We in a citing index:
THE PROBLEM OF ESTABLISHING PROCEDURAL LIMITS OF LIABILITY
THE PROBLEM OF ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURAL LIMITS OF LIABILITY
N.V. MAKAREYKO,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor,
Department of Administrative Law and Procedure, Nizhny Novgorod Academy
of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
D.A. LIPINSKY,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Magistracy Department, Togliatti State University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-107-118
The article is devoted to the consideration of the characteristics of one of the most important
means of ensuring the procedural order – procedural responsibility. The potential of this
type of legal responsibility is largely due to the quality of its normative legal consolidation.
In solving this problem, it is necessary to develop answers to a number of interrelated
questions, including the establishment of its limits. Not only the effectiveness/ineffectiveness
of the application of procedural liability measures, but also the legality of state-compulsory
influence in the course of the relevant legal processes depends on its qualitative resolution.
In the course of the practical solution of the problem of establishing the limits of procedural
responsibility, it is necessary to take into account their species classification, which will help
in choosing its optimal boundaries. The limits of procedural responsibility are determined
by the legislator through the use of appropriate criteria. They are factors external to the
procedural responsibility itself, by means of which the volume of state-compulsory influence
applied to the subjects who committed procedural offenses is determined. They must include
in their unity both legal imperatives and moral requirements. The main attention is paid
to the means that, according to the author, should be used in the legislative consolidation
of the limits of procedural responsibility. It should be borne in mind that they differ in
certain dynamics. This property allows you to react to changes in the course of dispatch
of the corresponding types of legal processes.
Keywords: state coercion; legal responsibility; procedural responsibility; procedural infraction;
limits.
References
Chuklova E.V. Poniatie, osnovaniia i vidy protsessualnoi otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskii
aspekt: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Concept, Grounds and Types of Procedural
Responsibility: Theoretical Aspect: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law
Sciences]. Krasnodar, 2009. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Gushchin V.V. Pravovaia priroda shtrafnoi protsessualnoi otvetstvennosti [The Legal
Nature of Punitive Procedural Liability]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – Administrative
Law and Procedure, 2016, no. 5, pp. 63–66. (In Russ.)
Khachaturov R.L., Lipinsky D.A. Obshchaia teoriia iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti:
monografiia [General Theory of Legal Responsibility: Monograph]. St. Petersburg: Iuridicheskii
tsentr Press, 2007. 950 p. (In Russ.)
Lipinsky D.A., Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’ [Procedural Responsibility].
Moscow: Iurlitinform, 2013. 184 p. (In Russ.)
Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A., Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’ i besotvetstvennost’,
protsessual’naia i natsional’naia besopasnost’: problemy sootnosheniia i sistemnykh
sviazei [Procedural Responsibility and Irresponsibility, Procedural and National
Security: Problems of Correlation and Systemic Connections]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 149–166. (In Russ.)
Lyud D. Pravo i sila [Law and Power]. Moscow: Iugona, 2002. 416 p. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’ v ispolnitel’nom proisvodstve [Procedural
Responsibility in Enforcement Proceedings]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal
of Russian Law, 2004, no. 4, pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)
Vorontsova I.V. Problemy privlecheniia k otvetstvennosti za nesobludenie poriadka
v zale sudebnogo zasedaniia i proiavlenie neuvazheniia k sudu [Problems of Prosecu
tion for Non-Observance of Order in the Courtroom and Manifestation of Contempt
of Court]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law, 2019, no. 11, pp. 73–76. (In Russ.)
Zagidullin M.R. Vidy iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Types
of Legal Responsibility in Civil Procedure]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Russian
Legal Journal, 2020, no. 2, pp. 168–176. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
N.V. Makareyko (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Professor, Department of Administrative Law and Procedure, Nizhny
Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia (3 Ankudinovskoe Av.,
Nizhny Novgorod, 603950, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
D.A. Lipinsky (Togliatti, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Magistracy
Department, Togliatti State University (14 Belorusskaia St., Togliatti, 445020, Russia;
e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Makareyko N.V., Lipinsky D.A. Problemy ustanovleniia predelov protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti
[The Problem of Establishing Procedural Limits of Liability]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 107–118. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-107-118
N.V. MAKAREYKO, D.A. LIPINSKY
Advertisement
Our partners
