Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Categories of the Whole and Part in Civil and Arbitration Procedural Law

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


V.M. Sherstyuk

V.M. SHERSTYUK,
Doctor of Legal Sciences,
Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Law Faculty
of the Lomonosov Moscow State University

In the article, relying on “the whole” and “part” categories, the author came to the
conclusion that not only the whole can be not only the system of civil procedural law, but
summative (non-systemic) legal entities, part of which are the rules and institutions of civil
procedural law, and the rules and institutions of other branches of law and legal entities.
Summative legal entities are also integrity, parts of which are heterogeneous and united
not by the subject of legal regulation, i.e. not on objective (system), but by other subjective
characteristics (goals, the existence of general principles, stages of development of activities,
similar in content institutions, etc.). There are identified and addressed integral summative
(not system) entities, including: 1) norms and institutions of civil procedural law and
enforcement proceedings; 2) norms and institutions of civil procedural law and norms
and institutions of arbitration procedural law, norms regulating notarial proceedings, as
well as regulating the activities of arbitration courts and commissions on labor disputes;
3) branches of civil procedural, criminal procedural and judicial law (judicial law);
4) legal institutions of different branches of law. Summative (non-system) entities are
making a worthy contribution to the improvement of civil procedural law and other
branches of law. The author considers highly relevant research summative (non-system)
entities for both the theory of civil procedure law and practice.

Keywords: the whole; part; connection; system; summative legal entities.

References

Afanasyev V.G. O printsipakh klassifikatsii tselostnykh system [On Principles of the
Classification of Holistic Systems]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 1963,
no. 5. (In Russian)
Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenij. V 10 t. T. 2: Spetsial’nye voprosy pravovedeniya
[Collection Works. In 10 vol. Vol. 2: Special Issues of Jurisprudence]. Moscow, 2010.
(In Russian)
Alekseev V.P., Panin A.V. Filosofiya: Uchebnik [Philosophy: Textbook]. 4th ed. Moscow,
2015. (In Russian)
Bratus S.N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The Subject and System
of Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, 1963. (In Russian)
Chudinovskikh K.A. Podvedomstvennost’ v sisteme grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo
protsessual’nogo prava [Jurisdiction in the System of Civil and Arbitration Procedural
Law]. St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Russian)
Gurvich M.A. Printsipy sovetskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Principles of Soviet Procedural
Law]. In Trudy VYuZI. T. III: Voprosy grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo, grazhdanskogo
i trudovogo prava [Proceedings of the All-Union Correspondence Institute of
Law. Vol. III: Issues of Civil Procedure, Civil and Labor Law]. Moscow, 1965.
Kerimov D.A. Filosofskie problemy prava [Philosophical Problems of Law]. Moscow,
1972. (In Russian)
Kurochkin S.A.; Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Chastnye i publichnye nachala v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse [Private and Public Principles in Civil Procedure]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Maleshin D.Ya. Ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo (funktsii suda) [Enforcement Proceedings
(Functions of the Court)]. Moscow, 2003. (In Russian)
Melnikov A.A. Konstitutsiya SSSR i problema sudebnogo prava [The Constitution of
the USSR and the Problem of Court Law]. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence, 1979, no. 6.
(In Russian)
Muradyan E.M. Sudebnoe pravo (v kontekste tryokh protsessual’nykh kodeksov):
Monografiya [Court Law (in the Context of Three Procedural Codes): Monograph].
Moscow, 2003. (In Russian)
Muradyan E.M. Sudebnoe pravo [Court Law]. St. Petersburg, 2007. (In Russian)
Osipov Yu.K. Podvedomstvennost’ yuridicheskikh del: Uchebnoe posobie [Jurisdiction
of Legal Files: Tutorial]. Sverdlovsk, 1973. (In Russian)
Osokina G.L. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva Rossii. Obshchaya chast’: Uchebnoe
posobie [The Course of Civil Legal Proceedings in Russia. General Part: Tutorial].
Tomsk, 2002. (In Russian)
Polyansky N.N., Strogovich M.S., Savitsky V.M., Melnikov A.A. Problemy sudebnogo
prava [Problems of Judicial Law]. Moscow, 1983. (In Russian)
Popova Yu.A. Teoriya protsessual’nykh (sudoproizvodstvennykh) form realizatsii
sudebnoj vlast’yu funktsij pravosudiya (retrospektivnyj analiz) [The Theory of Procedural (Judicial) Forms of Realization by the Judicial Power of the Functions of Justice
(Retrospective Analysis)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure,
2012, no. 2. (In Russian)
Reshetnikova I.V. Dokazatel’stvennoe pravo v rossijskom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[Evidence Law in Russian Civil Procedure]: Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law
Sciences. Yekaterinburg, 1997. (In Russian)
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure]. 2nd ed.
Moscow, 2014. (In Russian)
Semenov V.M. Konstitutsionnye printsipy grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Constitutional
Principles of Civil Proceedings]. Moscow, 1982. (In Russian)
Sergun A.K. Problemy ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva v sovetskom grazhdanskom
protsesse [Problems of Enforcement in Soviet Civil Procedure]: Thesis for a Doctor
Degree in Law Sciences. Moscow, 1980. (In Russian)
Shcheglov V.N. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo (ponyatie, predmet
i metod, printsipy, grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravootnoshenie) [Soviet Civil Procedural
Law (Concept, Subject and Method, Principles, Civil Procedural Legal Relationship)].
Tomsk, 1976. (In Russian)
Sherstyuk V.M. Sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava (voprosy
teorii) [The System of Soviet Civil Procedural Law (Theory Issues)]. Moscow, 1989. (In
Russian)
Sherstyuk V.M. Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva:
Sbornik statej [Modern Problems of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings: Collection
of Articles]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian)
Spirkin A.S. Kurs marksistskoj filosofii [The Course of Marxist Philosophy]. 2nd ed.
Moscow, 1966. (In Russian)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook].
6th ed. Moscow, 2018. (In Russian)
Yakovlev V.F. Obshchaya chast’ grazhdanskogo prava v sovremennom zakonodatel’stve
i yuridicheskoj praktike [The General Part of Civil Law in the Modern Legislation and
Legal Practice]. Sverdlovsk, 1979. (In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook]. 5th ed.
Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)
Yudin A.V. Osoboe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Special Proceedings in
Arbitration Procedure]. Samara, 2002. (In Russian)
Yudin A.V. Vidy sudoproizvodstva v arbitrazhnom protsesse: Uchebnoe posobie [Types
of Legal Proceedings in Arbitration Procedure: Textbook]. Samara, 2002. (In Russian)
Zaytsev I.M. Nauchnoe nasledie. V 3 t. T. 2: Monografii. Chast’ 2: 1982–1990 gg. [Scientific
Heritage. In 3 vol. Vol. 2: Monographs. Part 2: 1982–1990]. Saratov, 2009. (In Russian)
Zeyder N.B. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [The
Subject and System of Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence, 1962,
no. 3. (In Russian)

Information about the author

Sherstyuk V.M. (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the
Department of Civil Procedure of the Law Faculty of the Lomonosov Moscow State
University (119991, GSP-1, Moscow, Leninskie Gory, Bldg. 13-14; e-mail: civil_proceedings@law.msu.ru).

Recommended citation

Sherstyuk V.M. Kategorii «tseloe» i «chast’» v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsessual’nom prave [Categories of the Whole and Part in Civil and Arbitration Procedural
Law]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 3,
p. 11–39. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-3-11-39

 1a.jpg  баннер2.jpg  баннер3.jpg

Keywords