We in a citing index:
CAUSE AND CONSEQUENCES CATEGORIES IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURAL AND CIVIL PROCEDURE LAW
CAUSE AND CONSEQUENCES CATEGORIES
IN ARBITRATION PROCEDURAL AND CIVIL
PROCEDURE LAW
V.M. SHERSTYUK,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Department of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty,
Lomonosov Moscow State University
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-2- 9-31
In this article, the author explores the effect of cause and effect categories in civil procedural
and arbitration procedural law. The author concluded that the action of these categories
has its own characteristics and specifics, due to the subject of the legislator. The cause
category in lawmaking is associated with not only the generation or change in the properties
of an object, as it is considered in philosophy, but also with the cancellation (“death”) of
normative acts. The study shows that in one federal law adopted in the manner prescribed
by law, two normative acts may be contained; the provisions of one of them are the reason
for the adoption of the other provisions contained in the second normative act, which is
a consequence of the first. Cause and effect here arise simultaneously with the adoption
of federal law, and not one by one, as is customary in philosophy. Thus, the allocation
of internal and external causes, according to the author, deserves close attention and
detailed study and consideration, due to the fact that they, in the first place, ensure the
interconnection of substantive and procedural law.
Keywords: reason; effect; law; communication; regulatory act; Civil Procedure Code of the
Russian Federation; Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
References
Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiia: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2015. 592 p. (In Russ.)
Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. T. 2: Spetsial’nye voprosy pravovedeniia [Collected
Works. In 10 vols. Vol. 2: Special Issues of Law]. Moscow: Statut, 2010. 471 p.
(In Russ.)
Balashov L.E. Filosofiia: uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Publishing
and Trading Corporation “Dashkov and Co.”, 2009. 664 p. (In Russ.)
Borovikov S.A. Vliianie norm material’nogo prava na normy arbitrazhnogo
protsessual’nogo prava: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Effect of Substantive Law
on the Rules of Arbitration Procedural Law: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree
in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2005. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Engels F. Dialektika prirody [Dialectic of Nature]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1969. 356 p.
(In Russ.)
Gontsov N.I., Reutov V.P. O iuridicheskoi prirode i vidakh predpisanii, soderzhashchikhsia
v postanovleniiakh Plenuma Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the
Legal Nature and Types of Requirements Contained in the Decisions of the Plenum of
the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie
nauki – Herald of Perm University. Jurisprudence, 2014, iss. 3(25), pp. 10–22.
(In Russ.)
Kuznetsov E.V. Kategorii prichiny i sledstviia v sovetskom pravotvorchestve: avtoref.
dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Categories of Cause and Effect in Soviet Lawmaking: Synopsis
of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 1970. (In Russ.)
Kuznetsova N.F., Tiazhkova I.M. (eds.). Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaia chast’.
T. 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii [Criminal Law Course. General Part. Vol. 1: Doctrine of
Crime]. Moscow: Zertsalo-M, 2002. 624 p. (In Russ.)
Magomedova M.A. Teoriia i praktika vzaimodeistviia arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo
i material’nykh otraslei prava: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Theory and Practice of
Interaction of the Arbitration Procedural and Substantive Branches of Law: Synopsis of
a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2002. 28 p. (In Russ.)
Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniia: v 30 t. T. 20 [Collected Works. In 30 vols. Vol. 20].
2nd ed. Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1961. 827 p. (In Russ.)
Minasian A.M. Dialektika kak logika: uchebnik po filosofii [Dialectics as Logic: Textbook
on Philosophy]. URL: http://libarch.nmu.org.ua/bitstream/handle/GenofondUA/79859/
f41e82e2af977ad073ed9983d5384661.pdf?sequence=1. (In Russ.)
Prokhorov A.M. (ed.). Bol’shaia Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia: v 30 t. T. 20 [Great Soviet Encyclopedia.
In 30 vols. Vol. 20]. 3rd ed. Moscow: Sovetskaia entsiklopediia, 1975. 608 p. (In Russ.)
Reutov V.P. Tipy pravoponimaniia i priroda pravotvorchestva [Types of Legal Understanding
and the Nature of Lawmaking]. In Syrykh V.M., Zanina M.A. (eds.). Pravotvorchestvo
v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: problemy teorii i praktiki: sbornik nauchnykh statei
[Lawmaking in the Russian Federation: Problems of Theory and Practice: Collection of
Scientific Articles]. Moscow: Russian Academy of Justice, 2010, pp. 80–86. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Kategorii “deistvitel’nost’” i “vozmozhnost’” v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom
prave [Categories of Reality and Possibility in Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 6, pp. 10–32. (In Russ.)
Sherstyuk V.M. Perekhod kolichestva v kachestvo v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom
prave [Transition from Quantity to Quality in Civil Procedural Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 1, pp. 10–30. (In Russ.)
Spirkin A.G. Kurs marksistskoi filosofii [Course of Marxist Philosophy]. 2nd ed. Moscow:
Mysl, 1966. 542 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
V.M. Sherstyuk (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department
of Civil Procedure, Law Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University (1 Leninskie
Gory, Moscow, 119991, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Sherstyuk V.M. Kategorii “prichina” i “sledstvie” v arbitrazhnom protsessual’nom i grazhdanskom
protsessual’nom prave [Cause and Consequences Categories in Arbitration
Procedural and Civil Procedure Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 9–31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-
2020-10-2-9-31
V.M. SHERSTYUK
Advertisement
Our partners
