Herald of Civil Procedure

We in a citing index:



Doctor of Legal Sciences, Action Head of the Department
of Civil Procedural and Business Law, Faculty of Law,
Samara National Research University


In modern conditions, the abundance of various open sources of official information
(mainly on the Internet) makes legally significant information on the case available to
an indefinite circle of people. In the current reality, obtaining evidentiary information of
this kind does not seem to be excessively labor-intensive for the court. The article discusses
whether it is advisable to artificially restrict the court in obtaining this information only
for doctrinal reasons of presenting evidence by persons participating in the case, and
whether it is unacceptable for the court to collect evidence on its own initiative. The existing
restriction seemed to be relevant in conditions where the evidentiary information was of an
exclusive nature, and it was associated with certain efforts for the parties to obtain it. At
the moment, the court is able to conduct a kind of “judicial investigation”, which is aimed
at both discovering new information and verifying the information provided by the parties.
By “judicial investigation” the author does not mean any formal procedure integrated into
civil or arbitration proceedings, but rather a functional, cognitive aspect of judicial activity.
Through “judicial investigation”, the court acquires a powerful tool for establishing and
verifying the facts alleged by the parties. Considering possible arguments “for” and “against”
such an investigation, the author leans in favor of its admissibility, despite the fact that it does
not have a general character, does not turn into a purposeful search and collection by the
court of information about the parties to the process and the case on the Internet, but turns
into a targeted means of checking individual legally significant circumstances of the case.

Keywords: evidence; proof; evidence from the Internet; activity of the court in civil proceedings;
collection and presentation of evidence; distribution of the burden of proof; electronic evidence.


Greger R. Sud’ia kak internet-serfer. Vyiasnenie obstoiatel’stv dela v Internete [Judge as
an Internet Surfer. Finding Out the Circumstances of the Case on the Internet]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5, pp. 161–173. (In Russ.)
Iablochkov T.M. K ucheniiu ob osnovnykh printsipakh grazhdanskogo protsessa [To
the Doctrine of the Basic Principles of Civil Procedure]. In Sbornik statei po grazhdanskomu
i torgovomu pravu. Pamiati professora Gabrielia Feliksovicha Shershenevicha [Collection
of Articles on Civil and Commercial Law. In Memory of Professor Gabriel Feliksovich
Shershenevich]. Moscow: Statut, 2005, pp. 374–425. (In Russ.)
Kurylev S.V. Osnovy teorii dokazyvaniya v sovetskom pravosudii [Foundations of
the Theory of Proof in Soviet Justice]. Minsk: Belarusian State University Publishing
House, 1969. 204 p. (In Russ.)
Mitrofanova M.A. Elektronnye dokazatel’stva i printsip neposredstvennosti v arbitrazhnom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. …kand. iurid. nauk [Electronic Evidence and the Principle
of Immediacy in Arbitration: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law
Sciences]. Saratov, 2013. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Osipov Iu.K. O dopustimosti dokazatel’stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [On
the Admissibility of Evidence in Soviet Civil Procedure]. In Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Kratkaia
antologiia ural’skoi protsessual’noi mysli: 55 let kafedre grazhdanskogo protsessa Ural’skoi
gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii [A Brief Anthology of Ural Procedural Thought:
55 Years of the Civil Procedure Department of the Ural State Law Academy]. Yekaterinburg:
Humanitarian University Publishing House, 2004, pp. 490–494. (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko V.A. Elektronnoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii. Shtrikhi
kontseptsii [Electronic Civil Legal Proceedings in Russia. Concept Strokes]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2015. 185 p. (In Russ.)
Reshetniak V.I., Smagina E.S. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
(rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt): uchebnoe posobie [Information Technology
in Civil Proceedings (Russian and Foreign Experience): Textbook]. Moscow: Gorodets,
2017. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa: Sub”ekty i ob”ekty protsessa, protsessual’nye
otnosheniia i deistviia [Course of Civil Procedure: Subjects and Objects of Procedure,
Procedural Relations and Actions]. Moscow: Statut, 2016. 624 p. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V.; Tomsinov V.A. (ed.). Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Textbook
of Civil Procedure]. Moscow: Zertsalo, 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)
Vorozhbit S.P. Elektronnye sredstva dokazyvaniia v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. …kand. iurid. nauk [Electronic Means of Evidence in Civil and
Arbitration Procedure: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
St. Petersburg, 2011. 25 p. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

A.V. Yudin (Samara, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Action Head of the Department
of Civil Procedural and Business Law, Faculty of Law, Samara National Research
University (34 Moskovskoe Av., Samara, 443086, Russia; e-mail: udin77@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Yudin A.V. «Sudebnoe rassledovanie» v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse
[“Judicial Investigation” in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 44–59. (In Russ.) https://