We in a citing index:
The Category of «Risk» in Civil Procedure
A.V. Yudin,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure
and Business Law of the Samara State University
The article discusses the little-studied problem of procedural risk in civil procedure. The author addresses the issues of varieties procedural risk, of the consequences of risk, of the regularities of its development and manifestations. Procedural risk accompanies the actions or omissions of persons involved in the case. The scope of the risk is not only the fact of going to court, but the fact suing a certain price claims, and subject to the claim. Thus, the plaintiff bears the risk of an erroneous election of remedies, despite the fact that this risk is partly counterbalanced by active actions by a court with disabilities on the selection of the plaintiff «correct» way of protection. The implementation aspect of the process granted by the special rights has a decisive influence on the outcome of the case, and therefore, the risks from faulty instructive actions are quite high. The renunciation of suit, based on the defendant’s promise to pay later refused duty, do not allow the applicant to reapply the same requirements and it is deprived of the right to judicial protection; hasty acceptance of the claim by the respondent will not allow him to later fallacy and (or) disadvantage to make a confession; the agreement of lawsuit concluded at unfavourable or hazy conditions, makes the unpromising position the parties wishing to review the terms of this agreement, etc.
Keywords: procedural risk; proceedings; procedural omissions; procedural behavior.
References
Oigenzikht V.A. Problema riska v grazhdanskom prave (chast’ obshhaya) [The Problem of Risk in Civil Law (general part)] (in Russian). Dushanbe, 1972.
Grinberg M.S. Problemy proizvodstvennogo riska v ugolovnom prave [Problems of Procedural Risk in the Criminal Law] (in Russian). M., 1963.
Reshetnikova I.V. Teoriya protsessual’nogo riska [The Theory of Procedural Risk] (in Russian) // Law. 2012. No. 6. P. 117–122.
Reshetnikova I.V. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo. Kak budut rassmatrivat’sya dela po novym pravilam [Summary Proceedings. How Will Be Considered Case by New Rules] (in Russian) // Arbitration Practice. 2012. No. 9.
Gal’perin M.L. Budushchee ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: problemy vzaimodeistviya material’nogo i protsessual’nogo prava [Future Enforcement Proceedings: Problems of Interaction of Substantive and Procedural Law] (in Russian) // Law. 2012. No. 4. P. 49.
Molchanov V.V. Razvitie ucheniya o svidetelyakh i svidetel’skikh pokazaniyakh v grazhdanskom protsesse [Development of the Doctrine of Witnesses and Witness Statements in Civil Process] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 2009.
Vas’kovsky E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Textbook of Civil Procedure] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. P. 194.
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v mekhanizme realizatsii norm grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Legal Facts in the Mechanism of Implementation of the Rules of Civil Procedural Law] (in Russian). Ekaterinburg, 1992. P. 154.
Yudin A.V. Problemy vzaimosvyazannosti grazhdanskikh del [Problems of Interconnectedness of Civil Cases] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013. No. 8. P. 46–56.
Borisova E.A. Apellyatsiya v grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) protsesse [Appeals in Civil (Arbitration) Process] (in Russian). 3rd ed. M., 2008. P. 172–186.
Afanas’ev S.F. Primenenie printsipa zapreta povorota k khudshemu v grazhdanskom protsesse [Use of the Principle of Non-Turn for the Worse in Civil Proceedings] (in Russian) // Russian Justice. 2011. No. 7. P. 21–24.
Shemeneva O.N. Neosporennye obstoyatel’stva v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess [Uncontested Circumstances in the Arbitration Process] (in Russian). 2011. No. 2. P. 19–22.
Yudin A.V. Popravki v Arbitrazhnyi protsessual’nyi kodeks RF: molchanie imeet znachenie [Amendments to the Code of Arbitration Procedure of the Russian Federation: The Silence is Important] (in Russian) // ej-Lawyer. 2010. Oct. No. 41. P. 5.
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civilistic Process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 79. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Pravovye riski [Legal Risks] (in Russian) // Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, and Practice. 2012. No. 2. P. 88.
Bratus’ S.N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ i zakonnost’ (ocherk teorii) [Legal Responsibility and Legitimacy (theory sketch)] (in Russian). M., 2001. P. 168.
Aryamov A.A. Obshchaya teoriya riska (yuridicheskii, ekonomicheskii i psikhologicheskii analiz) [The General Theory of Risk (legal, economic, and psychological analysis)] (in Russian): Monograph. M., 2009. P. 16.
Ozerov I.N. Kategoriya riska v operativno-rozysknoi deyatel’nosti [Risk Category in Operational Investigations] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2001. Oigenzikht V.A. Volya i risk [Will and Risk] // Jurisprudence. 1984. No. 4. P. 41.
Zeider N.B. Sudebnoe reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu [A Court Decision in a Civil Case] (in Russian). M., 1966. P. 90.
Bloch A. Zakony Merfi dlya yuristov [Murphy’s Law: Lawyers] (in Russian) / Trans. from English by E.G. Gendel’. Minsk, 2003. P. 113.
Yudin A.V. Taktika v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: ponyatie, raznovidnosti i kriterii dopustimosti [Tactics in the Civil and Arbitration Process: Concept, Variety, and Acceptance Criteria] (in Russian) // Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Process. No. 6 (2007) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. St. Petersburg, 2008. P. 154–166.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya [Legal Behavior: Norm and Pathology] (in Russian). M., 1982. P. 214.
Mamchun V.V. Pravoprimenitel’nyi risk [Enforcement Risk] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 1999. P. 16.
Martirosyan A.G. Sootnoshenie viny i riska v grazhdanskom prave [The Ratio of Guilt and Risk in Civil Law] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2010. No. 7. P. 52.
Magaziner Ya.M. Zametki o prave [Notes on the Law] (in Russian) // Magaziner Ya.M. Selected Papers on the General Theory of Law / Ed. by A.K. Kravtsov. St. Petersburg, 2006. P. 318.
Krasavchikov O.A. Vozmeshchenie vreda, prichinennogo istochnikom povyshennoi opasnosti [Compensation for Damage Caused by a Source of Increased Danger] (in Russian) // Categories of Science of Civil Law. Selected Works: In 2 vols. Vol. 2. M., 2005. P. 413–414.
Prokudina L.A. Professionalizatsiya arbitrazhnogo protsessa (voprosy predstavitel’stva) [Professionalization of the Arbitration Process (issues of representation)] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2010. No. 3. P. 35.
Galuzin A.F. Pravonarusheniya kak osnovnaya ugroza pravovoi i sotsial’noi bezopasnosti [Offense as the Main Threat to the Legal and Social Security] (in Russian): Monograph. Samara, 2007. P. 141.
Information about the author
Yudin A.V. (Samara) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure and Business Law of the Samara State University (443011, Samara, Academic Pavlov st., 1a; e-mail: [email protected]).
A.V. Yudin
Advertisement
Our partners
