We in a citing index:
EFFICIENT COURT JUDGMENT
EFFICIENT COURT JUDGMENT
S.A. KUROCHKIN,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Vice-Rector for International Relations,
Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. Yeltsin, Associate Professor,
Department of Theory of State and Law, Ural State Law University
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-64-88
The court judgment plays an important role in the mechanism of judicial protection of the
rights and legitimate interests of citizens, organizations and the state. Being the result of
judicial proceedings, it governs the further development of public relations. Not any, but
only an effective court judgment ensures the real achievement of both private and public
goals of civil litigation with minimal costs. The paper proposes the concept of an effective
judgment, defined by its properties as an act of justice, an imperious command, a law
enforcement act that acquires the force of Law, the most rational alternative among the
possible means of achieving the goals of civil procedure. Using the advanced methods of
law and economics and sociology analysis, the main aspects of judicial acts issued by court
because of civil case resolution are analyzed. Doctrinal issues of the judgment’s efficiency
in all its manifestations have become the basis for practical-oriented conclusions, which
implementation will increase the effectiveness and efficiency of civil justice system. The
author also notes that when the legal goal has been achieved by the court, legality has
been ensured, but an undesirable social effect has occurred, which was caused by law
enforcement activities, it is necessary to pay attention to the complex inefficiency of the
proceedings, and not to the negative effectiveness of the judicial act.
Keywords: efficiency; judgment; civil justice; law enforcement; legal proceedings; law
enforcement act.
References
Alekseev S.S. Mekhanizm pravovogo regulirovaniia v sotsialisticheskom gosudarstve
[Mechanism of Legal Regulation in the Socialist State]. 2nd ed. Yekaterinburg: Avtograf,
2018. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Berg L.N. Sudebnoe usmotrenie i ego predely (obshcheteoreticheskii aspekt): dis. …
kand. iurid. nauk [Judicial Discretion and its Limits (General Theoretical Aspect): Thesis
for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2008. 202p. (In Russ.)
Bonner A.T. Elektronnoe pravosudie: real’nost’ ili novomodnyi termin [Electronic Justice:
Reality or a Newfangled Term]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2018, no. 1, pp. 22–38. (In Russ.)
Bonner A.T. Primenenie normativnykh aktov v grazhdanskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. …
dokt. iurid. nauk [Application of Normative Acts in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. In Bonner A.T. Izbrannye trudy. In 7 vols. T. 2:
Istochniki grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Selected Works. In 7 vols. Vol. 2: Sources
of Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2017. 352 p. (In Russ.)
Cadiet L., Normand J., Amrani Mekki S. Théorie générale du procès. Paris: P.U.F.,
2010. 950 p.
Carbonnier J.; Tumanov V.A. (trans.). Iuridicheskaia sotsiologiia [Legal Sociology].
Moscow: Progress, 1986. 351 p. (In Russ.)
Chechina N.A. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on
Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University,
2004. 656 р. (In Russ.)
Cooter R., Ulen T. Pravo i ekonomika [Law and Economics]. Moscow: Delo, 2018.
800 p. (In Russ.)
Dobrovolskii A.A. Nekotorye voprosy iskovoi formy zashchity prava: dis. … dokt. iurid.
nauk [Some Issues of the Claim Form of Protection of the Right: Thesis for a Doctor
Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1965. (In Russ.)
Glazyrin V.V., Nikitinskii V.I. Effektivnost’ pravoprimenitel’nykh aktov [Effectiveness
of Law Enforcement Acts]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law, 1984,
no. 2, pp. 22–31. (In Russ.)
Goikhbarg A.G. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure]. Moscow:
Gosizdat, 1928. 320 p. (In Russ.)
Karapetov A.G. Ekonomicheskii analiz prava [Economic Analysis of Law]. Moscow:
Statut, 2016. 528 p. (In Russ.)
Lazarev V.V. Effektivnost’ pravoprimenitel’nykh aktov. Voprosy teorii [Effectiveness
of Law Enforcement Acts. Issues of Theory]. Kazan: Publishing House of Kazan University,
1975. 207 p. (In Russ.)
Lazarev V.V. Pravoprimenitel’nye akty i ikh effektivnost’ v usloviiakh razvitogo sotsialisticheskogo
obshchestva (teoreticheskoe issledovanie): dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Law
Enforcement Acts and Their Effectiveness in the Conditions of a Developed Socialist
Society (Theoretical Research): Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Kazan,
1977. (In Russ.)
Maleshin D.Ya. Grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia sistema Rossii [Civil Procedural System
of Russia]. Moscow: Statut, 2011. 496 p. (In Russ.)
Momotov V.V. Sudebnaia reforma 2018 goda v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: kontseptsiia,
tseli, soderzhanie [Judicial Reform of 2018 in the Russian Federation: Concept, Goals,
Content]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 10, pp. 134–
146. (In Russ.)
Posner R. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008. 400 p.
Rents I.G. Fakty i dokazatel’stva v mezhdunarodnykh sporakh: mezhdu istinoi
i spravedlivost’iu [Facts and Evidence in International Disputes: Between Truth and
Justice]. Moscow: Statut, 2018. 304 p. (In Russ.)
Tsikhotskii A.V. Teoreticheskie problemy effektivnosti pravosudiia po grazhdanskim
delam [Theoretical Problems of Efficiency of Justice in Civil Cases]. Novosibirsk: Nauka,
1997. 392 p. (In Russ.)
Zagainova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoi vlasti v grazhdanskom
i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Implementation of
Judicial Power in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2007.
400 p. (In Russ.)
Zeider N.B. Sudebnoe reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu [Civil Judgment]. Moscow:
Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1966. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
S.A. Kurochkin (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Vice-Rector
for International Relations, Ural Federal University named after the first President
of Russia B. Yeltsin, Associate Professor, Department of Theory of State and Law, Ural
State Law University (19 Mira St., Yekaterinburg, 620000, Russia; e-mail: kurochkin@
e1.ru).
Recommended citation
Kurochkin S.A. Effektivnoe sudebnoe reshenie [Efficient Court Judgment]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 64–88. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-64–88
S.A. KUROCHKIN
Advertisement
Our partners
