Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

On the Temporal Aspect of the Application of Part 8 of Article 291.6 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation

M.Sh. PATSATSIYA, 
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Leading Researcher 
of the Russian State University of Justice, 
Partner of the Non-Profit Partnership «The First Bar of Moscow» 

One of new term for appeal which was appeared by reforming of the system of cassation appeal in the frame of arbitration proceedings is the term of appeal against an official of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation an judgement of a judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation about refusing the transfer of a cassation appeal, a submission, which were submitted according with article 291.1 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation for consideration in the court session of the Judicial Board of Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. But more significant sign of this term in practice is that it is not established directly. And certainty of that term is obviously necessary, in particular, to avoid further accusations of arbitrariness of the implementation of the official of the Supreme Court of its discretionary powers. This article examines the actual temporal aspects of the implementation of this power in arbitration procedure, which, in fact, have not yet become the subject of special research. The author gives examples of judicial practice and the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights concerning the temporal aspect of appeal of the definitions of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

References

Absalyamov A.V., Abushenko D.B., Arsenov I.G. et al.; Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Kommentarij k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii (postatejnyj) [Commentary to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. 3rd ed.,
revised and enlarged. Moscow, 2011. (In Russian)

Balashov A.N., Mishutina Ye.I. Aksiologicheskie kategorii instituta protsessual’noj analogii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Axiological Categories of the Institute of Procedural Analogy in Civil Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2010, no. 8, p. 43–46. (In Russian)

Baturina N.A. Protsedura predvaritel’nogo izucheniya kassatsionnoj zhaloby (fil’tratsiya): nedostatki pravovogo regulirovaniya [The Procedure for the Preliminary Examination of the Cassation Petition (Filtration): The Defects of the Legal Regulation]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 11, p. 42–46. (In Russian)

Kiselev A. Sistema sudov obshchej yurisdiktsii: rassmatrivaetsya kassatsionnaya zhaloba [The System of Courts of General Jurisdiction: The Cassation Petition is Considered]. SPS «ConsultantPlus». 2013. (In Russian)

Kovtkov D.I. Kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse [Cassation Proceedings in Civil Procedure]. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)

Kovtun N.N. Ob «izvrashchennom» predmete nadzorno-kassatsionnoj formy proverki: zakonodatel’stvo, teoriya, praktika [On the «Perverse» Subject of the Supervisory-Cassation Form of Verification: Legislation, Theory, Practice]. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo = Criminal Proceedings, 2016, no. 4, p. 37–44. (In Russian)

Kozhemyako A.S. Kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom sude: teoriya i praktika [Cassation Proceedings in Arbitration Court: Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)

Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.). Postatejnyj kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu
kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii [Commentary to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian
Federation]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)

Moiseev S.V. Otdel’nye napravleniya sovershenstvovaniya kassatsionnogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse [Separate Directions for Improving Cassation Proceedings in Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure,
2016, no. 2, p. 65–78. (In Russian)

Patsatsiya M.Sh. O diskretsionnyh polnomochiyah dolzhnostnyh lits Verhovnogo Suda RF v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessah [On Discretionary Powers of Officials of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 5, p. 10–61. (In Russian)

Taj Yu.V. Cherez ternii k zvezdam, ili Sudebnaya reforma, dva goda, polet normal’nyj? [Through Thorns to the Stars, or Judicial Reform, Two Years, is the Flight Normal?]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossijskoj Federatsii = Herald of Economic Justice
of the Russian Federation, 2016, no. 9, p. 64–83. (In Russian)

Information about the author

Patsatsiya M.Sh. (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Russian State University of Justice, Partner of the Non-Profit Partnership «The First Bar of Moscow» (117418, Moscow, Novocheryomushkinskaya St., 69; e-mail: besleti@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Patsatsiya M.Sh. O temporal’nom aspekte primeneniya ch. 8 st. 291.6 APK RF [On the Temporal Aspect of the Application of Part 8 of Article 291.6 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 4, p. 12–38. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-4-12-38

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

M.Sh. Patsatsiya