M.L. GALPERIN, 

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Judiciary 

of the Law Faculty of the National Research University Higher School of Economics 

Identifying the object of the offense as a ground of responsibility in enforcement proceedings allows to determine its place in the legal system, to establish links with other elements of the relevant legal regime. The uniform normative task of enforcement is the correct and timely execution of acts of specialized agencies. In the article author examines in detail the object of legal wrongdoing in enforcement proceedings and comes to the conclusion that despite the necessity to secure of authority of public body, which issued the document, which is the subject for enforcement, for example the court decision, the interests of the particular creditor, but not public interests, comes to the foreground. Based on the submission above some practical conclusions are made regarding the possible future development of the system of enforcement (including liability measures), ensuring the balance of interests of debtor, creditor and state in contemporary enforcement proceedings. The author draws attention to examples of the implementation of various approaches in Russian legislation; considers the principles in force in the field of enforcement proceedings and their implementation. 

Keywords: enforcement proceedings; elements of wrongdoing; liability; object of offense; public interest; claimant. 

References 

Galperin M.L. Ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo: Uchebnik dlya bakalavriata i magistratury [Enforcement Proceedings: Textbook for Undergraduate Students and Master Studies Programs]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian) 

Galperin M.L. Otvetstvennost’ v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve: aktual’nye voprosy teorii i protsessual’noj politiki [Responsibility in Civil Proceedings: Topical Issues of Theory and Procedural Policy]. Moscow, 2011. (In Russian) 

Isaenkova O.V. Problemy ispolnitel’nogo prava v grazhdanskoj yurisdiktsii [Problems of Enforcement Law in Civil Jurisdiction]: Thesis Diss. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2003. (In Russian) 

Kleynman A.F. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook]. Moscow, 1940. (In Russian) Komarov A.N. Otvetstvennost’ za narusheniya zakonodatel’stva ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve, soderzhashchie priznaki administrativnogo pravonarusheniya [Responsibility for Violation of Legislation on Enforcement Proceedings, Containing Signs of an Administrative Offense]: Thesis Diss. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian) Kuznetsova N.F. (ed.). Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Obshchaya chast’. T. 1: Uchenie o prestuplenii [The Course of Criminal Law. A Common Part. Vol. 1: The Doctrine of Crime]. Moscow, 1999. (In Russian) 

Milkov A.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie zashchity grazhdanskikh prav i pravovykh interesov [Legal Regulation of the Protection of Civil Rights and Legal Interests]: Thesis Diss. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian) 

Salov A.A. Administrativno-deliktnye pravootnosheniya, voznikayushchie v protsesse prinuditel’nogo ispolneniya yurisdiktsionnykh aktov [Administrative and Tort Legal Relations Arising in the Process of Compulsory Enforcement of Jurisdictional Acts]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2013, no. 5. (In Russian) 

Serkov P.P. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ v rossijskom prave: sovremennoe osmyslenie i novye podkhody [Administrative Responsibility in Russian Law: Modern Thinking and New Approaches]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Galperin M.L. (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Judiciary of the Law Faculty of the National Research University Higher School of Economics (109028, Moscow, Bolshoi Trekhsvyatitelsky pereulok, 3; e-mail: [email protected]). 

Recommended citation 

Galperin M.L. Ob’ekt pravonarusheniya v sovremennom ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve (nachalo) [The Object of Violation of Law in Contemporary Enforcement Proceedings (beginning)]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 2, p. 168–182. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-2-168-182