T.V. Solovyova, 

Doctor of Legal Sciences, 

Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure 

of the Saratov State Law Academy 

The article is devoted to consideration of the value of judgments of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights in the concept of unified civil procedural legislation. The value and character of decisions of supreme judicial authorities can be determined by analyzing the competence of these authorities. We note that the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation as the authority supervising the activity of courts, stabilizes the enforcement process to further ensure the full protection of rights and interests of stakeholders. In addition to the supervisory authority, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation is entitled to interpret regulations of the legislation. In his turn the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the field of civil procedure provides: interpretation of the Constitution of the Russian Federation; settlement of questions on the constitutionality of legal rules applying in civil proceedings, at the request of courts; administration of complaints about violation of constitutional rights and freedoms by applied in a particular case law. The author makes a conclusion about the need to fix mandatory values, as well as ways to overcome the binding force of these acts for courts. 

Keywords: judgment; Supreme Court of the Russian Federation; Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; European Court of Human Rights; civil procedure; court proceedings. 

References 

  Isaenkova O.V. (ed.). Sootvetstvie grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva i sudebnoj praktiki Rossijskoj Federatsii po grazhdanskim delam mezhdunarodnym standartam sudebnoj zashchity: Monografija [Correspondence of Civil Procedural Law and Judicial Practice of the Russian Federation for Civil Cases to International Standards of Judicial Protection: Monograph]. Moscow, 2013, p. 33. (In Russian) Savel’eva O.A. Sudebnoe tolkovanie v primenenii ugolovnogo zakona [Judicial Interpretation in the Application of Criminal Law]. System «Garant». (In Russian) 

   Gros’ L.A. O postanovlenii Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF «O sudebnom reshenii» [About the Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation «On the Court Decision»]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2004, no. 10, pp. 37–43. (In Russian) 

   Valeev D.H. Sudebnaja praktika v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Judicial Practice in Enforcement Proceedings]. In Isaenkova O.V. (ed.). Perspektivy reformirovanija grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava: Sbornik statej po materialam Mejdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferentsii (g. Saratov, 21 fevralja 2015 g.) [Prospects for Reform of Civil Procedural Law: Collection of Articles on the Materials of the International Scientific Practical Conference (Saratov, February 21, 2015)]. Saratov, 2015, pp. 68–69. (In Russian) 

   Petrov A.A. K diskussii o pravovoj prirode reshenij Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Discussion on the Legal Nature of Decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Akademicheskij juridicheskij zhurnal = Academic Law Journal, 2002, no. 3, pp. 24–26. (In Russian) 

   Tumanov V.A. Pjat’ let konstitutsionnoj justitsii v Rossii: uroki, problemy, perspektivy [Five Years of Constitutional Justice in Russia: Lessons, Problems and Prospects]. Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF = Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, 1996, no. 6, pp. 11–12. (In Russian) 

   Bondar’ N.S. Konventsionnaja jurisdiktsija Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka v sootnoshenii s kompetentsiej Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Conventional Jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights in Relation to the Competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 6, pp. 113–127. (In Russian) 

   Sultanov A.R. Vlijanie na pravo Rossii Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnyh svobod i pretsedentov Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [The Impact on Law of Russia of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Test Cases of the European Court of Human Rights]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2007, no. 12, pp. 85–92. (In Russian) 

   Yentin L.M. (ed.). Evropejskoe pravo. Pravo Evropejskogo Sojuza i pravovoe obespechenie zashchity prav cheloveka: Uchebnik dlja vuzov [European Law. The EU Law and the Legal Protection of Human Rights: A Textbook for High Schools]. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2007, p. 362 (In Russian) 

   Popova Ju.A. Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo (sudoproizvodstvennogo) prava Rossii [Modern Problems of Civil Procedural Law in Russia]. Krasnodar, 2012, pp. 299–300. (In Russian) 

   Vereshchagin A.N. Sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v Rossii. Sravnitel’no-pravovye aspekty [Judicial Lawmaking in Russia. Comparative Legal Aspects]. Moscow, 2004, p. 155. (In Russian) 

   Bodrjagina O. Pretsedent: podskazka ili ukazka? [Interv’ju s T.G. Morshchakovoj] [Precedent: Prompt or Pointer? [Interview with T.G. Morschakova]]. ezh-Jurist = ezh- Lawyer, 2010, no. 15, pp. 1, 8–9. (In Russian) 

   Zhilin G.A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual’nye voprosy [Justice in Civil Cases: Current Issues]. Moscow, 2010, p. 383. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

  Solovieva T.V. (Saratov) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy (410056, Saratov, Chernyshevsky st., 104; e-mail: [email protected]).