We in a citing index:
ON THE PROCEDURAL IMPORTANCE OF INTRODUCTION DIGITAL RIGHTS INTO CIVIL LAW
ON THE PROCEDURAL IMPORTANCE
OF INTRODUCTION DIGITAL RIGHTS INTO CIVIL LAW
R.I. KHASANSHIN,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department of Environmental,
Labor Law and Civil Procedure, Faculty of Law, Kazan Federal University, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil and Business Law, Kazan Innovative University
named after V.G. Timiryasov
M.A. VEKSHIN,
Student, Faculty of Law, Kazan Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov
A.V. BILALOV,
Master Student, Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure,
Faculty of Law, Kazan Federal University
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-198-210
In paper are discussed problems of introduction digital rights into Russian civil law in the
view of procedural discipline. The Authors marked that conditions in that Russian Federation
allows defending boned with digital rights circulation relations aren’t enough in key virtues
restriction: anonymity, fast circulation, low costs for disposes regarding that kind of civil rights
objects. Russian law science in that particular moment didn’t adopted strict concept to define
the essence of the new civil rights objects so legal circulation will be below in comparison
to underground market in addition to uncomfortable financial activities according digital
rights. The Authors analyzed materials of practice of arbitrage and ordinary courts related
to significant part of case law in the field of digital law; opinions top public officials and
other public authority, which related in positions in particular cases in many ways. Also,
generally that agencies have taken positions that digital rights insufficiently defined, so it can’t
contribute to stability of business and satisfy the printsiple requirements of law.
Keywords: civil procedure; civil law; civil rights objects; cruptocurrency; digital assets;
Bitcoin; token.
References
Gaiduk V.P. Evoliutsiia prava intellektual’noi sobstvennosti v tsifrovuiu epokhu [Evolution
of Intellectual Property Law in the Digital Age]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal
of Russian Law, 2020, no. 2, pp.72–85. (In Russ.)
Iakimenko D.V. Obzor proekta FZ «O tsifrovykh finansovykh aktivakh» [Review of
the Draft Federal Law “On the Digital Financial Assets”]. Baltiiskii gumanitarnyi zhurnal
– Baltic Humanities Journal, 2019, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 194–196. (In Russ.)
Konobeevskaia I.M. Tsifrovye prava kak novyi ob’ekt grazhdanskogo prava [Digital
Rights as a New Object of Civil Law]. Izvestiia Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaia seriia.
Seriia «Ekonomika. Upravleniye. Pravo» – News of Saratov University. New Series. Series
“Economics. Control. Law”, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 330–334. (In Russ.)
Laptev V.A. Tsifrovye ob’ekty kak ob’ekty grazhdanskikh prav [Digital Objects as
Objects of Civil Rights]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi akademii MVD Rossii – Journal of
Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2018, no. 2(42),
pp. 199–204. (In Russ.)
Lunts L.A. Den’gi i denezhnye obiazatel’stva v grazhdanskom prave [Money and Monetary
Obligations in Civil Law]. Moscow: Statut, 2004. 350 p. (In Russ.)
Poliakova V.V., Tokun L.V. Stanovlenie rynka tsifrovykh finansovykh aktivov v Rossiiskoi
Federatsii [Formation of the Digital Financial Assets Market in the Russian Federation].
Vestnik universiteta – Herald of the University, 2019, no. 6, pp. 150–153. (In Russ.)
Savigny F.C. von. Obiazatel’stvennoe pravo [Law of Obligations]. St. Petersburg:
Iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004. 576 p. (In Russ.)
Sitdikova R.I., Sitdikov R.I. Tsifrovye prava kak novyi vid imushchestvennykh prav
[Digital Rights as a New Type of Property Rights]. Voprosy imushchestvennoi politiki –
Issues of Property Policy, 2018, no. 9, pp. 56–61. (In Russ.)
Sukhanov E.A. Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik: v 4 t. T. 1 [Civil Law: Textbook. In
4 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Statut, 2019. 576 p. (In Russ.)
Vasilevskaia L.Iu. Token kak novyi ob’ekt grazhdanskikh prav: problemy iuridicheskoi
kvalifikatsii tsifrovogo prava [Token as a New Subject of Civil Rights: Problems of the
Legal Qualification of Digital Law]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava – Actual Problems
of Russian Law, 2019, no. 5, pp.111–119. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
R.I. Khasanshin (Kazan, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer,
Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure, Faculty of Law, Kazan
Federal University, Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Business Law, Kazan
Innovative University named after V.G. Timiryasov (18 Kremlevskaia St., Kazan, 420008,
Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
M.A. Vekshin (Kazan, Russia) – Student, Faculty of Law, Kazan Innovative University
named after V.G. Timiryasov (71, Bldg. 6 Mazit Gafuri St., Kazan, 420108, Russia;
e-mail: [email protected]).
A.V. Bilalov (Kazan, Russia) – Master Student, Department of Environmental,
Labor Law and Civil Procedure, Faculty of Law, Kazan Federal University (18 Kremlevskaia
St., Kazan, 420008, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Khasanshin R.I., Vekshin M.A., Bilalov A.V. K voprosu o protsessual’noi znachimosti
vvedeniia tsifrovykh prav v grazhdanskoe zakonodatel’stvo [On the Procedural Importance
of Introduction Digital Rights into Civil Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 198–210. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-198-210
R.I. KHASANSHIN, M.A. VEKSHIN, A.V. BILALOV
Advertisement
Our partners
