Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION’S IMPROVING AND THE PROBLEM OF UNITED JUDICIAL PRACTICE’S FORMING AS THE BASIS OF INCREASING OF THE EFFICIENCY OF LAND DISPUTES’ TRIAL

PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION’S IMPROVING AND THE PROBLEM
OF UNITED JUDICIAL PRACTICE’S FORMING AS THE BASIS
OF INCREASING OF THE EFFICIENCY
OF LAND DISPUTES’ TRIAL

T.V. VOLKOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal,
Associate Professor, Department of Land and Environmental Law, Saratov State Law Academy,
Member of the Scientific and Methodological Council of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia,
Member of the Scientific Advisory Council at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry
of the Saratov Region, Honorary Expert in the Sphere of Social-Humanitarian Sciences
of Kyrgyzstan National University named after Zh. Balasagyn

https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-265-276

The article is devoted to the searching of the problems of procedural legislation’s imperfectness
which is caused the not enough efficiency of land disputes’ trial. It is mentioned that there is no
united point of view on the notion “land trial”, and they are very different. The author came
to the conclusion that the main procedural peculiarities of land disputes’ trial are formallegal
(connected with terminology and categorial apparatus; organizational (connected with
competence and jurisdiction of land trials) and evidential (covered the process of proving,
using of the some means of proving and caused the increasing necessity of applying to the
special knowledge). The examples from the judicial practice are given. On the basis of the
research the suggestions to improve procedural norms are formulated. In particular, the
author focuses on the uniqueness of the object of this type of dispute, which has increased
economic, environmental and social significance, and in order to ensure the uniformity of
judicial practice in land disputes, the study substantiates a proposal for the specialization of
judicial panels in the collegium of courts. One of the arguments is the thesis that such judicial
compositions are necessary for the correct interpretation and application of special norms of
land and environmental law, taking into account an intersectoral approach.

Keywords: land relations; land resources; mechanism of management of land resources;
land rights; legal defense of land rights; ways of legal defense of land rights; land disputes;
procedural legislation; land disputes’ trial.

References

Abushenko D.B. Ispol’zovanie tsivilisticheskogo instrumentariia primenitel’no k institutu
sudebnoi ekspertizy [The Use of Civil Law Tools in Relation to the Institution of Forensic
Examination]. Herald of the Euro-Asian Law Congress, 2019, no. 1, pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)
Afanasiev S.F., Volkova T.V. Protsessual’nye osobennosti razresheniia sudami
zemel’nykh sporov [Procedural Features of the Resolution of Land Disputes by Courts].
In Voitovich L.V., Kainov V.I. (eds.). Problemy sudoproizvodstva v sude pervoi instantsii
po grazhdanskim, arbitrazhnym i administrativnym delam: sbornik statei po materialam
Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Problems of Legal Proceedings in
the Court of First Instance in Civil, Arbitration and Administrative Cases: Collection
of Articles Based on the Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference].
St. Petersburg: Petropolis, 2019, pp. 46–52. (In Russ.)
Afanasiev S.F., Volkova T.V. Zemel’nye spory: poniatie i osobennosti rassmotreniia
v sude [Land Disputes: Concept and Features of Consideration in Court]. Pravovaia
kul’tura – Legal Culture, 2018, no. 4(35), pp. 79–86. (In Russ.)
Afanasiev S.F., Volkova T.V., Ermakov A.N., Zakhariashcheva I.Iu. Metodologiia issledovaniia
problem mehanizma zashchity jekologicheskikh prav [Methodology of Researching
the Problems of the Mechanism of Protection of Environmental Rights]. Tsivilistika:
pravo i protsess – Civilistics: Law and Process, 2018, no. 1, pp. 175–193. (In Russ.)
Berdinskikh S.V. Zashchita prokurorom publichnykh interesov v sfere ispol’zovaniia
zemel’ osobo ohraniaemykh prirodnykh territorii [Protection by the Prosecutor of Public
Interests in the Use of Lands of Specially Protected Natural Areas]. Zakonnost’– Legality.
2018, no. 2(1000), pp. 29–33. (In Russ.)
Dikusar V.M. Razreshenie zemel’nykh sporov po zakonodatel’stvu Rossiiskoi Federatsii
[Resolution of Land Disputes Under the Legislation of the Russian Federation]. Gosudarstvo
i pravo – State and Law, 1996, no. 10, pp. 44–47. (In Russ.)
Kriazhkov A.V. Rol’ prokurora v zashchite publichnykh interesov v arbitrazhnom
sude: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Role of the Prosecutor in Protecting Public Interests
in an Arbitration Court: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow,
2000. 171 p. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Golubtsov V.G. Metodologicheskie aspekty mezhotraslevykh sviazei grazhdanskogo
protsessual’nogo prava [Methodological Aspects of Interbranch Relations of
Civil Procedural Law]. Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii – Methodological
Problems of Civil Studies, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 34–44. (In Russ.)
Yarkov V.V. Rol’ suda v realizatsii protsessual’nykh norm: nekotorye teoreticheskie problemy
[The Role of the Court in the Implementation of Procedural Rules: Some Theoretical
Problems]. Zakon – Law, 2016, no. 1, pp. 51–62. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

T.V. Volkova (Saratov, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Twelfth
Arbitration Court of Appeal, Associate Professor, Department of Land and Environmental
Law, Saratov State Law Academy, Member of the Scientific and Methodological
Council of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia, Member of the Scientific
Advisory Council at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Saratov Region,
Honorary Expert in the Sphere of Social-Humanitarian Sciences of Kyrgyzstan National
University named after Zh. Balasagyn (104 Chernyshevskogo St., Saratov, 410028, Russia;

Recommended citation

Volkova T.V. Sovershenstvovanie protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva i problema formirovaniia
edinoobraznoi sudebnoi praktiki kak osnovy povysheniia effektivnosti rassmotreniia
zemel’nykh sporov [Procedural Legislation’s Improving and the Problem of United
Judicial Practice’s Forming as the Basis of Increasing of the Efficiency of Land Disputes’
Trial]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1,
pp. 265–276. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-265-276

T.V. VOLKOVA