We in a citing index:
CATEGORIES “CONTENT” AND “FORM” IN ARBITRATION AND CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW
CATEGORIES “CONTENT” AND “FORM”
IN ARBITRATION AND CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW
V.M. SHERSTYUK,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department of Civil Procedure,
Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-2-10-25
The article studies the interaction between the content and form of arbitration procedure
and civil procedure institutions. The arising contradictions between the content and form
of the institute can be solved in different ways – in particular, by the complete rejection
of old forms that have ceased to correspond to the new content, or by the use of old
forms significantly changed the content of the institute. Content plays a leading role in the
interaction of these categories. However, this is not always the case. A form may also be an
active beginning in constituting of the institution. This fact should be taken into account
when planning future development of the area of law. The research has shown that there
are formations in the area of law that do not correspond to the form of an institute in
terms of their content, which should compel a legislator to improve procedural legislation
by enriching the content of a structural subdivision.
Keywords: institute; content; form; interaction.
References
Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. T. 2: Spetsial’nye voprosy pravovedeniia
[Collected Works. In 10 vols. Vol. 2: Special Issues of Jurisprudence]. Moscow: Statut,
2010. 471 p. (In Russ.)
Borisova E.A. Apelliatsiia, kassatsiia, nadzor po grazhdanskim delam: uchebnoe
posobie [Appeal, Cassation, Supervision in Civil Cases: Textbook]. Moscow: NORMA;
INFRA-M, 2013. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Iakushev V.S. O poniatii pravovogo instituta [On the Concept of a Legal Institution].
Pravovedenie – Jurisprudence, 1970, no. 6, pp. 66–67. (In Russ.)
Mitskevich A.V. Sootnoshenie sistemy sovetskogo prava s sistemoi sovetskogo
zakonodatel’stva [Correlation of the System of Soviet Law with the System of Soviet
Legislation]. In Uchen. zap. VNIISZ. Vyp. 11 [Scientific Notes of All-Union Scientific
Research Institute of Soviet Legislation. Issue 11]. Moscow: All-Union Scientific
Research Institute of Soviet Legislation Publishing House, 1967, pp. 3–24. (In Russ.)
Sakhnova T.V. O kontsepte edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossii
(zametki po povodu) [On the Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of Russia
(Notes On)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 1,
pp. 9–27. (In Russ.)
Shebanov A.F. Forma sovetskogo prava [Form of Soviet Law]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia
literatura, 1968. 213 p. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Kategorii «deistvitel’nost’» i «vozmozhnost’» v grazhdanskom
protsessual’nom prave [Categories of “Validity” and “Possibility” in Civil Procedural
Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 1, pp. 10–32.
(In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Novye polozheniia Arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi
Federatsii [New Provisions of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation].
Moscow: International Center for Financial and Economic Development Publ.,
1996. 202 p. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Novye polozheniia tret’ego Arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa
Rossiiskoi Federatsii [New Provisions of the Third Arbitration Procedure Code of the
Russian Federation]. Moscow: International Center for Financial and Economic Development
Publ., 2003. 400 p. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Perekhod kolichestva v kachestvo v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom
prave [The Transition of Quantity to Quality in Civil Procedural Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 1, pp. 10–30. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Poniatie i sposoby obrazovaniia institutov i ob”edinenii institutov
v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave [The Concept and Methods of the Formation
of Institutions and Associations of Institutions in Civil Procedural Law]. Sovremennoe
pravo – Modern Law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 83–91. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [The System
of Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow: Moscow State University Publishing
House, 1989. 131 p. (In Russ.)
Ushakov A.A. Ocherki sovetskoi zakonodatel’noi stilistiki [Essays on Soviet Legislative
Stylistics]. Perm: Perm State University, 1967. 206 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
V.M. Sherstyuk (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department
of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University (1 Leninskie
Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Sherstyuk V.M. Kategorii «soderzhanie» i «forma» v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom
protsessual’nom prave [Categories “Content” and “Form” in Arbitration and Civil Procedural
Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11,
no. 2, pp. 10–25. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-2-10-25
V.M. SHERSTYUK
Advertisement
Our partners
