Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Invalidity of Waiver of the Right of Recourse to the Courts in Civil Procedure: Theoretical and Practical Issues

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


A.V. Yudin

A.V. Yudin, 
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedural 
and Business Law of the Faculty of Law of the Samara National Research University 

The procedural legislation (as well as the regulatory provisions derived from it) provides for the invalidity of waiver of the right of recourse to the courts. However, this fairly traditional provision of the procedural law in judicial practice is interpreted and applied in a variety of ways, up to an unreasonable listing of the standard contractual conditions under which the person declares that he has no claims to the counterparty. The article deals with the scope of application of this prohibition in the field of material and procedural legal relations, the ways of its actualization in various judicial acts. The author proposes to distinguish between cases of the invalidity of waiver of the right to file a claim and cases in which there is a waiver of the material and legal claims to the counterparty. The article draws attention to the fact that in a number of cases the reference to the invalidity of waiver of the right to judicial protection, previously produced by the person himself, is an example of the contradictory behavior of the subject of civil legal relations. 

Keywords: right of recourse to the courts; invalidity of waiver of the right of recourse to the courts; waiver of right; consequences of waiver of the right of recourse to the courts.

References 

Bojko T.S. Otkaz ot prava i vozderzhanie ot osushchestvleniya prava: rossijskij i angloamerikanskij podhody [Waiver of Right and Forbearance: Russian and English-American Approachs]. Zakon = Law, 2012, no. 3. (In Russian) 
Filippov P.M., Belonozhkin A.Yu. Novoe opredelenie sub’ektivnogo grazhdanskogo prava i zloupotreblenie im [New Definition of a Subjective Civil Right and Abusive Practice]. Volgograd, 2009. (In Russian) 
Gromoshina N.A. Nuzhno li bol’she prav? [Do We Need More Rights?]. In Tumanov D.A., Zaharova M.V. (eds.). Sluzhenie pravu: Sbornik statej [Service for Law: Collection of Articles]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian) 
Nechaev V.I. (ed.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii (postatejnyj) [Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2008. (In Russian) 
Os’kina I., Lupu A. Zalogodatel’ i zalogoderzhatel’ v odnoj svyazke [Pledgor and Holder of Pledge: Tied Together]. ezh-Yurist = ezh-Lawyer, 2012, no. 46. (In Russian) 
Pepelyaev S.G. O pravovoj prirode instituta sudebnyh raskhodov [On Legal Nature of the Institute of Court Costs]. Zakon = Law, 2013, no. 11. (In Russian) 
Rudenko E. Pravo na isk. Tezisy [Right to Sue. Points]. Jurist= Lawyer, 2006, no. 3. (In Russian) 
Sedova Zh.I., Zajtseva N.V. Printsip estoppel’ i otkaz ot prava v kommercheskom oborote Rossijskoj Federatsii [Principle Estoppel and Waiver of Right in Commercial Exchange of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2014. (In Russian) 
Sozanova M.V. Mirovoe soglashenie po trudovym sporam [Voluntary Settlement of Labor Disputes]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Russian Laws: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2013, no. 8. (In Russian) 
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook]. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2010. (In Russian) 
Vavilin E.V. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskih prav [Exercise and Defense of Civil Rights]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)
Vavilin E.V. Ponyatie i mehanizm osushchestvleniya grazhdanskih prav i ispolneniya obyazannostej [Conception and Mechanism of Exercise of Civil Rights and Execution of Duties]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2004, no. 5. (In Russian) 
Vikut M.A. (ed.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii (postatejnyj) [Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2014. (In Russian) 
Voronov A.F. Grazhdanskij protsess: evolyutsiya dispozitivnosti [Civil Procedure: Evolution of Optionality]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Zhujkov V.M., Puchinsky V.K., Treushnikov M.K. (eds.). Nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii (postatejnyj) [Science-Practical Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. Moscow, 2003. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Yudin A.V. (Samara, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedural and Business Law of the Faculty of Law of the Samara National Research University (443086, Samara, Moskovskoe shosse, 34; e-mail: udin77@mail.ru). 

Recommended citation 

Yudin A.V. Nedejstvitel’nost’ otkaza ot prava na obrashchenie v sud v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: teoretiko-prakticheskie problemy [Invalidity of Waiver of the Right of Recourse to the Courts in Civil Procedure: Theoretical and Practical Issues]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 3, p. 11–33. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-3-11-33

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords