal, 2014, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 281–301.
Kulakhmetov Sh.B. Osobennosti rassmotreniia arbitrazhnymi sudami del o zashchite
prav i zakonnykh interesov gruppy lits: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Features
of Consideration by Arbitration Courts of Cases on Protection of the Rights and Legitimate
Interests of a Group of Persons: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in
Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2011. 171 p. (In Russ.)
Lazarev S.V. Upravlenie delami v grazhdanskom protsesse za rubezhom: monografiia
[Management of Cases in Civil Proceedings Abroad: Monograph]. Moscow: NORMA,
2018. 400 p. (In Russ.)
Lazarev V.V. Primenenie sovetskogo prava [Application of Soviet Law]. Kazan: Kazan
University Publishing House, 1972. 200 p. (In Russ.)
Levichev S.V. Sub”ekty gruppovogo iska na storone isttsa [Class Members on the Side
of the Plaintiff]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure,
2011, no. 10, pp. 26–30. (In Russ.)
Lindblom P.H. Group Litigation in Scandinavia. Journal of the Academy of European
Law. 2009. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 7–35.
Maleshin D.Ia. Grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia sistema Rossii [Civil Procedural System
of Russia]. Moscow: Statut, 2011. 496 p. (In Russ.)
Maleshin D.Ia. Novelly gruppovykh iskov [Novellas of Class Actions]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo
prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2020, no. 5, pp. 94–103. (In Russ.)
Malykh E.G. Problemy preiuditsii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: dis. …
kand. iurid. nauk [Problems of Prejudice Prejudice in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings:
Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2005. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Matskevich P.N. Preiuditsiia v grazhdanskom i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve:
dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Prejudice in Civil and Administrative Proceedings: Thesis for
a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2017. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Miasnikova N.K. Vidy iskov v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Types of Claims in Civil Proceedings: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Saratov. 1999. 196 p. (In Russ.)
Mulheron R. The United Kingdom’s New Opt-Out Class Action: The Unique Perspective
of a “Third Generation” Statute. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2017, vol. 37,
no. 4, pp. 814–843.
Nagy C.I. Collective Actions in Europe: A Comparative, Economic and Transsystemic
Analysis. Cham: Springer, 2019. 132 p.
Nedbailo P.E. Primenenie sovetskikh pravovykh norm [Application of Soviet Legal
Norms]. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1960. 511 p. (In Russ.)
Novitskii I.B. Osnovy rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Basics of Roman Civil Law].
Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1956. 231 p. (In Russ.)
Osakve K. Klassovyi isk (class action) v sovremennom amerikanskom grazhdanskom
protsesse [Class Action in Contemporary American Civil Procedure]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo
prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2003, no. 3, pp. 137–147. (In Russ.)
Picker C.B., Seidman G.I. (eds.). The Dynamism of Civil Procedure – Global Trends
and Developments. Cham: Springer, 2016. 283 p.
Prikhodko I.A., Bondarenko A.V., Stoliarenko V.M. Kommentarii k izmeneniiam,
vnesennym v Arbitrazhnyi protsessual’nyi kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii Federal’nym
zakonom ot 19 iiulia 2009 g. № 205-FZ [Commentary on the Amendments Made to the
Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by Federal Law of 19 July 2009
No. 205-FZ]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2009. 344 p. (In Russ.)
Rassakhatskaia N.A. Grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia forma [Civil Procedural Form].
Saratov: Saratov State Academy of Law Publ., 1998. 87 p. (In Russ.)
Reimann M., Zimmermann R. (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law.
2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. 1242 p.
Reshetnikova I.V. Razmyshliaia o sudoproizvodstve: Izbrannoe [Thinking About Legal
Proceedings: Selected Works]. Moscow: Statut, 2019. 510 p. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V., Iarkov V.V. Grazhdanskoe pravo i grazhdanskii protsess v sovremennoi
Rossii [Civil Law and Civil Procedure in Modern Russia]. Moscow: NORMA,
1999. 312 p. (In Russ.)
Ring M.P. K voprosu o grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh otnosheniiakh [On Civil Procedural
Relations]. In Uchenye zapiski VIYuN. Vyp. 16 [Scientific Notes of the All-Union
Institute of Legal Sciences]. Moscow, 1963, pp. 46–74. (In Russ.)
Robbennolt J.K. Litigation and Settlement. In Zamir E., Teichman D. (eds.). The
Oxford Handbook of Behavioral Economics and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 2014. P. 623–642.
Rubenstein W.B. Finality in class action litigation: lessons from Habeas. New York
University Law Review. 2007. Vol. 82. No. 790. P. 792–868
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Civil Procedure Course]. 2nd ed. Moscow:
Statut, 2014. 784 p. (In Russ.)
Sanger C. (ed.). The Class Actions Law Review. 3rd ed. The Law Reviews, 2019. 236 p.
Shakarian M.S. Sub”ekty sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Subjects
of Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow: All-Union Correspondence Law Institute,
1970. 213 p. (In Russ.)
Shakarian M.S. Uchastie v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse organov gosudarstvennogo
upravleniia. Lektsiia dlya studentov [Participation of Government Bodies in Soviet
Civil Procedure. Lecture for Students]. Moscow: All-Union Correspondence Law
Institute, 1978. 36 p. (In Russ.)
Shcheglov V.N. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravootnoshenie [Civil Procedural
Legal Relationship]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1966. 168 p. (In Russ.)
Streltsova E.G. O nekotorykh slozhnostiakh prakticheskogo primeneniia gl. 28.2 APK
RF [On Some Difficulties in the Practical Application of Chapter 28.2 of the Arbitration
Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Pravo i politika – Law and Policy, 2010, no. 4,
pp. 718–733. (In Russ.)
Tsihotskii A.V. Teoreticheskie problemy effektivnosti pravosudiia po grazhdanskim
delam: avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Theoretical Problems of the Effectiveness of
Justice in Civil Cases: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Novosibirsk,
1998. 47 p. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Novye polozheniia GPK RF i APK RF o gruppovykh iskakh [New Provisions
of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure
Code of the Russian Federation on Class Actions]. In Fokina M.A. (ed.). Reforma
grazhdanskogo protsessa 2018–2020 gg.: soderzhanie i posledstviia: monografiia [Civil
Procedure Reform 2018–2020: Content and Consequences: Monograph]. Moscow:
Gorodets, 2021, рр. 161–183. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. O gruppovykh iskakh v Kontseptsii edinogo Grazhdanskogo
protsessual’nogo kodeksa RF [On Class Actions in the Concept of the Unified Civil
Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald
of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 4, pp. 63–83. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Ob obshchestvennom interese i ego sudebnoi zashchite [On the Public
Interest and its Judicial Protection]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of
Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2015, no. 12, pp. 54–70. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Obshchestvennyi interes i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo [Public Interest
and Administrative Proceedings]. Zakon – Law, 2016, no. 12, pp. 101–109. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Probely v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave [Gaps in Civil Procedural
Law]. Moscow: NORMA, 2008. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Rossiiskii natsional’nyi doklad [Russian National Report]. In Maleshin D.Ia.
Grazhdanskii protsess v mezhkul’turnom dialoge: evraziiskii kontekst: Vsemirnaia konferentsiia
Mezhdunarodnoi assotsiatsii protsessual’nogo prava, 18–21 sentiabria 2012 g., Moskva,
Rossiia: sbornik dokladov [Civil Procedure in Intercultural Dialogue: Eurasian Context:
World Conference of the International Association of Procedural Law, 18–21 September
2012: Collection of Reports]. Moscow: Statut, 2012, pp. 624–632. (In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A., Streltsova E.G. O nekotorykh kontseptual’nykh voprosakh pravosudiia
po grazhdanskim delam [On Some Conceptual Issues of Civil Justice]. Zakon – Law, 2018,
no. 1, pp. 28–45. (In Russ.)
Uzelac A., van Rhee C.H. (eds.). Transformation of Civil Justice. Cham: Springer,
2018. 420 p.
Vafin Ia. Osobennosti sudoproizvodstva po gruppovym iskam v Anglii [Peculiarities
of Class Action Proceedings in England]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2009, no. 8, pp. 25–29. (In Russ.)
van Boom W.H. Collective Settlement of Mass Claims in The Netherlands. URL:
https://repub.eur.nl/pub/16703/.
van Lith H. The Dutch Collective Settlements Act and Private International Law.
URL: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.369.7966&rep=rep1
&type=pdf.
Vialykh E.I. Protsessual’nye osobennosti rassmotreniya korporativnykh sporov v Rossiiskoi
Federatsii: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural Features of the Consideration of
Corporate Disputes in the Russian Federation: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law
Sciences]. Voronezh, 2018. 251 p. (In Russ.)
Vikut M.A. Storony – osnovnye litsa iskovogo proizvodstva [Parties Are the Main
Persons of the Claim Proceeding]. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House, 1968.
76 p. (In Russ.)
White M.J. Asbestos Litigation: Procedural Innovations and Forum-Shopping. Journal
of Legal Studies, 2006, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 365–398.
Wolfman B., Morrison A.L. Representing the Unrepresented in Class Action Seeking
Monetary Relief. New York University Law Review, 1996, vol. 71, no. 439, pp. 441–511.
Yuthayotin S. Access to Justice in Transnational B2C E-Commerce: A Multidimensional
Analysis of Consumer Protection Mechanisms. Cham: Springer, 2015. 331 p.
Zeider N.B. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye pravootnosheniia [Civil Procedural Legal
Relations]. Saratov: Saratov University Publishing House, 1965. 72 p. (In Russ.)
Zhurbin B.A. Gruppovye i proizvodnye iski v sudebno-arbitrazhnoi praktike [Class
and Derivative Claims in Litigation and Arbitration Practice]. SPS “ConsultantPlus”.
2008. (In Russ.)
Zhurbin B.A. Protsessual’nye osobennosti rassmotreniia sudami del po gruppovym
i proizvodnym iskam: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural Pec
V.O. VATAMANYUK
V.O. VATAMANYUK
Advertisement
Our partners
