We in a citing index:
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
M.R. ZAGIDULLIN,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Ecological, Labour Law and Civil Procedure,
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-119-134
The article presents the results of the author’s dissertation research on legal responsibility in
the civil procedure. The author substantiates the conclusion of the broadest interpretation
of the civil procedure, according to which it should include: 1) judicial civil procedure: civil
procedure, arbitration procedure, administrative procedure (legal proceedings); 2) out-ofcourt
civil procedure: notary, enforcement proceedings, mediation, pre-trial conflict resolution,
arbitration. Legal liability in civil proceedings should be understood as a type of state coercion,
which consists in the subject of civil proceedings undergoing the adverse consequences provided
for by the rule of law for a procedural offense committed by them in civil proceedings. The
author also distinguishes between the concepts of responsibility in civil proceedings and civil
procedural responsibility. Civil procedural responsibility should be understood as a subspecies
of procedural responsibility, which is the obligation of the subject of civil procedure to undergo
adverse procedural consequences provided for by the norm of civil procedure law, affecting
the course of the procedure, for the procedural offense committed by him. Accordingly, it is
proposed that court fines, performance fees, and compensatory (legal) liability (payment of
court expenses, compensation for actual loss of time) should be attributed not to procedural,
but to material and legal liability implemented in civil (civil) proceedings. The general state
of implementation of civil and procedural liability measures in various branches of the civil
procedure is clearly demonstrated in the form of a comparative table.
Keywords: civil procedure; legal responsibility.
References
Galperin M.L. Otvetstvennost’ v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve: dis. ... dokt. iurid. nauk
[Responsibility in Enforcement Proceedings: Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences].
Moscow, 2019. 464 p. (In Russ.)
Galperin M.L. Otvetstvennost’ v sovremennom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: dis. ...
kand. iurid. nauk [Responsibility in Modern Civil Proceedings: Thesis for a Candidate
Degree in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 276 p. (In Russ.)
Grel Ia.V. Zloupotrebleniia storon protsessual’nymi pravaми v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Abuse by the Parties of Procedural
Rights in Civil and Arbitration Procedure: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. Novosibirsk, 2006. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. Zloupotreblenie protsessual’nymi pravami v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
dis. ... dokt. iurid. nauk [Abuse of Procedural Rights in Civil Proceedings: Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 2009. 537 p. (In Russ.)
Maican O.-H. Reform of the United Kingdom Judicial System. Juridical Tribune,
2013, vol. 3, iss. 2, рр. 37–44.
Matveev G.K. Vina kak osnovanie grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti po sovetskomu
pravu: avtoref. dis. ... dokt. iurid. nauk [Guilt as the Basis of Civil Liability Under
Soviet Law: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Kiev, 1951.
40 p. (In Russ.)
Mikhailov M.M. Izbrannye proizvedeniia [Selected Works]. Moscow: Statut, 2014.
312 p. (In Russ.)
Mikhailovskii I.V. Ocherki filosofii prava. T. 1 [Essays on the Philosophy of Law.
Vol. 1]. Tomsk: Bookstore of V.M. Posokhin Publ., 1914. 632 p. (In Russ.)
Novikov A.G. Grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’: avtoref. dis. ... kand.
iurid. nauk [Civil Procedural Responsibility: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2002. 33 p. (In Russ.)
Prokhoda V.A. Doverie rossiian natsional’noi sudebno-pravovoi sisteme (po materialam
sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia) [Russians’ Trust in the National Judicial and Legal
System (Based on Sociological Research)]. Sotsiodinamika – Sociodynamics, 2019, no. 5,
pp. 86–94. (In Russ.)
Razveikina N.A. Doverie naseleniia k sudebnoi vlasti [Public Confidence in the Judiciary].
Iuridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo universiteta – Legal Bulletin of Samara University,
2016, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 99–104. (In Russ.)
Shershenevich G.F. Obshchaia teoriia prava [General Theory of Law]. Moscow:
Brothers Bashmakovykh Publ., 1910. 805 p. (In Russ.)
Sorokin V.D. Sovetskoe zakonodatel’stvo ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti [Soviet Legislation
on Administrative Responsibility]. St. Petersburg: [s.n.], 1975. 22 p. (In Russ.)
Transforming Our Justice System, by the Lord Chancellor, the Lord Chief Justice
and the Senior President of Tribunals (September 2016). 16 p.
Vaskovskii E.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: Sub”ekty i ob”ekty protsessa, protsessual’nye
otnosheniia i deistviia [Course of Civil Procedure: Subjects and Objects of Procedure,
Procedural Relations and Actions]. Moscow: Statut, 2016. 624 p. (In Russ.)
Zagidullin M.R. Grazhdansko-pravovaia otvetstvennost’ v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve:
avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Civil Liability in Enforcement Proceedings: Synopsis
of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Kazan, 2003. 28 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
M.R. Zagidullin (Kazan, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Ecological, Labour Law and Civil Procedure, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal
University (18 Kremlevskaia St., Kazan, 420008, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Zagidullin M.R. Iuridicheskaia otvetstvennost’ v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal
Responsibility in Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 119–134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-
0781-2021-11-1-119-134
M.R. ZAGIDULLIN
Advertisement
Our partners
