Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Counterclaim in Disputes Arising from Public Legal Relations

COUNTERCLAIM IN DISPUTES ARISING 
FROM PUBLIC LEGAL RELATIONS 

Is dedicated to the blessed memory of N.I. Klein 

A.R. SULTANOV, 
Head of legal Department PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim” 

The article is devoted to the implementation of the Institute a counterclaim in disputes flowing from public relations. The author notes that in Сivil Procedure Code of RSFSR, and then in Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation procedure for consideration of cases of public relations included the possibility of such cases where the applicant has been a citizen or association of citizens. The cases, where the requirements were presented by public authorities to citizens, such as the collection of taxes, the courts of general jurisdiction considered in adversary proceedings. In accordance with the principle of optionality defendant has the right to choose their own method of protection against the claim. In some cases, a counterclaim is the only way to protect the defendant. The impossibility of appeal against unjustified refusal to accept the counterclaim due to the lack of conditions stipulated by article 138 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, puts the defendant in an unequal position in relation to the plaintiff’s right to judicial protection. Such approaches, recognizing the right to file a private complaint to definition about refusal in acceptance of the counterclaim, were divided in some courts. 

Keywords: counter-claim; proceedings on cases arising from public legal relations.

References 

Bespalov Ju. F. Kommentarij k Kodeksu administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federacii (postatejnyj nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij) [Commentary on the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation (itemized scientific and practical commentary)]. M., 2015. P. 37. (In Russian). 
Bortnikova N.A. Obzhalovanie opredelenija suda pervoj instancii ob otkaze v prinjatii vstrechnogo iska [The appeal of the court of first instance on the rejection of the counterclaim]. Case comment. Ed. K.B. Yaroshenko. 2015. Vol. 20. P. 157–170. (In Russian). 
Fursov D.A. Predmet, sistema i osnovnye principy arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo prava (problemy teorii i praktiki) [Subject, the system and the basic principles of arbitration law (theory and practice)]. M., 1999. P. 310. (In Russian).
Gros’ L.A. Kommentarij k st. 137 GPK RF [Commentary on Art. 137 Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation]. Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Ed. M.A. Vikut. M., 2013. (In Russian). 
Klejn N.I. Vstrechnyj isk v sude i arbitrazhe [Counterclaim in court and arbitration]. M., 1964. (In Russian). 
Klejn N.I. Osparivanie organom ispolnitel’noj vlasti predpisanija antimonopol’nogo organa ob otmene normativnogo akta [Challenging the executive authority of the antimonopoly body on the abolition of the normative act]. Comments of judicial practice. Vol. 10. Ed. V.F. Yakovlev. M.: Juridical literature, 2003. P. 72–83. (In Russian). 
Kolosova V.V. Vidy iskov v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve. Gruppovye i proizvodnye iski [Types of claims in civil proceedings. Group and derivative suits]. System ConsultantPlus. 2010. (In Russian). 
Koncevoj A. Processual’nye osobennosti rassmotrenija del, voznikajushhih iz publichnyh pravootnoshenij s uchastiem prokurora [Remedial features of consideration of cases arising from public relations with the participation of the prosecutor]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij processs = Arbitrate and civil procedure. 2009. No. 9. P. 5–8. (In Russian). 
Hisamov A.H., Shakir’janov R.V. Nekotorye voprosy sistematizacii norm grazhdanskogo processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva v kontekste ego unifikacii [Some questions to systematize the rules of civil procedure law in the context of its unification]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa = Herald of Civil procedure. 2015. No. 1. P. 71–87. (In Russian). 
Vas’kovskij E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo processa [Textbook of civil procedure]. M.: Gorodec, 2003. (In Russian). 
Rozhkova M.A., Glazkova M.E., Savina M.A. Aktual’nye problemy unifikacii grazhdanskogo processual’nogo i arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva: monografija [Actual problems of the unification of civil procedure and arbitration procedure legislation: Monograph]. Ed. M.A. Rozhkova. M., 2015. (In Russian). 
Semenov B.S. Osobennosti proizvodstva po delam, voznikajushhim iz publichnyh pravootnoshenij [Features of the cases arising from public relations]. Administrator suda = Court administrator. 2014. No. 1. P. 16–20. (In Russian). 
Simonjan S.L. O proekte Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federacii [About the Draft the Code of administrative proceedings of the Russian Federation]. Administrativnoe pravo i process = Administrative law and procedure. 2006. No. 1. (In Russian). Sultanov A.R. Ob jeffektivnyh sredstvah zashhity ot neobosnovannogo vosstanovlenija processual’nyh srokov [On effective means of protection against unreasonable recovery of procedural deadlines]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa = Herald of Civil procedure. 2016. No. 1. P. 56–77. (In Russian). 

Information about the author: 

   Sultanov A.R. (Niznekamsk) – Head of Legal Department “Nizhnekamskneftekhim” (423574, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk city, PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”; e-mail: [email protected]).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

A.R. Sultanov