We in a citing index:
Mandatory Mediation: Arguments «For» and «Against»
A.I. Zaitsev,
Iandidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of
Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy
In the article the author analyzes the requirements for nominations of mediators, as well as the possibility of establishing mandatory mediation for certain categories of civil cases. The author gives examples of establishing mandatory mediation procedures in the history of the Russian state. Author expresses criticism of the establishment of mandatory mediation.
Keywords: mediation.
References
Vitsyn A. Arbitration court in Russian law: historical, dogmatic review. M., 1856. P. 76, 77.
Volkov A.F. Commercial arbitration courts. St. Petersburg, 1913. P. 137.
Mullen A.P. About institutionalized arbitration // Legal Gazette. Issue twenty-WYh. 1862. No. 7. P. 5.
Tkachenko V.I. Equality of criminal responsibility // State and Law. 1991. No. 12. P. 86.
Byrdin E.N. Reasons of a legal inequality in the Russian state // Lawyer. 2000. No. 10. P. 4–5.
Information about the author
Zaitsev A.I. (Saratov) – Iandidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy (410056, Saratov city, Volskaya st., 1, e-mail: [email protected]).
A.I. Zaitsev
Advertisement
Our partners
