We in a citing index:
AUTONOMY OF FAMILY RELATIONS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE
AUTONOMY OF FAMILY RELATIONS
AND CIVIL PROCEDURE
P.A. YAKUSHEV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Vladimir Regional Court,
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Activity, Vladimir State University
named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-277-293
The article examines the ontology of the autonomy of family relations and its impact on
the independence of family law as a branch of law. It is proved that the independence of
family law as a branch of law, due by the nature of family relations and their autonomy,
determines the need to regulate family relations by an independent codified normative legal
act containing material norms of law. Thus, it is concluded that the branch autonomy does
not determine the existence of a separate system of courts for the settlement of disputes
connected with application of norms of law and an independent justice. Since all family
disputes can be considered by courts of General jurisdiction within the existing types of
legal proceedings (claim proceedings, special proceedings, writ proceedings), the creation
of specialized family courts in the Russian Federation is impractical. However, for the
proper consideration and resolution of family disputes, based on the specifics of their
subject composition, the subject of dispute, the nature of relationships, degree of procedural
activity of the court, it is necessary to supplement Civil procedural code of the Russian
Federation separate chapters containing the rules governing the procedural peculiarities
of consideration of some categories of family disputes.
Keywords: family autonomy; civil procedure; sources of family law; family relations; legal
system; object of family law; subjects of family law.
References
Bespalov Iu.F. K voprosy o predmete semeinogo prava [On the Subject-Matter of Family
Law]. Semeinoe i zhilicshnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law, 2013, no. 6, pp. 2–5. (In
Russ.)
Bratus S.N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Subject and System
of Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow: Gosiurizdat, 1964. 197 p. (In Russ.)
Diduck A. Autonomy and Vulnerability in Family Law: The Missing Link. In Wallbank J.,
Herring J. (eds.). Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. Routledge, 2014, pp. 287–314.
Herring J. Family Law. Pearson Education Limited, 2015. 912 р.
Khiliuta V.V. Predely avtonomnosti ugolovnogo prava [The Frames of Autonomy in
Criminal Law]. Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2019, no. 4(149), pp. 117–128. (In Russ.)
Korolev Iu.A. Kommentarii k Semeinomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi)
[Commentary to the Family Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. Moscow:
Iustitsinform, 2003. 415 p. (In Russ.)
Kurbatov R.A., Gurbatov R.A. (eds.). Sudebnye sistemy Evropy i Evrazii: nauchno-entsiklopedicheskoe
izdanie: v 3 t. T. 2 [European and Eurasian Judicial Systems: Scientific-
Encyclopedic Edition. In 3 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. 528 p. (In Russ.)
Kurbatov R.A., Gurbatov R.A. (eds.). Sudebnye sistemy Evropy i Evrazii: nauchno-entsiklopedicheskoe
izdanie: v 3 t. T. 3 [European and Eurasian Judicial Systems: Scientific-
Encyclopedic Edition. In 3 vols. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. 528 p. (In Russ.)
Mekhrishvili L.L., Tkacheva N.A. Sotsial’naia avtonomnost’ v konstrukte «zhiznennogo
mira» sem’i [Social Autonomy in the Construct of the “Life World” of the Family]. In
Dinamika sotsial’noi transformatsii rossiiskogo obschestva: regional’nye aspekty: materialy
V Tiumenskogo mezhdunarodnogo sotsiologicheskogo foruma [Dynamics of Social Transformation
of Russian Society: Regional Aspects: Materials of the V Tyumen International
Sociological Forum]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University, Tyumen Regional Duma, Government
of the Tyumen Region, Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian
Academy of Sciences, Tyumen Industrial University, Surgut State University, Tyumen
Regional Branch of the Academy of Social Sciences, 2017, pp. 192–195. (In Russ.)
Meyer D.I. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. T. 1 [Selected works. In 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow:
Statut, 2019. 848 p. (In Russ.)
Nechaeva A.M. Semeinoe pravo: aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Family Law: Current
Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow: Iurait-Izdat, 2007. 279 p. (In Russ.)
Raz J. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford University Press, 1986. 435 р.
Redkina A.I. Kontseptsiia avtonomnosti v prave: teoreticheskii aspect [The Concept
of Autonomy in Law: Theoretical Aspect]. Pravo i obrazovanie – Law and Education,
2016, no. 11, pp. 13–21. (In Russ.)
Tarusina N.N. Semeinoe pravo: v “orkestrovke” suverennosti i sudebnogo usmotreniia
[Family Law: In the “Orchestration” of Sovereignty and Judicial Discretion]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2014. 281 p. (In Russ.)
Temnikova N.A. Imuschestvennye otnosheniia v sem’e: doveritel’nost’ vs. dobrosovestnost’
[Property Relations in the Family: Trustworthiness vs Conscientiousness]. Semeinoe
i zhilichshnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 82–84. (In Russ.)
Trofimets I.A. Tendentsiia suverenizatsii semeinogo prava i institute braka (na primere
Rossii, Ispanii i gosudarstv Ispanoameriki) [The Trend Towards the Sovereignization
of Family Law and the Institution of Marriage (on the Example of Russia, Spain
and Latin America)]. In Primenenie polozhenii chasti pervoi GK RF pri regulirovanii
semeinykh otnoshenii: problema sootnosheniia grazhdanskogo i semeinogo zakonodatel’stva:
monografiia [Application of the Provisions of Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian
Federation in Regulating Family Relations: The Problem of Correlation Between Civil and
Family Legislation: Monograph]. Moscow: RG-Press, 2020, pp. 182–183. (In Russ.)
Vorozheikin E.M. Semeinye pravootnosheniia v SSSR [Family Relations in the USSR].
Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1972. 336 p. (In Russ.)
Yakushev P.A. Reshenie suda po sporam ob opredelenii poriadka obscheniia s rebenkom:
kak izlozhit’ rezoliutivnuiu chast’ v interesakh nesovershennoletnego (protsessual’notsennostnye
aspekty) [Court Decision on Disputes on Determining the Order of Communication
with a Child: How to State the Resolutive Part in the Interests of a Minor
(Procedural and Value Aspects)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2018, no. 5, pp. 285–294. (In Russ.)
Yakushev P.A. Spory o detiakh: traditsionnye tsennosti i sudebnaia praktika: monografiia
[Disputes About Children: Traditional Values and Judicial Practice: Monograph].
Moscow: Prospekt, 2018. 144 p. (In Russ.)
Zamyshliaev D.M. Ob istoricheskikh aspektakh spetsializatsii sudov [On the Historical
Aspects of the Specialization of Courts]. Administrator suda – Court’s Administrator,
2014, no. 3, pp. 27–33. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
P.A. Yakushev (Vladimir, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Vladimir
Regional Court, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Activity, Vladimir State
University named after A.G. and N.G. Stoletovs (22-B Razina St., Vladimir, 600015,
Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Yakushev P.A. Avtonomnost’ semeinykh otnoshenii i tsivilisticheskii protsess [Autonomy
of Family Relations and Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa –
Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 277–293. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-277-293
P.A. YAKUSHEV
Advertisement
Our partners
