We in a citing index:
Privatization of Justice
Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings
of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University
Privatization of justice is the most vivid direction, with which the latest changes in civil procedure are connected. What is the privatization of justice, what results have already been obtained and what are projected, is discussed on the basis of data on the results of reforms in the United States and in Western Europe. The most important issue is the threat of the elimination of justice in its present form, which is a civilizational value and the return to court of two types – elite, qualitative for the chosen circle of persons and ersatzjustice for the rest. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not permissible. ADR cannot act as a mechanism equal to justice in resolving disputes settled by state law. The sphere of development of ADR is social relations, regulated by soft law. Therefore, ADR should develop through the expansion of the autonomy of individual communities to regulate the social relations that develop in these communities.
Keywords: privatization of justice; court; law; humanitarian value; alternative dispute resolution (ADR); private person autonomy; state duties; workfare state (post-social state); public relations; soft law; compulsory execution.
Afanasiev S.F. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: teoretiko-prakticheskoe issledovanie vliyaniya Evropejskoj Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod na rossijskoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo [The Right to a Fair Trial: A Theoretical and Practical Study of the Impact of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms on Russian Civil Procedure]: Thesis Diss. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2010. (In Russian)
Alekhina S.A. O nemotivirovannom reshenii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [On Unmotivated Decisions in Civil Proceedings]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2016, no. 4. (In Russian)
Andrews N. The Three Paths of Justice: Court Proceedings, Arbitration, and Mediation in England. Springer, 2012. Besemer C.; Malova N.V. (trans.). Mediatsiya. Posrednichestvo v konfliktakh [Mediation. Mediation in Conflicts]. Kaluga, 2004. (In Russian)
Borisova E.A. Nekotorye voprosy uproshchyonnogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse [Some Issues of Summary Proceedings in Civil Procedure]. In Aktual’nye problemy sovremennykh form zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina: Sbornik nauchnykh statej i tezisov po materialam Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii «Aktual’nye problemy sovremennykh form zashchity prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina » [Actual Problems of Modern Forms of Protection of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms: Collection of Scientific Articles and Abstracts on the Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Actual Problems of Modern Forms of Protection of Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms»]. Veliky Novgorod, 2017. (In Russian)
Carbonnier J. Yuridicheskaya sotsiologiya [Juridical Sociology]. Moscow, 1986. (In Russian)
Chejz O. Osnovnoj doklad (Sektsiya 1. Mnogoobrazie form razresheniya sporov. Formal’nye i neformal’nye protsedury) [Keynote Address (Section 1. The Variety of Forms of Dispute Resolution. Formal and Informal Procedures). In Maleshin D.Ya. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess v mezhkul’turnom dialoge: evrazijskij kontekst: Vsemirnaya konferentsiya Mezhdunarodnoj assotsiatsii protsessual’nogo prava, 18–21 sentyabrya 2012 goda, Moskva [Civil Procedure in Intercultural Dialogue: Eurasian Context: World Conference of the International Association of Procedural Law, 18–21 September 2012, Moscow]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Streltsova E.G. (Moscow, Russia) – Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (125993, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., 9; e-mail: email@example.com).
Streltsova E.G. Privatizatsiya pravosudiya [Privatization of Justice]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 2, p. 47–80. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-2-47-80