We in a citing index:
LAWYER AS A SUBJECT OF PROFESSIONAL LEGAL AID IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE
LAWYER AS A SUBJECT OF PROFESSIONAL LEGAL AID
IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF UKRAINE
M.V. SHPAK,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant, Department of Civil Procedure,
Yaroslav Mudriy National Law University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-2- 111-126
The revised version of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine was a consequence of the implementation
of ideas on the unification of civil procedures. Now the Code of Administrative
Procedure of Ukraine, the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine have largely received an
identical structure with the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine. It is noteworthy that the aforementioned
legislative acts have adopted a unified approach by the legislator, which has been
enshrined in the Constitution of Ukraine, regarding the implementation of the so-called
“advocate monopoly” in providing legal assistance to the participants of a muzzle considered
by a court. “Advocate monopoly” was not perceived unambiguously in legal science. The
approaches to this phenomenon are described in the article. Particularly it is noted a change
in the positions of the subjects of the legislative initiative regarding the change of wearing
and the legislative consolidation of the “advocate monopoly” in the direction of its restriction.
Some ideas are assessed, which are set out in the draft Law of Ukraine No. 1013 “On
Amending the Constitution of Ukraine (Regarding the Abolition of the Lawyer Monopoly)”
dated 29 August 2019. Conclusions are given regarding the possible consequences if legislative
novelties come into force that are proposed in the draft Law of Ukraine No. 1013 “On
Amending the Constitution of Ukraine (Regarding the Abolition of the Lawyer Monopoly)”
dated 29 August 2019. It is alleged that the abolition of the so-called “advocate monopoly”
will positively affect the development of free law help in Ukraine. The author offers to
provide new provisions to the content of the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine, which will
address in more detail the issue of participation of representatives in civil procedure.
Keywords: professional representation; civil procedural representation; activities of a lawyer;
civil proceedings; lawyer in civil proceedings; civil procedure; legal assistance.
References
Argunov A.V. Novaia shkola dokazatel’stv v stranakh obshchego prava [The New
School of Evidence in Common Law Countries]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa –
Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 1, pp. 305–342. (In Russ.)
Barshchevskii M.Iu. Advokatskaia etika [Bar Ethics]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Profobrazovanie,
2000. 312 p. (In Russ.)
Bichkova C.S., Tiagla O.V. Sub’єkti vikonavchogo provadzhennja [Subjects of Enforcement
Proceedings]. In Konstitucіja Ukraїni: shljahi vdoskonalennja: materіali kruglogo
stolu (Kiїv, 26 chervnja 2015 r.) [Constitution of Ukraine: Ways to Improve: Roundtable
Proceedings (Kyiv, 26 June 2015)]. Kiev: National Academy of Internal Affairs Publ.,
2015, pp. 68–70. (In Ukr.)
Bіlousov Iu.V. Grupovii pozov: zarubіzhnii dosvіd ta perspektivi jogo vikoristannja
v Ukraїnі [Group Lawsuit: Foreign Experience and Prospects for its Use in Ukraine].
Unіversitets’kі naukovі zapiski – University Scientific Notes, 2012, no. 1, pp. 295–309.
(In Ukr.)
Civіl’nii proces: navch. posіb. [Civil Procedure: Scientific Manual]. Kharkov: Pravo,
2018. 362 p. (In Ukr.)
Gusarov K.V. Osoblivostі okremoї uhvali u civіl’nomu sudochinstvі [Features of a Separate
Decision in Civil Proceedings]. Porіvnjal’no-analіtichne pravo – Comparative and
Analytical Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 139–141. (In Ukr.)
Gusarov K.V. Vstupitel’nyi ocherk k knige M.M. Mikhailova «Izbrannye proizvedeniia»
[Introductory Essay to “Selected Works” by M.M. Mikhailov]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 3, pp. 116–131. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. «Uliki povedeniia» v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse (k voprosu
o dokazatel’stvennom znachenii faktov protsessual’nogo povedeniia lits, uchastvuiushchikh
v dele) [“Evidence of Behavior” in Civil and Arbitration Procedure (on the Evidentiary
Value of Facts of Procedural Behavior of Persons Participating in a Case)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 4, pp. 12–32. (In Russ.)
Komarov V.V. (ed.). Civіl’ne sudochinstvo Ukraїni: osnovnі zasadi ta іnstituti: monografіja
[Civil Proceedings of Ukraine: Basic Principles and Institutions: Monograph]. Kharkov:
Pravo, 2016. 848 p. (In Ukr.)
Komarov V.V. Vchennja pro predmet civіl’nogo procesual’nogo prava [The Doctrine of
the Subject of Civil Procedural Law]. Pravo Ukraїni – Law of Ukraine, 2017, no. 5, pp. 102–
110. (In Ukr.)
Meier D.I. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. T. 2 [Selected Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow:
Statut, 2019. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Izveshcheniia i vyzovy v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Notices and Summonses
in Enforcement Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2011, no. 1, pp. 201–215. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
M.V. Shpak (Kharkiv, Ukraine) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant, Department
of Civil Procedure, Yaroslav Mudriy National Law University (77 Pushkinskaia
St., Kharkiv, 61024, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Shpak M.V. Advokat kak sub”ekt predostavleniia professional’noi pravovoi pomoshchi
v grazhdanskom protsesse Ukrainy [Lawyer as a Subject of Professional Legal Aid in
Civil Procedure of Ukraine]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 111–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-
2021-11-2-111-126
M.V. SHPAK
Advertisement
Our partners
