We in a citing index:
ON THE “BENEFIT” OF HIGHER LEGAL EDUCATION
ON THE “BENEFIT” OF HIGHER LEGAL EDUCATION
M.L. SKURATOVSKY,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure,
Ural State Law University, Retired Judge, Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk Region,
Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-5-47-63
The main topic of the article is the discussion of the doctrinal, legislative and applied nuances
of introducing educational qualifications in the arbitration process for representatives,
highlights the history of the issue and the results of a mini-sociological study. As the results
of the analysis of all aspects of the problem, the author gives recommendations on the
application of the norm. In particular, the author notes that now, when the beginning of
professionalization has been laid, the author does not at all call to return to what was. The
best option is, in our opinion, the introduction of a mixed system, that is, when everyone
who has the appropriate powers, formalized in a power of attorney or other legal document,
gets admission to meetings. Let them be – even as a mandatory supplement to a lawyer,
after all – the presence of a lawyer, after all, both disciplines and morally encourages: he can
immediately and competently respond to an unexpected petition of the enemy and suggest
a word and participate in a meeting of lawyers.
Keywords: representation in an arbitration court; higher legal education; attorney;
representation system; advocate monopoly.
References
Bogomolov M.V. Institut sudebnogo (protsessual’nogo) predstavitel’stva v grazhdanskom
i arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk
[Institute of Judicial (Procedural) Representation in Civil and Arbitration Procedure
of the Russian Federation: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Saratov, 2014. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Davidian G.M. Perspektivy reformy pravovoi professii v Rossii [Prospects for the
Reform of the Legal Profession in Russia]. Moscow: Iustitsinform, 2019. (In Russ.)
Gorodnova O.N., Makarushkova A.A. Problemy i perspektivy pravovogo regulirovaniia
statusa lits, sodeistvuiushchikh osushchestvleniiu pravosudiia, v grazhdanskom protsesse
[Problems and Prospects of Legal Regulation of the Status of Persons Assisting in the
Administration of Justice in Civil Procedure]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava –
Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2020, no. 1, pp. 103–115. (In Russ.)
Khalatov S.A. Predstavitel’stvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Representation
in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow: Norma, 2002. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Kontseptsiia edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa RF [The Concept of
the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow: Statut, 2015.
224 p. (In Russ.)
Kozlova E.B. Sovremennye zakonodatel’nye initsiativy v sfere professional’nogo
predstavitel’stva v grazhdanskom protsesse v svete printsipa besprepiatstvennogo dostupa
k pravosudiiu [Modern Legislative Initiatives in the Field of Professional Representation
in Civil Procedure in the Light of the Principle of Unhindered Access to Justice].
Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice,
2018, no. 8, pp. 24–30. (In Russ.)
Novak D.V. Zadacha Kontseptsii – sozdat’ stimuly dlia obedineniia uchastnikov rynka
professional’noi iuridicheskoi pomoshchi [The Task of the Concept Is to Create Incentives
for Uniting Participants in the Professional Legal Assistance Market]. Zakon – Law,
2017, no. 11, рр. 6–19. (In Russ.)
Soloviev A.A. Vysshee iuridicheskoe obrazovanie kak obiazatel’noe kvalifikatsionnoe
trebovanie k sudebnym predstaviteliam [Higher Legal Education as a Mandatory Qual
ification Requirement for Legal Representatives]. Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo
okruga – Herald of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, 2015, no. 3,
pp. 141–147. (In Russ.)
Streltsova E.G., Tumanov D.A., Moiseev S.V. Kollektivnoe pravovoe zakliuchenie na
zakonoproekt Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postanovlenie Plenuma Verkhovnogo
Suda RF ot 3 oktiabria 2017 g. № 30) [Collective Legal Opinion on the Draft Law of the
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court
of the Russian Federation of 3 October 2017 No. 30)]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika
– Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2018, no. 2, pp. 56–63. (In Russ.)
Zhuikov V.M. Tak nazyvaemaia «optimizatsiia» – eto put’ v nikuda [The So-Called
“Optimization” Is a Road to Nowhere]. Zakon – Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 6–18. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
M.L. Skuratovsky (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Department of Civil Procedure, Ural State Law University, Retired Judge,
Arbitration Court of the Sverdlovsk Region, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
(21 Komsomolskaia St., Yekaterinburg, 620137, Russia; e-mail: skuratovskiimihail@
gmail.com).
Recommended citation
Skuratovsky M.L. O «pol’ze» vysshego iuridicheskogo obrazovaniia [On the “Benefit”
of Higher Legal Education]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 47–63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-
2020-10-5-47-63
M.L. SKURATOVSKY
Advertisement
Our partners
