We in a citing index:
Violation of Public Policy as a Ground for Refusal in Recognition and Enforcement of International Commercial Arbitration Awards
A.V. GABOV,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Deputy Director of the Institute of Legislation and
Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation,
Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
N.I. GAIDAENKO SHER,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Scientific Fellow of the Institute
of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government
of the Russian Federation
E.S. GANICHEVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Research Scientist of the Institute of Legislation
and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation
V.M. ZHUIKOV,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Legislation
and Procedure of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law
at the Government of the Russian Federation,
Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation
The effectiveness of using the possibility of resolving disputes through recourse of international commercial arbitration depends on whole legal policy, as well as on those statutes that establish the conditions and procedure for the implementation of decisions taken by the arbitration. The abstract possibility of applying to an arbitration court in the absence of a real opportunity to obtain execution on the decision does not help to expand the practice of using arbitration courts to resolve their disputes. That is why, by concluding the arbitration agreement, its participants count on the support and assistance of the state in the enforcement of the arbitration award. The article deals with the powers of Russian courts exercised by them while considering the applications for issuing the writs of execution with respect to international commercial arbitration awards. Special attention is paid to the issues of interpretation and application of legal definitions of «public policy» and «violation of public policy» in practice. Upon the analysis of the notions of «public policy» and «fundamental principles of the Russian law» the authors come to the conclusion that differences exist in their contents and meaning. The authors elaborate on the prospective of further development of the law enforcement practice of the State courts in the view of the recent reform of the legislation on domestic and international commercial arbitration and the reform of highest court instances of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: international commercial arbitration; public policy; fundamental principles of the Russian law; arbitration tribunal; enforcement of international commercial arbitration awards.
References
Abramova E.N., Averchenko N.N., Grachev V.V. [and others]; Sergeev A.P. (ed.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii. Chast’ tret’ya: uchebnoprakticheskij kommentarij [Commentary to the Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Part 3: Educational and Practical Commentary]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)
Asoskov A.V. Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha v novom obzore Prezidiuma VAS RF: Poisk pravil’nykh reshenij [Issues of International Arbitration in the New Review of the Presidium of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation: Search of the Correct Decisions]. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh = International Commercial Arbitration, 2006, no. 2. (In Russian)
Brun M.I. Publichnyj poryadok v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave [Public Order in Private International Law]. St. Petersburg, 1916. (In Russian)
Cordero-Moss G. International Arbitration Is Not Only International. In International Commercial Arbitration: Different Forms and Their Features. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Gabov A.V., Ganicheva E.S. Ustanovlenie arbitrazhnym sudom osnovanij dlya otkaza v vydache ispolnitel’nogo litsa na prinuditel’noe ispolnenie resheniya mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha [Establishment by the Arbitration Court Grounds for Refusal to Issue a Writ of Execution for the Enforcement of a Decision of International Commercial Arbitration]. In Kommentarij praktiki rassmotreniya ekonomicheskikh sporov (sudebno-arbitrazhnoj praktiki). Vyp. 23 [Commentary on the Practice of Considering Economic Disputes (Judicial-Arbitration Practice). Issue 23]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian)
Hvesenya V.M. Rekomendatsii po primeneniyu publichnogo poryadka v kachestve osnovaniya dlya otkaza v priznanii ili privedenii v ispolnenie mezhdunarodnykh arbitrazhnykh reshenij [Recommendations on Use of Public Order as a Ground for Refusal of Execution of International Arbitration Awards]. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh = International Commercial Arbitration, 2004, no. 3. (In Russian)
Karabel’nikov B.R. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: Uchebnik [International Commercial Arbitration: Textbook]. Moscow; Berlin, 2012. (In Russian)
Karabel’nikov B.R. Ogovorka o publichnom poryadke v novejshej praktike rossijskikh i zarubezhnykh sudov [The Public Policy Exception in the Nowadays Practice of Russian and Foreign Courts]. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh = International Commercial Arbitration, 2006, no. 1. (In Russian)
Komarov A.S., Karabel’nikov B.R. Praktika Federal’nogo arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga po delam, svyazannym s osparivaniem i privedeniem v ispolnenie mezhdunarodnykh arbitrazhnykh reshenij [Practice of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Moscow District on Cases Connected with Challenging and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha = Herald of International Commercial Arbitration, 2007, no. 4. (In Russian)
Kosters J. Public Policy in Private International Law. Yale Law Journal, 1920, Vol. 29, no. 7.
Krokhalev S.V. Kategoriya publichnogo poryadka v mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom protsesse [Category of Public Order in International Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2006. (In Russian)
Kudashkin V.V. Aktual’nye voprosy mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava [Actual Issues of Private International Law]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)
Kuznetsova O.A. Normy-printsipy rossijskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Norms-Principles of Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
Lalive P. Transnational (or Truly International) Public Policy and International Arbitration. In Sanders P. (ed.). Comparative Arbitration Practice and Public Policy in Arbitration, ICCA Congress Series, 1986 New York. Vol. 3.
Kluwer Law International, 1987. Lebedev S.N. Voprosy priznaniya i privedeniya v ispolnenie arbitrazhnykh reshenij v soglasheniyakh SSSR s inostrannymi gosudarstvami [Issues of Recognition for Execution of Arbitration Awards in Agreements of the USSR with Foreign States]. In Lebedev S.N. Izbrannye trudy po mezhdunarodnomu kommercheskomu arbitrazhu, pravu mezhdunarodnoj torgovli, mezhdunarodnomu chastnomu pravu [Selected Works on International Commercial Arbitration, Law of International Trading, Private International Law]. Moscow, 2009. (In Russian)
List F. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo v sistematicheskom izlozhenii [Private International Law in Systematic Review]. Yur’ev, 1909. (In Russian)
Lunts L.A. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. Obshchaya chast’ [Private International Law. General Part]. Moscow, 1973. (In Russian)
Information about the authors
Gabov A.V. (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Deputy Director of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (107078, Russia, Moscow, Bolshoy Kharitonievsky Lane, bldg. 22–24, 1A, 1BV; e-mail: [email protected]);
Gaidaenko Sher N.I. (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Scientific Fellow of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation (107078, Russia, Moscow, Bolshoy Kharitonievsky Lane, bldg. 22–24, 1A, 1BV; e-mail: [email protected]);
Ganicheva E.S. (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Research Scientist of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation (107078, Russia, Moscow, Bolshoy Kharitonievsky Lane, bldg. 22–24, 1A, 1BV; e-mail: [email protected]);
Zhuikov V.M. (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Legislation and Procedure of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law at the Government of the Russian Federation, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation (107078, Russia, Moscow, Bolshoy Kharitonievsky Lane, bldg. 22–24, 1A, 1BV; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Gabov A.V., Gaidaenko Sher N.I., Ganicheva E.S., Zhuikov V.M. Narushenie publichnogo poryadka kak osnovanie k otkazu v priznanii i ispolnenii resheniya mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha [Violation of Public Policy as a Ground for Refusal in Recognition and Enforcement of International Commercial Arbitration Awards]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure,2017, no. 5, p. 45–68. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-5-45-68
A.V. Gabov, N.I. Gaidaenko Sher, E.S. Ganicheva, V.M. Zhuikov
Advertisement
Our partners
