Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

ON THE PROBLEMS OF EXERCISING THE AUTHORITY OF THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CLAIMANT TO RECEIVE THE AWARDED FUNDS: ALL DOUBTS ARE NOT IN FAVOR

ON THE PROBLEMS OF EXERCISING THE AUTHORITY
OF THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CLAIMANT TO RECEIVE
THE AWARDED FUNDS: ALL DOUBTS ARE NOT IN FAVOR

E.V. ZAICHENKO,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant, Department of Civil Procedure,
Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Attorney

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-294-316

The author examines the problematic aspects of the implementation by the representative
of the claimant under the enforcement document of a special power to receive funds both in
the course of enforcement in the presence of enforcement proceedings initiated in the relevant
division of bailiffs, and in the order of presenting the writ of execution directly to a Bank
or other credit organization. It is stated that there is no uniformity of judicial practice on
the issue of recognizing the right of a representative to demand the transfer of funds due
to the recoverer to the account of the recoverer’s representative in the event of the exercise
of this power during the initiated enforcement proceedings. The article substantiates the
provision on the involuntary nature of the Bank’s actions carried out in accordance with
Article 8 of the Law on Enforcement Proceedings, as well as on the unreasonableness of the
ban on transferring funds to the personal Bank account of the representative in the case
of applying with an enforcement document to the Bank for the purpose of collecting in
a simplified manner. It is concluded that there are no significant grounds for differentiating
the considered options for collecting funds in order to determine whether the representative
of the recoverer has the right to receive the money awarded to the recoverer.

Keywords: enforcement proceedings; representative of the recoverer; powers of the
representative in the course of execution of judicial acts; receipt of awarded funds by
proxy; simplified procedure for execution of judicial acts.

References

Borisov A.N. Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu ot 2 oktiabria 2007 g. № 229-FZ
«Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve» (postateinyi) [Commentary to the Federal Law of 2 October
2007 No. 229-FZ “On Enforcement Proceedings” (Itemized)] 2nd ed. Moscow:
Ripol, 2020. 716 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve
» [Commentary to the Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings”]. Moscow: Norma,
2014. 606 p. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V. (ed.). Ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo: uchebnik [Enforcement Proceedings:
Textbook]. Moscow: Iustitsiia, 2017. 354 р. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V. (ed.). Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel’nom
proizvodstve» [Commentary to the Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings”]. Moscow:
Statut, 2018. 656 p. (In Russ.)
Sevastianova Iu. Dolg na schet doveritelia [Debt to the Client’s Account]. ezh-Iurist –
ej-Lawyer, 2011, no. 46, pp. 2. (In Russ.)
Sevostianova Iu. Dolg khochet poluchit’ predstavitel’ kreditora. Kogda doverennost’ ne
pomozhet [The Creditor’s Representative Wants to Get the Debt. When a Power of Attorney
Won’t Help]. Arbitrazhnaia praktika – Arbitration practice, 2018, no. 4, pp. 20–24.
(In Russ.)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook].
7th ed. Moscow: Gorodets, 2020. 992 р. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

E.V. Zaichenko (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant, Department
of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Attorney
(1, Bldg. 13 Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).

Recommended citation

Zaichenko E.V. O problemakh realizatsii polnomochiia predstavitelia vzyskatelia
na poluchenie prisuzhdennykh denezhnykh sredstv: vse somneniia ne v pol’zu [On the
Problems of Exercising the Authority of the Representative of the Claimant to Receive
the Awarded Funds: All Doubts Are Not in Favor]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 294–316. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-294-316

E.V. ZAICHENKO