Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ISOLATION OF NON-CLAIM CASES’ LITIGATION INTO THE SEPARATE TYPE OF LITIGATION

THEORETICAL-METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS OF ISOLATION
OF NON-CLAIM CASES’ LITIGATION INTO THE SEPARATE TYPE
OF LITIGATION

A.Yu. TENKAEV,
Head of the Oktyabrsky District Court of Saratov

https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-78-88

The article is devoted to the analysis of theoretical-methodological problems of isolation
of non-claim cases’ litigation into the separate type of litigation. Classic types of litigation
are listed, it is mentioned that the basic litigation in all meanings is claim litigation, its
main feature is the dispute about law. In contrast beginning from the Roman law there are
legal cases that have undisputable character. The main terms for the naming of such cases
are searched: special litigation, protective litigation, voluntary jurisdiction. The author
came to the conclusion that no one of them can be an universal term adequately reflecting
the essence of this type of cases. The term “non-claim cases’ litigation” is suggested as the
most suitable option. The study also notes that this approach can be taken into account by
legislative bodies when making changes to procedural legislation, including in connection
with the prospect of identifying the appropriate type in administrative proceedings. In
addition, the study presents a retrospective analysis of individual institutions of civil
procedural law, in a broad sense, and procedural thought.

Keywords: types of litigation; dispute about law; claim litigation; non-claim cases’ litigation;
special litigation; protective litigation; voluntary jurisdiction.

References

Afanasiev S.F. K voprosu o vozmozhnosti vkliucheniia v Kodeks administrativnogo
sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii okhranitel’nogo proizvodstva [On the Possibility
of Including Protection Proceedings in the Code of Administrative Proceedings of the
Russian Federation]. In Kartashov A.Iu. (ed.). Aktual’nye voprosy razvitiia administrativnogo
sudoproizvodstva: sbornik materialov nauch.-prakt. konf. [Actual Problems of
the Development of Administrative Proceedings: Collection of Materials of the Scientific
and Practical Conference]. Tver, 2016, pp. 67–73. (In Russ.)
Argunov V.V. (ed.). Dobrovol’naia (besspornaia) iurisdiktsiia v Rossii i za rubezhom
(Vostochnaia i Zapadnaia Evropa, Latinskaia Amerika, Kitai) [Voluntary (Indisputable)
Jurisdiction in Russia and Abroad (Eastern and Western Europe, Latin America, China)].
Moscow: Statut, 2014. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Avdiukov M.G. Vidy sudoproizvodstv v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual’nom
prave [Types of Legal Proceedings in Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Vestnik MGU – Bulletin
of Moscow State University, 1956, no. 2, pp. 122–125. (In Russ.)
Eliseikin P.F. Sudebnoe ustanovlenie iuridicheskikh faktov: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Judicial Establishment of Legal Facts: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 1960. 15 p. (In Russ.)
Frantsiforov A.Iu. Sushchnost’ osobogo proizvodstva: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie
aspekty: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Essence of Special Production: Theoretical and
Practical Aspects: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2009. 190 p.
(In Russ.)
Gurvich M.A. Osobye proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse [Special Production in
Civil Procedure]. Sotsialisticheskaia zakonnost’ – Socialist Legality, 1958, no. 8, pp. 25–30.
(In Russ.)
Ionova Iu.A. Okhranitel’naia funktsiia iskovogo proizvodstva kak garantiia nedopustimosti
zloupotreblenii pravom pri realizatsii norm nasledstvennogo prava [The Protective
Function of the Claim Proceeding as a Guarantee of the Inadmissibility of Abuse
of Law in the Implementation of the Norms of Inheritance Law]. In Grazhdanskoe pravo,
grazhdanskoe i administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: aktual’nye voprosy teorii i praktiki:
materialy II Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Civil Law, Civil and
Administrative Proceedings: Topical Issues of Theory and Practice: Materials of the
II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference]. 2017, pp. 76–82. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. Konkurentsiia vidov proizvodstv v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse
[Competition of Types of Proceedings in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings]. Sud’ia –
Judge, 2012, no. (20), pp. 38–44. (In Russ.)
Melnikov A.A. Voprosy osobogo proizvodstva v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse
i proekt osnov grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Issues of Special Proceedings in Soviet
Civil Procedure and the Draft Foundations of Civil Proceedings]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo
i pravo – Soviet State and Law, 1961, no. 3, pp. 90–96. (In Russ.)
Morein I.B. Osnovnye voprosy teorii osobogo proizvodstva v sovetskom grazhdanskom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Main Issues of the Theory of Special
Production in Soviet Civil Procedure: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1955. 29 p. (In Russ.)
Povolotskii L.I., Liskovets B.L., Sominskii A.S. Dela osobogo proizvodstva [Cases of
Special Production]. Moscow: Legal Publishing House of the USSR Ministry of Justice,
1948. 115 p. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Textbook of Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Brothers Bashmakovykh Publ., 1917. 429 p. (In Russ.)
Zarudnyi S.I. Okhranitel’nye zakony chastnogo grazhdanskogo prava. Opyt issledovaniia
o sisteme russkikh grazhdanskikh zakonov [Protective Laws of Private Civil Law.
Research Experience on the System of Russian Civil Laws.]. St. Petersburg: Senate Printing
House, 1859. 155 p. (In Russ.)
Zheruolis I.A. Sushchnost’ sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessa [The Essence of Soviet
Civil Procedure]. Vilnus: Mintis, 1969. 204 p. (In Russ.)
Zhilin A.G. Priznanie normativnykh aktov nedeistvitel’nymi v poriadke grazhdanskogo
sudoproizvodstva [Recognition of Normative Acts Invalid in Civil Proceedings]. Rossiiskii
iuridicheskii zhurnal – Russian Legal Journal, 1998, no. 4, pp. 40–42. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

A.Yu. Tenkaev (Saratov, Russia) – Head of the Oktyabrsky District Court of Saratov
(44 Soviet St., Saratov, 410056, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).

Recommended citation

Tenkaev A.Yu. Teoretiko-metodologicheskie problemy obosobleniia proizvodstva po
delam neiskovogo kharaktera v samostoiatel’nyi vid sudoproizvodstva [Theoretical-Methodological
Problems of Isolation of Non-Claim Cases’ Litigation into the Separate Type
of Litigation]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11,
no. 1, pp. 78–88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-1-78-88

A.Yu. TENKAEV