Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

SOME ISSUES OF THE PRACTICE OF THE APPLICATION OF PUBLIC POLICY CLAUSE BY THE STATE COURTS IN THE PROCEDURE DEDICATED TO CANCELLATION (ENFORCEMENT) OF ARBITRAL AWARDS

TRIBUNE OF YOUNG SCIENTIST


A.V. BRUTSKIY

A.V. BRUTSKIY,
Student of the Law Faculty
of the Lomonosov Moscow State University

The article is devoted to the consideration of the actual problems of the application
by the state courts of a public policy exception in the process dedicated to cancellation
(enforcement) of arbitral awards on the grounds of concentration of publicly significant
elements in the legal relationship, so the arbitral award declaring contrary to the
fundamental legal principles (public policy). The purpose of this article is to identify and
analyze those grounds, the complex of which courts justify as the presence or absence in
the legal relationship of such a concentration of publicly significant elements, an analysis
of judicial practice in which the courts faced such a question, as well as assessment of such
practice. In particular, complex of the following circumstances is recognized by the courts
as a basis for ascertaining the presence of such a concentration of publicly significant
elements in the legal relationship: the use of budget funds, the determination of state
participation, and the public interest in legal relations. The article analyzes each of these
grounds and the way in which the presence or absence of such grounds is established in
the legal relationship. Moreover, this article considers the possibility of using estoppel in
respect of a party that did not object to the competence of arbitral tribunal and raised
objections only after a decision against it had been taken.
Keywords: civil procedure; civil law; international private law; arbitral tribunal;
enforcement of arbitral award; cancellation of arbitral award; public policy.

References

Belov A.P. Mezhdunarodnoe predprinimatel’skoe pravo: Prakticheskoe posobie [International
Business Law: A Practical Guide]. Moscow, 2001. (In Russian)
Cherepakhin B.B. K voprosu o chastnom i publichnom prave [On Private and Public
Law]. In X sbornik trudov professorov i prepodavatelej Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta
[X Collection of Works of Professors and Lecturers of the Irkutsk State University].
Irkutsk, 1926. (In Russian)
Fouchard P., Gaillard E. (eds.). Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial
Arbitration. Kluwer Law International, 1999.
Krokhalev S.V. Kategoriya publichnogo poryadka v mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom
protsesse [The Category of Public Policy in International Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg,
2006. (In Russian)
Kurochkin S.A. Tretejskoe razbiratel’stvo i mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh
[Arbitration and International Commercial Arbitration]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian)
Rozhkova M.A. Razreshenie i uregulirovanie kommercheskikh sporov [Resolution
and Settlement of Commercial Disputes]. Hozyajstvo i pravo (prilozhenie) = Economy
and Law (annex), 2005, no. 1. (In Russian)
Syrykh V.M. Publichnyj interes – osnovopolagayushchaya kategoriya publichnogo prava
[Public Interest as a Fundamental Category of Public Law]. In Khabrieva T.Ya. (ed.).
Teoriya gosudarstva i prava v nauke, obrazovanii, praktike [Theory of State and Law in
Science, Education and Practice]. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)
Tolstykh V.L. Publichnyj porjadok i pravovaya nesovmestimost’ [Public Order and
Legal Incompatibility]. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava = Journal of International
Private Law, 2003, nos. 1–2(39–40). (In Russian)
Zvekov V.P. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Kurs lektsij [International Private Law:
Course of Lectures]. Moscow, 1999. (In Russian)

Information about the author

Brutskiy A.V. (Moscow, Russia) – Student of the Law Faculty of the Lomonosov
Moscow State University (119991, GSP-1, Moscow, Leninskie Gory, Bldg. 13-14; e-mail:
alexanderbrutskiy@gmail.com).

Recommended citation

Brutskiy A.V. Nekotorye voprosy praktiki primeneniya ogovorki o publichnom poryadke
pri rassmotrenii gosudarstvennymi sudami zayavlenij ob otmene (vydache ispolnitel’nogo
lista na prinuditel’noe ispolnenie) sostoyavshikhsya arbitrazhnykh reshenij [Some Issues
of the Practice of the Application of Public Policy Clause by the State Courts in the Procedure
Dedicated to Cancellation (Enforcement) of Arbitral Awards]. Вестник граж-
данского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 4, p. 229–246 . (In Russian)
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-4-229-246

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords