We in a citing index:
Influence of Information Technologies on the Systematization of the Civil Procedural Legislation
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law
of the Saratov State Law Academy
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory
of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy
The article is devoted to analysis of the level of balance of modern civil procedural law. The paper considers some issues of civil procedural law systematization including the influence of information technologies on it. The paper discusses some problems of its taxonomy. The authors define some errors the legislator initially made during the formation of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. They include the lack of structure of the Code as there are no clearly defined General and Special parts, as well as some procedural rules are placed in the sources of substantive law. In addition, the work highlighted a number of deficiencies in the content and structure of the legislation caused by the reform of civil procedure in Russia. In particular, the reform of the system of revision of judicial acts caused including two almost overlapping chapters (devoted to cassation and supervisory court instances), that leads to violation of the legal certainty principle. The article also describes in detail the issues of the impact of judicial reforms on the structure and content of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with adoption of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation. Problems of regulation of simplified procedure and others are also highlighted. The authors come to conclusion on the invaluable role of information technologies in the systematization of civil procedural legislation. At the same time, it is noted that today they are not used fully.
Keywords: civil procedure; systematization; information technologies; codification; reform; structure; administrative justice; judicial review; simplified production.
Absalyamov A.V. Problemy administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva v arbitrazhnom protsesse: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Problems of Administrative Procedure in Arbitration Proceedings: Thesis Diss. Candidate of Legal Sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2000. (In Russian)
Bakhrakh D. Nuzhna spetsializatsiya sudej, a ne sudov [We Need Specialization of Judges but Not Courts]. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice, 2003, no. 2. (In Russian)
Bonner A.T. Burzhuaznaya administrativnaya yustitsiya [Bourgeois Administrative Justice]. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence, 1969, no. 1. (In Russian)
Bonner A.T. Proizvodstvo po delam, voznikayushchim iz publichnykh pravootnoshenij [Proceedings on Cases Arising from Public Relations]. In Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2005. (In Russian)
Chechot D.M. Administrativnaya yustitsiya (teoreticheskie problemy) [Administrative Justice (Theoretical Problems)]. St. Petersburg, 1973. (In Russian)
Demichev A.A., Isaenkova O.V. Problemy realizatsii prava na sudebnuyu zashchitu v evropejskikh gosudarstvakh [Problems of Realization of the Right to Judicial Protection in European States]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of the Saratov State Academy of Law, 2006, no. 5. (In Russian)
Ershov V. Razdelenie vlastej. K voprosu o kompetentsii sudov po razresheniyu administrativnykh sporov [Separation of Powers. On the Competence of Courts to Resolve Administrative Disputes]. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice, 2001, no. 11. (In Russian)
Gatin A.A.; Valeev D.Kh. (ed.). Proizvodstvo ob osparivanii nenormativnykh pravovykh aktov, reshenij, dejstvij (bezdejstviya) gosudarstvennykh organov, organov mestnogo samoupravleniya, inykh organov, dolzhnostnykh lits, gosudarstvennykh i munitsipal’nykh sluzhashchikh v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: Monografiya [Proceedings on Challenging Non-Normative Legal Acts, Decisions, Actions (Inaction) of State Bodies, Local Self-Government Bodies, Other Bodies, Officials, State and Municipal Employees in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings: Monograph]. Saratov, 2011. (In Russian)
Golichenko M.M. Pravovaya priroda uchastiya isttsa i otvetchika v iskovom proizvodstve: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Legal Nature of the Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Participation in Proceedings: Thesis Diss. Candidate of Legal Sciences]. Saratov, 2003. (In Russian)
Information about the authors
Senyakin I.N. (Saratov, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law of the Saratov State Law Academy (410028, Saratov, Chernyshevsky St., 104, Bldg. 1, Room 210, 212; e-mail: email@example.com);
Barsukova V.N. (Saratov, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy (410028, Saratov, Chernyshevsky St., 104, Bldg. 1, Room 210, 212; e-mail: barsukovavn79@ gmail.com).
Senyakin I.N., Barsukova V.N. Vliyanie informatsionnykh tekhnologij na sistematizatsiyu sovremennogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [Influence of Information Technologies on the Systematization of the Civil Procedural Legislation]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 1, p. 60–79. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-1-60-79
I.N. Senaykin, V.N. Barsukova