We in a citing index:
THE INFLUENCE OF CODIFICATION OF LEGISLATION ON THE CHOICE OF FORMS OF COURT PROCEEDINGS: ADMINISTRATIVE OR CIVIL
THE INFLUENCE OF CODIFICATION OF LEGISLATION
ON THE CHOICE OF FORMS OF COURT PROCEEDINGS:
ADMINISTRATIVE OR CIVIL
M.B. VELICHKO,
Judge of the Tomsk Regional Court
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-225-236
The problem of the correct choice of forms of legal proceedings in this article will be considered
in a narrow aspect, through the influence of the codification of legislation, analysis
of the nature of such rules of law as аrt. 11 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on
the procedure for judicial protection of civil rights, art. 12 of the Civil Code of the Russian
Federation on how to protect civil rights, art. 13 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
on the invalidation of acts of subjects of public authority. The relevance of the research
topic is due to the practical tasks of correctly determining the type of legal proceedings, as
well as determining the place and role of administrative proceedings as an independent
element of legal regulation and a form of judicial activity, the need to increase its effectiveness
in achieving the goals of protecting the rights, freedoms, and legitimate interests
of citizens and organizations. The rationale for the existence of the problem in this aspect
is that many procedural scientists assign the role of the “life form of material industries”
to the procedural branches, as a result of which one of their criteria for differentiating civil
and administrative proceedings is the branch affiliation of the method of protection chosen
by the plaintiff. In the literature, there are judgments that cases considered in the order
of administrative proceedings are clearly defined by law in the Special Part of the Code of
Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation and cannot be expanded and supplemented
without introducing appropriate changes to the legislation.
Keywords: administrative proceedings; civil proceedings; legal dispute; judicial control;
goals and objectives of civil proceedings and administrative proceedings; ways to protect
rights, freedoms, legal interests.
References
Bonner A.T. Primenenie normativnykh aktov v grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref.
dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Application of Normative Acts in Civil Procedure: Synopsis of
a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1980. 416 p. (In Russ.)
Chechot D.M. Sub”ektivnoe pravo i formy ego zashchity [Subjective Law and Forms
of its Protection]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 1968.
72 p. (In Russ.)
Krasnov N.I., Ikonitskaia I.A. Protsessual’nye voprosy sovetskogo zemel’nogo prava
[Procedural Issues of Soviet Land Law]. Moscow: Nauka, 1975. 151 p. (In Russ.)
Marchenko M.N. (ed.). Obshchaia teoriia gosudarstva i prava: Akademicheskii kurs:
v 2 t. T. 2: Teoriia prava [General Theory of State and Law: Academic Course. In 2 vols.
Vol. 1: Theory of Law]. Moscow: Zertsalo, 1998. 639 p. (In Russ.)
Mikhailova E.V. Protsessual’nye formy zashchity sub”ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav,
svobod i zakonnykh interesov v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (sudebnye i nesudebnye): dis. … dokt.
iurid. nauk [Procedural Forms of Protection of Subjective Civil Rights, Freedoms and
Legitimate Interests in the Russian Federation (Judicial and Non-judicial): Thesis for
a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2013. 400 p. (In Russ.)
Morozova L.A. Teoriia gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow:
Eksmo, 2007. 464 p. (In Russ.)
Nefediev E.A. Uchenie ob iske [The Doctrine of the Claim]. Kazan: Typo-lithograph
of the Imperial University, 1895. 43 p. (In Russ.)
Nekrasov S.Iu., Usova E.S. Neprimenenie sudom akta gosudarstvennogo organa ili
organa mestnogo samoupravleniia, protivorechashchego zakonu, kak sposob zashchity
grazhdanskikh prav [Non-Application by the Court of an Act of a State Body or a Local
Self-Government Body, Contrary to the Law, as a Way to Protect Civil Rights]. Rossiiskii
sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2019, no. 10, pp. 3–8. (In Russ.)
Osokina G.L. Isk (teoriia i praktika) [Claim (Theory and Practice)]. Moscow: Gorodets,
2000. 192 p. (In Russ.)
Velichko M.B. Konkurentsiia vidov sudoproizvodstv: grazhdanskogo i administrativnogo
[Competition Between Types of Legal Proceedings: Civil and Administrative]. Probely v rossiiskom
zakonodatel’stve – Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2017, no. 6, pp. 189–194. (In Russ.)
Velichko M.B. Otdel’nye osobennosti administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva po sravneniiu
s grazhdanskim, kotorye podlezhat otrazheniiu v protsedure dokazyvaniiа, primeneniiа
pravil o preyuditsial’nosti sudebnogo akta, obuslovlivaiа ikh osobennosti [Some Features
of Administrative Proceedings Compared to Civil Which Should Be Reflected in the
Procedure of Proof, the Application of the Rules on Preiudicial Judicial Act, Causing
Their Features]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9,
no. 1, pp. 423–437. (In Russ.)
Velichko M.B. Soedinenie iskovykh trebovanii v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve
[Compilation of Claims in Administrative Proceedings]. Probely v rossiiskom
zakonodatel’stve – Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2018, no. 1, pp. 138–144. (In Russ.)
Vershinin A.P. Vybor sposoba zashchity grazhdanskikh prav [Choice of a Method for
Protecting Civil Rights]. St. Petersburg: Special Faculty of Law for Retraining of Personnel
in Legal Sciences, St. Petersburg State University, 2000. 384 p. (In Russ.)
Yarkov V.V. Iuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2012. 608 p. (In Russ.)
Zakirova O.N. Realizatsiia uchastiia prokurora pri reshenii voprosov o priznanii
nedeistvitel’nym voditel’skogo udostovereniia na upravlenie transportnymi sredstvami
i o prekrashchenii deistviia prava na upravlenie transportnymi sredstvami v ramkakh
administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Implementation of the Participation of the Prosecutor
in Resolving Issues on Invalidating a Driver’s License to Drive Vehicles and on
the Termination of the Right to Drive Vehicles Within the Framework of Administrative
Proceedings]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – Administrative Law and Procedure,
2019, no. 4, pp. 65–68. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
M.B. Velichko (Tomsk, Russia) – Judge of the Tomsk Regional Court (3-32 Karla
Marksa St., Tomsk, 634009, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Velichko M.B. Vliianie kodifikatsii zakonodatel’stva na vybor form sudoproizvodstv:
administrativnogo ili grazhdanskogo [The Influence of Codification of Legislation on
the Choice of Forms of Court Proceedings: Administrative or Civil]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 225–236. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-225-236
M.B. VELICHKO
Advertisement
Our partners
