We in a citing index:
INSTITUTE OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF THE RSFSR IN THE PERIOD OF DEVELOPED SOCIALISM
INSTITUTE OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY
IN CIVIL PROCEDURE OF THE RSFSR IN THE PERIOD
OF DEVELOPED SOCIALISM
M.R. ZAGIDULLIN,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor
of the Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure of the Law Faculty
of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
The article analyzes the provisions of the legislation of the RSFSR governing the justice in
civil cases and the application of measures of legal responsibility for procedural offenses.
After the Great October Revolution, the previous system of measures of legal responsibility
in civil procedure was, we can say, destroyed and rebuilt over the next decades. As the main
sources, the author used the Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR of 1964, the Law “On the
Judicial System of the RSFSR” of 1960, as well as other normative legal acts adopted in
accordance with them. The following measures of responsibility were applied to the subjects
of civil proceedings in the specified period were identified: imposition of court costs, fine,
arrest and other administrative penalties, criminal liability, enforcement fee, absentee
decision, recognition of circumstances, rejection/return of the application/complaint, drive,
removal, measures of public influence, compensation for the actual loss of time, private
definitions, party responsibility, disciplinary remarks and reprimands, demotion, dismissal,
prohibition to hold office. It is noted that, unfortunately, the responsibility for the abuse of
procedural right in the procedural law of the Soviet government has not yet been sufficiently
developed, although the very requirement of good faith behavior of participants in civil
procedure was.
Keywords: legal responsibility; civil procedure; RSFSR; developed socialism; misuse of right.
References
Aleksandrov A.N., Antonov Yu.I., Galakhova A.V. et al.; Galakhova A.V. (ed.). Prestupleniya
protiv pravosudiya [Crimes Against Justice]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Antsiferova L.A. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost’ sudej: praktika realizatsii [Disciplinary
Responsibility of Judges: Practice of Implementation]. Glagol pravosudiya =
Word of Justice, 2015, no. 2(10). (In Russian)
Argunov V.N., Borisova E.A., Ivanova S.A. et al.; Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Kommentariij
k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu RSFSR (postatejnyj) [Commentary
on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. 2nd ed. Moscow,
1997. (In Russian)
Dunyushkin P.A. Distsiplinarnaya otvetstvennost’ sudej v Rossii: istoriko-pravovoj diskurs
[Disciplinary Responsibility of Judges in Russia: Historical and Legal Discourse].
Yuridicheskaya nauka i praktika: Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj akademii MVD Rossii = Legal
Theory and Practice: Herald of the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian
Federation in Nizhny Novgorod, 2013, no. 23. (In Russian)
Egorova O.V. Obosnovannost’ kak trebovanie, pred’yavlyaemoe k zayavleniyu
o fal’sifikatsii (podlozhnosti) [Validity as a Requirement for the Application of Falsification
(Forgery)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure,
2016, no. 2. (In Russian)
Ershova N.V. Istoriya razvitiya norm o podlozhnosti sudebnogo dokazatel’stva v rossiiskom
protsessual’nom zakonodatel’stve [The History of the Development of Rules on
False Evidence in the Russian Procedural Legislation]. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo
prava = Current Issues of Russian Law, 2013, no. 3. (In Russian)
Grel Ya.V. Zloupotrebleniya storon protsessual’nymi pravami v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Abuses of the Parties by Procedural Rights
in Civil and Arbitration Procedure: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Novosibirsk, 2006. (In Russian)
Kirova T.A. Razvitie idei pravosudiya kak ob’ekta ugolovno-pravovoj okhrany
v otechestvennoj yuridicheskoj mysli vtoroj poloviny XX veka [The Development of the
Idea of Justice as an Object of Criminal Law Protection in the Domestic Legal Thought
of the Second Half of the 20th Century]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie
nauki = Herald of the Perm University. Jurisprudence, 2016, no. 1(31). (In Russian)
Valeev D.Kh. Protsessual’naya otvetstvennost’ v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Procedural
Responsibility in Enforcement Proceedings]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal
of Russian Law, 2004, no. 4. (In Russian)
Volkov V.A. Zloupotreblenie grazhdanskimi pravami. Problemy teorii i praktiki [Abuse
of Civil Rights. Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2009. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Zagidullin M.R. (Kazan, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor
of the Department of Environmental, Labor Law and Civil Procedure of the Law
Faculty of the Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan,
420008, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Zagidullin M.R. Institut yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti v grazhdanskom protsesse RSFSR
v period razvitogo sotsializma [Institute of Legal Responsibility in Civil Procedure of
the RSFSR in the Period of Developed Socialism]. Вестник гражданского процесса =
Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 2, p. 121–137. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-
0781-2019-9-2-121-137
M.R. ZAGIDULLIN
Advertisement
Our partners
