OBJECTS OF REVISION IN CASES 

ON NEW AND NEWLY DISCOVERED FACTS, AND SUBJECTS, 

INITIATES THE REVISION 

L.A. TEREKHOVA 

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Civil Procedure 

Department of Omsk State University 

The article analyses problems, associated with the determination of judicial acts (objects) that may be reviewed due to the new and newly discovered facts; as well as range of persons (subjects) that may apply to the court in such cases. The research is based on the provisions of the Civil Procedure and Arbitration Procedure Codes and the Code of Administrative Proceedings, as well as on the positions of the Supreme Court and Supreme Court of Arbitration. Among the objects of revision may be distinguished court’s decisions, some kind of definitions and the court order. The subjects, entitled to lodge an application for review, are, in the author’s view, the persons, taking part in the proceedings. A proposal to vest persons that did not take part in the proceedings, but considering their rights and obligations to be affected by court’s ruling, with a right to lodge such an application is approached with criticism. The rights of public prosecutor in this stage of court proceedings are to be restricted as well. 

Keywords: review; newly discovered facts; new facts; judicial self-control; court order; competence of the public prosecutor; persons that did not take part in case consideration