We in a citing index:
ON SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE INSTITUTE OF EVIDENCE IN CIVIL PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
ON SYSTEMATIZATION OF THE INSTITUTE OF EVIDENCE
IN CIVIL PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
E.A. NAKHOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences,
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure Law, North-West Branch
of Russian State University of Justice
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-135-152
In the article, the author also comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to systematize
the rules of proof and evidence currently enshrined in the procedural codes. In the chapter
of the procedural codes regulating the institution of proof and evidence, it is proposed to
fix paragraphs devoted to general provisions on evidence, evidentiary activities of persons
involved in the case, and means of evidence. In the general provisions, fix the basic categories:
evidence, the subject of proof and the mechanism for determining it, general and specific rules
for the distribution of responsibilities for proof, circumstances that are not subject to proof, etc.
The evidentiary activities of the persons involved in the case should be structured according to
the stages of the process (first instance, appeal), and then according to the stages of proof. The
legal rules of evidence should be defined through general regulatory issues, the procedure for
collecting, presenting (disclosing), research and evaluation. As independent means of proof,
it is proposed to consolidate electronic evidence and establish a non-exhaustive list of means
of proof. The author comes to the conclusion that the above proposals would help to optimize
law enforcement in the first place, regardless of where they would be implemented by the
legislator either in the existing procedural codes, or in the existing Concept and subsequently
in the unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: civil procedure; administrative proceedings; proof and evidence; systematization.
References
Afanasiev S.F. K voprosu o razvitii printsipov tsivilisticheskogo protsessa v kontekste
primeneniia iskusstvennogo intellekta [On the Development of the Principles of Civil
Procedure in the Context of the Use of Artificial Intelligence]. In Zankovskii S.S. (ed.).
Fundamental’nye problemy i perspektivy grazhdanskogo i predprinimatel’skogo prava, grazhdanskogo
i arbitrazhnogo protsessa v sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh usloviiakh: materialy
Pervoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii «Abovskie chteniia»,
g. Moskva, 18 noiabria 2019 g. [Fundamental Problems and Prospects of Civil and Business
Law, Civil and Arbitration Proceedings in Modern Economic Conditions: Materi
als of the First International Scientific and Practical Conference “Abova Readings”, Moscow,
18 November 2019]. Moscow: Planeta, 2020, pp. 263–268. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N.A. Differentsiatsiia i unifikatsiia v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Differentiation and Unification in Civil Proceedings: Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2010. 409 p. (In Russ.)
Kudriavtseva E.V. Vnedrenie informatsionnykh tekhnologii v grazhdanskii protsess
i printsipy grazhdanskogo protsessa [Introduction of Information Technologies in Civil
Procedure and Principles of Civil Procedure]. Vestnik sudeiskogo soobshchestva Belgorodskoi
oblasti. Spetsial’nyi vypusk – Bulletin of the Judicial Community of the Belgorod
Region. Special Issue, 2016, no. 5, pp. 43–49. (In Russ.)
Nekroshus V. Tendentsii razvitiia grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava posle priniatiia
novogo GPK v Litovskoi Respublike [Trends in the Development of Civil Procedural
Law After the Adoption of the New Code of Civil Procedure in the Republic of Lithuania].
Studia Prawno-ekonomiczne, 2013, vol. LXXXIX, pp. 121–133. (In Russ.)
Riazanovskii V.A. Edinstvo protsessa: uchebnoe posobie [The Unity of Procedure:
Textbook]. Moscow: Gorodets, 2005. 80 p. (In Russ.)
Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy edinstva i differentsiatsii:
dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Civil Proceedings: Problems of Unity and Differentiation: Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 2012. 484 p. (In Russ.)
Yarkov V.V. Elektronnoe pravosudie i printsipy tsivilisticheskogo protsessa [Electronic Justice
and Principles of Civil Procedure]. Zakon – Law, 2011, no. 2, pp. 44–50. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
E.A. Nakhova (St. Petersburg, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Department of Civil Procedure Law, North-West Branch of Russian State
University of Justice (5 Aleksandrovsky Park, St. Petersburg, 197046, Russia; e-mail:
Recommended citation
Nakhova E.A. K voprosu o sistematizatsii instituta dokazyvaniia i dokazatel’stv v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [On Systematization of the
Institute of Evidence in Civil Procedure and Administrative Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 135–152. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-135-152
E.A. NAKHOVA
Advertisement
Our partners
