We in a citing index:
VIDEO CONFERENCING AND WEB CONFERENCING IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
VIDEO CONFERENCING AND WEB CONFERENCING
IN CIVIL PROCEDURE
A.Kh. KHISAMOV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court
of the Republic of Tatarstan, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure Law,
Kazan Branch of Russian State University of Justice
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-254-269
The article examines modern trends in the use of video conferencing systems and web
conferences in the process of considering civil cases by courts of general jurisdiction and
arbitration courts in the context of issues of identifying the participants and ensuring the
protection of their personal data. A conclusion is made about the impact of digitalization
on the overall dynamics of improving the level of judicial protection in the digital economy,
and trends in the use of video conferencing systems and web conferences in the process
of administering justice are predicted. In the process of analyzing video conferencing
technologies, it was established that there is no unified legal regulation of the use of
video conferencing technologies with the participation of a court of general jurisdiction
and an arbitration court. In addition, the need to unify the process of establishing
the identity of a person participating in a case using video conferencing technology,
which is currently differentially regulated within the framework of civil procedure and
administrative procedure, is substantiated. Based on the results of the analysis of the
identification procedures for the participants in the process participating in the case using
video conferencing technologies and web conferences, it is substantiated that when the
Pravosudie-Online super service is introduced, user identification can be made on the basis
of a personal account in the Unified identification and authentication system, confirmed
in the prescribed manner, which does not conflict with the current legal regulation.
Keywords: video conferencing; web conferencing; biometric identification of the participants
in the process; components of the electronic justice system; remote participation in court
proceedings; unified procedure for confirming the identity of a person participating in a case.
References
Borisova E.A. Novaia kassatsiia po grazhdanskim delam: voprosy teorii, istorii, praktiki
[New Cassation on Civil Cases: Issues of Theory, History, Practice]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 21–41. (In Russ.)
Bravo-Hurtado P.; Zakirov R.F. (trans.). Avtomatizatsiia otpravleniia pravosudiia:
obrashchenie k trem oshibochnym suzhdeniiam ob iskusstvennom intellekte [Automatization
of Administration of Justice: Towards Three Incorrect Ideas on Artificial Intellect].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 1, pp. 180–
199. (In Russ.)
Chernykh I.I. Ispol’zovanie videokonferentssviazi v arbitrazhnom protsesse [The Use
of Video Conferencing in Arbitration Procedure]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika –
Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2013, no. 10, pp. 32–36. (In Russ.)
Popkova A.R. Pravovoi rezhim ispol’zovaniia biometricheskikh personal’nykh dannykh
pri udalennoi identifikatsii fizicheskikh lits bankami [Legal Regime for the Use of
Biometric Personal Data for Remote Identification of Individuals by Banks]. Molodoi
uchenyi – Young Scientist. 2020, no. 1(291), pp. 183–185. (In Russ.)
Reshetniak V.I. Primenenie videokonferentssviazi v arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve
[Application of Video Conferencing in Arbitration Proceedings]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii
zhurnal – Russian Legal Journal, 2013, no. 1, pp. 154–159. (In Russ.)
Trunk A. Elektronnye formy vedeniia grazhdanskogo protsessa. Sravnitel’nyi ocherk
po germanskomu i rossiiskomu pravu [Electronic Forms of Civil Proceedings. Comparative
Essay on German and Russian Law]. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo
protsessa – Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Procedure, 2012, no. 3,
pp. 241–259. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
A.Kh. Khisamov (Kazan, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the
Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan, Associate Professor, Department of Civil
Procedure Law, Kazan Branch of Russian State University of Justice (72/2 Pushkin St.,
Kazan, 420015, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Khisamov A.Kh. Tekhnologii videokonferents-sviazi i veb-konferentsii v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse [Video Conferencing and Web Conferencing in Civil Procedure].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 254–
269. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-254-269
A.Kh. KHISAMOV
Advertisement
Our partners
