We in a citing index:
On the Prospects of Private and Public Basis in Civil Proceedings
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the
Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy
The article is devoted to development of the private and public basis in civil process. The rules governing the relations, arising in connection with consideration of civil cases by court, in the vast majority belongs to that part of the law which is directly connected with authoritative activity of the state. The attention of scientists to issues of a correlation of private and public issues in a procedural law is in many respects connected with the objective processes in the Russian legal system as a whole. The reached level of freedom of participants of a civil circulation, autonomy of the personality in implementation of decisions made by it, lead to the need of development of a private-law segment not only in the sphere of material law, but also procedural law. It is a condition of full realization of economic freedom, independence and equality, protection of dignity of the personality, inviolability of property from any encroachments, effective protection of the rights of participants of a circulation against arbitrariness of certain persons acting on behalf of the state. The author draws a conclusion that the method of authoritative regulations is an administrative ground of the public basis in civil process and, on the contrary, the method of stimulation of certain kinds of activity is an administrative ground of the private-law basis.
Keywords: civil procedure; principles of law; the method of regulation.
Obshhaya teoriya gosudarstva i prava. Akademichesky kurs v tryoh tomah [General theory of state and law. Academical course in three volumes] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.N. Marchenko. 3rd ed., rev. and exp. M., 2010. Vol. 2: Law. P. 649.
Vikut M.A. Vzaimodejstvie publichnogo i chastnogo prava v grazhdanskih processual’nyh pravootnosheniyah [Interaction of public and private law in the civil procedural legal relationships] (In Russian) // Theoretical and applied problems of reform of the civil jurisdiction. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov, G.A. Zhilin, I.M. Zajtsev. Ekaterinburg, 1998. P. 33.
Zajtsev I.M. Sootnoshenie publichno-pravovogo i chastnopravovogo v grazhdan- skom processual’nom kodekse [The ratio of public law and private law in the Code of Civil Procedure] (in Russian) // Theoretical and applied problems of reform of the civil jurisdiction. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov, G.A. Zhilin, I.M. Zajtsev. Ekaterinburg, 1998. P. 27–28.
Zhilin G.A. Sootnoshenie publichnogo i chastnogo v deyatel’nosti sudov obshhej yurisdikcii po osushhestvleniyu pravosudiya po grazhdanskim delam [The ratio of public and private activities in the courts of general jurisdiction in the administration of justice in civil cases] (in Russian) // Theoretical and applied problems of reform of the civil jurisdiction. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov, G.A. Zhilin, I.M. Zajtsev. Ekaterinburg, 1998. P. 40.
Sukhanov E.A. O problemah stanovleniya i razvitiya rossijskogo chastnogo prava [On the problems of formation and development of Russian private law] (in Russian) // Civil notes. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Vol. 3. M., 2004. P. 29.
Perevalov V.D., Bublik V.A. Sovremennoe grazhdanskoe pravo – balans chastnogo i publichnogo [Modern civil law – the balance of private and public] (in Russian) // Civil notes. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers. Vol. 3. M., 2004. P. 47.
Korshunov N.M. Konvergenciya chastnogo i publichnogo prava: problemy teorii i praktiki [Convergence of public and private law: theory and practice problems] (in Russian). M., 2011. P. 222.
Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy edinstva i differenciacii [Civil proceedings: the problem of unity and differentiation] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. St. Petersburg, 2011. P. 15.
Sakhnova T.V. Sudebnye procedury (o budushhem civilisticheskogo processa) [Judicial proceedings (civil process on the future)] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Proceedings. 2009. No. 2. P. 10. Strel’tsova E.G. O koncepcii grazhdanskogo processa [On the concept of civil procedure] (in Russian) // Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Process. 2007. No. 6 / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. St. Petersburg, 2008. P. 59.
Dorohin S.V. Delenie prava na publichnoe i chastnoe: konstitucionno-pravovoj aspect [Division of the right to public and private: the constitutional and legal aspect] (in Russian). M., 2006. P. 4. Alekseev S.S. Pravo: azbuka – teoriya – filosofiya. Opyt kompleksnogo issledovaniya [Right: ABC – theory – philosophy. Experience of comprehensive study] (in Russian). M., 1999. P. 42.
Pokrovsky I.A. Osnovnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava [The main problems of civil law] (in Russian). M., 1998. P. 43–44.
Dyuryagin I.A. Pravo i upravlenie [Law and management]. M., 1981. P. 17.
Odar Ya.Je. O primenenii osnovnyh polozhenij teorii upravleniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom processe [On the application of the basic tenets of the theory of management in the Soviet civil process] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Tartu, 1974. P. 8.
Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinsky V.I., Samoshhenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. Jeffektivnost’ pravovyh norm [Effectiveness of legal norms] (in Russian). M., 1980. P. 93.
Filippova S.Yu. Chastnopravovye sredstva organizacii i dostizheniya pravovyh celej [Private legal means of organizing and achieving legal purposes] (in Russian). M., 2011. P. 76.
Bir St. Kibernetika i upravlenie proizvodstvom [Cybernetics and management] (in Russian) / Transl. from English by V.Ya. Altaev. M., 1963. P. 38. Reshetnikova I.V.,
Yarkov V.V. Grazhdanskoe pravo i process v sovremennoj Rossii [Civil law and process in modern Russia] (in Russian). M., 1999. P. 10–11.
Agarkov M.M. Tsennost’ chastnogo prava [Value of private law] (in Russian) // Proceedings of the professors and lecturers of the State University of Irkutsk. Irkutsk, 1920. Vol. 1. P. 4.
Yakovlev V.F. K probleme grazhdansko-pravovogo metoda regulirovaniya obshhest- vennyh otnoshenij [On the problem of civil-law method of regulating social relations] (in Russian) // Anthology of Ural civil science. 1925–1989. M., 2001. P. 376.
Yarkov V.V. Vliyanie reformy chastnogo prava na razvitie sistemy i form grazhdan- skoj yurisdikcii [Impact of the reform of private law on the development of systems and forms of civil jurisdiction] (in Russian) // Theoretical and applied problems of reform of the civil jurisdiction. Interuniversity collection of scientific papers / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov, G.A. Zhilin, I.M. Zajtsev. Ekaterinburg, 1998. P. 60.
Branovitsky K.L. Processual’ny dogovor v doktrine grazhdanskogo processa FRG [Procedural agreement in the doctrine of civil procedure in Germany] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Proceedings. 2010. No. 12. P. 30.
Murad’yan Je.M. Dispozitivnoe pravosudie kak jeticheskaya paradigma budu- shhego [Dispositive justice as an ethical paradigm of the future] (in Russian) // Modern Law. 2000. No. 4.
Krasavchikov O.A. Dispozitivnost’ v grazhdansko-pravovom regulirovanii [Optiona- lity in the civil-law regulation] (in Russian) // Krasavchikov O.A. Science category of civil law. Selected Works: In 2 vols. M., 2005. P. 69.
Gorshenev V.M., Shakhov I.B. Kontrol’ kak pravovaya forma deyatel’nosti [Control activities as a legal form] (in Russian). M., 1987. P. 23.
Chepurnova N.M. Sudebnaya vlast’ v Rossijskoj Federacii: problemy teorii i gosudarstvenno-pravovoj praktiki [Judicial power in the Russian Federation: problems of theory and public law practice] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 1999. P. 9, 37.
Information about the author
Kurochkin S.A. (Yekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy (620137, Yekaterinburg city, Komsomolskaya st., 21, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).