Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

CIVIL JUDICIAL PROCEDURES AND COMBATING VIOLATIONS OF FINANCIAL DISCIPLINE (ON PARTICIPATION OF BODIES OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE FOR FINANCIAL MONITORING IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE)

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AND PRACTICE


A.V. YUDIN

A.V. YUDIN,
Doctor of Legal Sciences,
Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law
of the Samara National Research University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-6-260-279

There has been a widespread trend as the initiation of civil or arbitration proceedings by
interested parties solely for the purpose of giving visibility to the legality of the possession
of funds or their recovery in the judicial practice of recent years. To prevent such cases, the
courts have begun to involve in bodies of the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring. This
creates a certain layer of problems, the main of which is the determination of the procedural
status of such a body. The author shows the fallacy of participation of financial control bodies
as third parties without independent claims. Alternative forms of participation of such
body and special means of reaction of court to the facts of violation of financial discipline
are offered. The mere possibility of using the process as a means of giving visibility to the
legality of financial transactions gives rise to a negative attitude, but this is complicated
by the external staging of the dispute, which is a serious problem for the court (given the
limited procedural means available to it and taking into account the consolidated position
of the parties). The bodies of the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring appear here as
some external factors, as instance, designed to complete belonging to the court’s authority.
The article assesses the legitimacy of involvement in the dispute of the authority for the
purpose of preventing violations of financial discipline by the parties to the process.

Keywords: private definition; civil procedure; arbitration procedure; third persons without
independent claims; bodies of the Federal service for financial monitoring; fictitious process;
imaginary process; re-enactment proceedings.

References

Molchanov V.V. Sobiranie dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom protsesse [Collecting Evidence
in Civil Procedure]. Moscow, 1991. (In Russian)
Vaskovsky E.V.; Tomsinov V.A. (ed.). Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Civil Procedure:
Textbook]. Moscow, 2003. (In Russian)
Yablochkov T. Material’nye priznaki ponyatiya sudebnogo priznaniya v grazhdanskom
protsesse [Material Signs of the Concept of Judicial Recognition in Civil Proceedings].
Zhurnal Ministerstva yustitsii = Journal of the Ministry of Justice, 1915, no. 3.
(In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civil Procedure].
Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Yudelson K.S. Problema dokazivaniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [The
Problem of Proof in Soviet Civil Procedure]. In Izbrannoe. Sovetskij notariat. Problema
dokazyvaniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [Selected: Soviet Notaries. The Problem
of Evidence in Soviet Civil Procedure]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Yudin A.V. Instsenirovka protsessual’nykh dejstvij v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[Dramatization of Proceedings in Civil Proceedings]. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian
Justice, 2007, no. 10. (In Russian)

Information about the author

Yudin A.V. (Samara, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department
of Civil Procedure and Business Law of the Samara National Research University
(443011, Samara, Academic Pavlov St., 1, Bldg. 24, Room 212; e-mail: udin77@
mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Yudin A.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo i protivodejstvie narusheniyam finansovoj
distsipliny (k voprosu ob uchastii organov Rosfinmonitoringa v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse) [Civil Judicial Procedures and Combating Violations of Financial
Discipline (on Participation of Bodies of the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring
in Civil and Arbitration Procedure)]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of
Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 6, p. 260–279. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-
8-6-260-279

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords