Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Incontrovertibility of the Court Decision

S.N. Khorunzhy,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Lecturer of the Department of 
Civil Law and Procedure of the Voronezh State University


The article explores the incontrovertibility of the judgment as a characteristic of the court decision, which has already entered into force; it extracts a close relationship between the incontrovertibility of judgment and principles of legal certainty and nonre- consideration of the same case (res judicata). Author explores practical issues of the judgments’ incontrovertibility in the court of cassation, in proceedings arising from the public relations, as well as when a judgment is made in absentia. The author notes that none of the parties can request a review of a final and binding judgment merely for the purpose of obtaining a rehearing and new regulation. The revision prerequisite of the erroneous judicial acts in any case shall meet the requirements of procedural economy in the use of remedies, the transparency of the justice system. They shall exclude or unjustified any delay in the resumption of the trial and thereby ensure the fairness of the decision and its legal certainty, including the recognition of judgments’ unenforceability and their incontrovertibility. The entering in force of the court decision provides all its properties, including incontrovertibility. It is a consequence of the legal force of the court decision, but not the reason of the acquisition by the court decision of its legal force. 

Keywords: judgment; validity; cogency; res judicata; judicial review; the appeal proceedings; review proceedings; judgment in absentia.


References 

    Engel’man I.E. Kurs russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Course of Russian Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). Yur’ev, 1912. P. 366–367. 
  Nefed’ev E.A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [A Textbook Russian Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). Krasnodar, 2005. P. 328. 
   Gurvich M.A. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works] (in Russian). Krasnodar, 2006. Vol. 1. P. 416, 417.          Zeyder N.B. Sudebnoe reshenie po grazhdanskomu delu [Civil Case Judgment] (in Russian). M., 1966. P. 135. 
   Kurpas M.V. Resheniya Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka o nadzornom sudoproizvodstve v Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the Supervisory Proceedings in the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // International Public and Private Law. 2011. No. 4. P. 2–8. 
   Fursov D.A. Sovremennoe ponimanie printsipov grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa: Uchebnoe posobie [Modern Understanding of the Principles of Civil and Arbitration Process: Textbook] (in Russian). M., 2009. P. 47–48. 
   Klinova E.V. Proyavlenie zakonnoy sily sudebnogo resheniya [Manifestation Unenforceable a Court Decision] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2004. P. 31–32. 
   Pobedonostsev K.P. Sudebnoe rukovodstvo [Judicial Guidance] (in Russian). M., 2004. Vol. 3. P. 299.     Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. M., 2012. P. 392. Avdyukov M.G. Sudebnoe reshenie [Court Decision] (in Russian). M., 1959. P. 141.             Foynitsky I.Ya. Kurs ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Course of Criminal Proceedings] (in Russian). Vol. 2. Petrograd, 1915. 
 Terekhova L.A. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse: problemy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya [Supervisory Proceedings in Civil Proceedings: Problems of Development and Improvement] (in Russian). M., 2009. 
   Neshataeva T.N. Uroki sudebnoy praktiki o pravakh cheloveka: evropeysky i rossiysky opyt [The Court Practice Lessons about Human Rights: European and Russian Experience] (in Russian). M., 2007.                Pukhan I., Polenak-Akimovskaya M. Rimskoe pravo (bazovy uchebnik) [Roman Law (basic textbook)] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.A. Tomsinov. M., 2003. 
 Chernykh I.I. K voprosu ob obzhalovanii zaochnogo resheniya v usloviyakh obnovlennogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [The Question of Appeal of a Default Judgment under Renewed Civil Procedural Law] (in Russian) // Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, and Practice. 2012. No. 5. P. 73–76. 
   Reshetnyak V.I., Chernykh I.I. Zaochnoe proizvodstvo i sudebny prikaz v grazhdanskom protsesse [In Absentia Proceedings and Judicial Order in Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 1997. P. 39–40. 

Information about the author 

  Khorunzhy S.N. (Voronezh) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Lecturer of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Voronezh State University (394006, Voronezh city, Lenin Sq., 10a; e-mail: [email protected]).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

S.N. Khorunzhy