We in a citing index:
FAMILY MEDIATION AS A PRE-TRIAL ORDER OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BY OPERATION OF LAW
FAMILY MEDIATION AS A PRE-TRIAL ORDER
OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT BY OPERATION OF LAW
O.V. PODKORYTOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University, Mediator,
Member of the Republican Community of Mediators of the Kyrgyz Republic
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-180-197
The possibilities of family mediation are large enough to consider it as a pre-trial order of
dispute settlement. The consensual nature of the mediation procedure, specially designed
mediation models for family disputes and the interpersonal nature of family conflict can
become a new approach in the system of legal regulation of pre-trial order of dispute
resolution. The missing elements of blanket legal norm of pre-trial order are made up for
through other norms, which, as a rule, are located in the substantive sectoral legislation.
The existing legal norms, establishing settlement of family disputes before going to court
by concluding an agreement between equal subjects, give rise to consider them norms
detailing the rule on pre-trial dispute resolution established by procedural legislation.
In this case, it can be assumed that there are prerequisites for establishing by the law the
pre-trial family mediation for this reason. The law may provide for types of family disputes
that are necessarily resolved with the involvement of a mediator. The choice of the dispute
should be determined by the consensual nature of the relationships from which they arise.
The mandatory of pre-trial family mediation is associated with the implementation of the
principle of voluntary procedure, the limitation of which is compensated by the ability to
resolve the dispute in an appropriate way.
Keywords: pre-trial order; family dispute; negotiation; mandatory mediation; voluntariness;
dispute mediability; peremptory norm; discretionary norm.
References
Bannikov R.Iu. Dosudebnyi poryadok v sisteme predposylok i uslovii realizatsii prava
na pred’iavlenie iska v sud: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Pretrial Procedure in
the System of Prerequisites and Conditions for the Exercise Realization of the Right
to Sue: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Voronezh, 2010.
27 p. (In Russ.)
Borisova E.A. Rossiiskaia protsedura mediatsii: kontseptsiia razvitiia [Russian Mediation
Procedure: Development Concept]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of
Civil Procedure, 2011, no. 1, pp. 66–78. (In Russ.)
Demin A.V., Kiparisov F.G. Blanketnyi i otsylochnyi sposoby formirovaniia pravovykh
norm: poniatie, sistematizatsiia, problematika [Blanket and Referential Methods of Formation
of Legal Norms: Concept, Systematizing, Problems]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskoi
akademii MVD Rossii – Journal of Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal
Affairs of Russia, 2015, no. 2(30), pp. 25–32. (In Russ.)
Dudina A.N. Poniatie i priznaki imperativnykh norm prava (teoretiko-pravovoi analiz)
[Concept and Characteristic Features of Imperative Legal Standards (Theoretical and
Legal Analysis)]. Izvestiia Irkutskoi gosudarstvennoi ekonomicheskoi akademii – Izvestiya
of Irkutsk State Economics Academy, 2015, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 22–33. (In Russ.)
Kniazev D.V. Deistviia storon grazhdanskogo spora v sluchae deistviia obiazatel’noi
mediatsii: analiz opyta SShA [Actions of the Parties to a Civil Dispute in Case of Mandatory
Mediation: Analysis of the U.S. Experience]. Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2018,
no. 10(143), pp. 130–145. (In Russ.)
Kozhevnikov V.V. Dispozitivnye normy sovremennogo rossiiskogo prava: poniatie,
osobennosti, problemy [Discretionary Rules of Modern Russian Law: Concept, Features,
Problems]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law, 2016, no. 2, pp. 6–18. (In Russ.)
Kurochkin S.A. Chastnye i publichnye nachala v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Private
and Public Law Foundations in Civil Procedure]. Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2012.
560 p. (In Russ.)
Nikonov B.P. Spor o rebenke. Zakon i sudebnaia praktika po voprosu ob otobranii
roditeliami svoikh detei ot postoronnikh lits [Child Dispute. Law and Trial Practice on
the Selection by Parents of Their Children from Unauthorized Persons]. St. Petersburg,
1911. 72 p. (In Russ.)
Nosyreva E.I. Stanovlenie instituta mediatsii v Rossii [The Mediation Institute in Russia].
In Nosyreva E.I., Filchenko D.G. (eds.). Razvitie mediatsii v Rossii: teoriia, praktika,
obrazovanie: sbornik statei [Development of Mediation in Russia: Theory, Practice,
Education: Collection of Articles]. Moscow; Berlin: Infotropic Media, 2012, pp. 1–13.
(In Russ.)
Shamlikashvili Ts.A. (comp.). Sud. ARS. Mediatsiia: sbornik statei [Court. Alternative
Dispute Resolution. Mediation: Collection of Articles]. Moscow, 2017. 140 p. (In Russ.)
Sherstneva N.S. Printsipy rossiiskogo semeinogo prava: avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid.
nauk [Principles of Russian Family Law: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in
Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2007. 60 p. (In Russ.)
Torchilin K.E. Vidy imperativnykh norm prava [Types of Mandatory Norms of Law].
Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii – Herald of Saratov State
Legal Academy, 2017, no. 6(119), pp. 57–69. (In Russ.)
Trossen А. Familienmediation. URL: https://www.wiki-to-yes.org/Familienmediation.
Tuzhilova-Ordanskaia E.M. Sootnoshenie publichno-pravovykh i chastnopravovykh
nachal v regulirovanii imperativnykh i dispozitivnykh norm grazhdanskogo prava [The
Correlation of Public Law and Private Law Foundations in the Regulation of Peremptory
and Discretionary Rules of Civil Law]. In Kharitonova Yu.S. (ed.). Sbornik statei
uchastnikov IV Ezhegodnoi mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posvyashch.
pamiati zasluzh. iurista RF, d.iu.n., professora Korshunova N.M. [Collection
of Articles of Participants of the IV Annual International Scientific-Practical Conference,
Dedicated to the Memory of Deserved Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Doctor
of Law, Professor N.M. Korshunov]. Moscow: Moscow Academy of Economics and
Law, 2015, pp. 155–162. (In Russ.)
Velichkova O.I. Sovershenstvovanie semeinogo zakonodatel’stva po voprosam mediatsii
[Improvement of Family Law on Mediation]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava
– Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2017, no. 5(78), pp. 50–54. (In Russ.)
Zaitsev A.I. Obiazatel’naia mediatsiia: argumenty «za» i «protiv» [Mandatory Mediation:
Arguments “for” and “Against”]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2012, no. 6, pp. 57–65. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
O.V. Podkorytova (Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic) – Candidate of Legal Sciences,
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic
University, Mediator, Member of the Republican Community of Mediators of the Kyrgyz
Republic (42 Chui Av., Bishkek, 720065, Kyrgyz Republic; e-mail: o_podkorytova@
mail.ru).
Recommended citation
Podkorytova O.V. Semeinaia mediatsiia kak dosudebnyi poriadok uregulirovaniia
sporov v silu zakona [Family Mediation as a Pre-Trial Order of Dispute Settlement by
Operation of Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020,
vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 180–197. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-
180-197
O.V. PODKORYTOVA
Advertisement
Our partners
